G-KIRAN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2000, 736 posts, RR: 0 Posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4818 times:
I have descided to go back to FS2004 after hearing alot of the hoo haa about FSX not being able to run well on current machines. My old computer which I no longer have, was a P4 2.4ghz with 512mb of RAM. I am currently thinking of buying something that is at least equivalent to a P4 3ghz with 1mb RAM. However I have read elsewhere and on this forum somewhere that Fs2004 is not optimized for dual core operatiuon and that it will run faster on a P4 3ghz single core machine than a 2offghz dual core setup. Is this true?
Would it be better to buy a Celeron at 3+ghz and lots of ram than a low-end dual core set up also with lots of RAM to get a smooth (15-20 fps) performance in FS2004? I am aiming to use some freeware scenary airport addones, dense AFCAD and the odd bit of high-tech planes such as PMDG's 747.
AFC_Ajax00 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 775 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4808 times:
I'm running FS2004 on a Dell 640M with a dual core 2.0Ghz Intel, 1 gig of RAM and 64mb of shared video memory. I don't have much add-on scenery or other add-ons for that matter (save the usual freeware aircraft) but the game runs fine on this setup, I'm quite pleased actually!
Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward; for there you long to return