Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Scanners  
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 9 months 9 hours ago) and read 5444 times:

Hi,

I am thinking of getting a scanner which is of good quality and has good range and is reasonably priced.

Can somebody recommend some?

Thanks
Tom.


Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRyanair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 9 hours ago) and read 5444 times:

Tom,

I have the Maycom AR-108 (retails at around £75) and it has lasted me with no problems for 5 years of continuous usage. It is a nice piece of kit and can store 99 frequencies, it is small too so can easily fit in your pocket etc. If you live near an airport you'll pick up the traffic, but you will also be able to pick up overhead traffic if you have the squelch on. It is a great little scanner for the price, have a look:

http://www.transair.co.uk/product4.asp?SID=2&Product_ID=580


User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5416 times:

Quoting Ryanair737 (Reply 1):
but you will also be able to pick up overhead traffic if you have the squelch on

Cool, so if I had the Squelch on I say pick up the radio from planes requesting flight level changes (for example) when they are flying over head. Big grin

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineRyanair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5410 times:

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 2):
Cool, so if I had the Squelch on I say pick up the radio from planes requesting flight level changes (for example) when they are flying over head. Big grin

Yep this is correct.


User currently offlineBond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5401 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5401 times:

Quoting Ryanair737 (Reply 1):
If you live near an airport you'll pick up the traffic, but you will also be able to pick up overhead traffic if you have the squelch on.



Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 2):
Cool, so if I had the Squelch on I say pick up the radio from planes requesting flight level changes (for example) when they are flying over head

Not sure what this has to do with the squelch ???

The squelch just limits the threshold at which the transmission will be output from the speaker.

If anything, you're going to hear everything possible with the squelch OFF ... if it's on, you're limiting the output to those over a certain signal strength.


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5367 times:

Would anybody else recommend any Scanners?

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineRyanair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5361 times:

Quoting Bond007 (Reply 4):
Not sure what this has to do with the squelch ???

The squelch just limits the threshold at which the transmission will be output from the speaker.

If anything, you're going to hear everything possible with the squelch OFF ... if it's on, you're limiting the output to those over a certain signal strength.

If I have the squelch off and I'm trying to get overhead broadcasts on my scanner I DO NOT pick up all the traffic as I would do with the squelch on, this is from my personal experience with listening to ATC for about 5 years from my house!


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 7, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5342 times:

Quoting Ryanair737 (Reply 6):
Quoting Bond007 (Reply 4):
Not sure what this has to do with the squelch ???

The squelch just limits the threshold at which the transmission will be output from the speaker.

If anything, you're going to hear everything possible with the squelch OFF ... if it's on, you're limiting the output to those over a certain signal strength.

If I have the squelch off and I'm trying to get overhead broadcasts on my scanner I DO NOT pick up all the traffic as I would do with the squelch on

Ah, "squelch on", "squelch open", etc... often a cause of confusion. Are we all saying the same thing?  Smile

With the squelch turned "all the way down", to use a non-technical term, you should hear all transmissions with white noise in between. With the squelch turned "all the way up", you won't hear anything except the strongest transmissions with silence in between.

To me, "squelch on" means turning the squelch "up" until it mutes the white noise (and possibly further to block all but the strongest signals), and "squelch off" means turning it "down" until weaker signals (including white noise) are heard... but that's just the way I think about it so it might not be right.  Smile


User currently offlineBond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5401 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (6 years 8 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5341 times:

Quoting David L (Reply 7):
To me, "squelch on" means turning the squelch "up" until it mutes the white noise (and possibly further to block all but the strongest signals), and "squelch off" means turning it "down" until weaker signals (including white noise) are heard... but that's just the way I think about it so it might not be right.

Well, that's factually correct ... hence my comment  Wink

Squelch "off" would be the same as if the radio had no squelch circuitry at all.


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 9, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5325 times:

Thanks, though I wasn't trying to be right, just trying to get us all on to the same page.  Smile

User currently offlineRyanair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5316 times:

Quoting David L (Reply 7):
With the squelch turned "all the way down", to use a non-technical term, you should hear all transmissions with white noise in between.

I have it "all the way down" then which to me means squelch on as I can hear the white noise and all transmissions, but if that is known as squelch off to you guys then so be it!  Smile

So, AirbusA346 you will hear overhead broadcasts from your house if you have the squelch "all the way down" like these guys have explained and that is how I have it.


User currently offlineBond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5401 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5314 times:

Quoting Ryanair737 (Reply 10):
I have it "all the way down" then which to me means squelch on as I can hear the white noise and all transmissions, but if that is known as squelch off to you guys then so be it!

So, AirbusA346 you will hear overhead broadcasts from your house if you have the squelch "all the way down" like these guys have explained and that is how I have it.

Now we're on the same page  Smile


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5305 times:

Does anybody else recommend anymore scanners apart from the one mentioned at the start of the thread.

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineBond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5401 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5301 times:

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 12):
Does anybody else recommend anymore scanners apart from the one mentioned at the start of the thread.

Probably not if it's for purchase in the UK. I have a Uniden Bearcat, and a Radio Shack PRO-97. Both are overkill for listening to ATC only, but both are good. I have used a cheaper Uniden Bearcat in the past, and been very happy with. I've also a number of the Radio Shack handhelds cheaper and less complex than the PRO-97 and been happy with them also. The advantages of the PRO-97 is it picks up UHF, so it's possible to listen to a lot of military stuff that only use UHF (generally fighters - transports also use VHF). The PRO-97 also allows a couple of lines of text to entered on each stored frequency... which is cool when you're scanning or looking for a freq. For example, it'll show "Tampa Approach" on the display, if that's what I store with the TPA Approach freq. It also has a PC interface which allows you to download and store whole banks of frequencies .. again, overkill unless you want to load every frequency with a 200m radius or similar!

Jimbo

[Edited 2007-11-08 14:35:10]


I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 14, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5283 times:

Quoting Bond007 (Reply 13):
Probably not if it's for purchase in the UK.

I think most of those are available in the UK but it depends how serious it needs to be. For listening only to civil traffic near airports and to airways traffic in the UK, the AR-108 is perfect due to having 99 memory channels and being pretty small.

I have the AOR AR-8200 Mk II which allows searches, scans, dual channel, etc., and can be interfaced to a computer. The most useful feature is the memory bank facility. There are 1000 memory channels split into 20 banks, any combination of which can be scanned. I have one bank for central Scotland, another for the London area, another for Geneva, another for NY, etc. It means I can leave all the frequencies I ever need in memory and only scan the appropriate banks so as not to waste time scanning inappropriate frequencies.

I've even written a VB application that can download the stored frequencies and settings for easier manipulation on a PC and I can also run selective scans and searches and record the number of transmissions on each frequency in my absence so I can see which are worth listening to.

It really depends what you want to do with a scanner.  Smile


User currently offlineBond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5401 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 5280 times:

Quoting David L (Reply 14):
AOR AR-8200

Yeah, sounds similar to my PRO-97 ... great for the serious enthusiast, but too much for just listening to LHR and a few airways freqs.  Smile

Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5138 times:

Just a question, which one is better (because there is only £5 difference)

http://www.transair.co.uk/product4.asp?SID=2&Product_ID=580

http://www.transair.co.uk/product4.asp?SID=2&Product_ID=3749

And is there anymore online shops in the UK like Transair which you would recommend?

Thanks
Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 17, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5115 times:



Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 16):
which one is better (because there is only £5 difference)

The first difference I can see is that the Bearcat has the 88-108 MHz band for commercial radio (mono, I assume) so is a bit more versatile for everyday use. If you're in the habit of travelling with an MP3 player with FM radio, it probably doesn't matter, though.

The AR-108 seems to be very slightly more compact.


User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5114 times:



Quoting David L (Reply 17):

So which would you personally go for?

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 19, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5106 times:



Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 18):
So which would you personally go for?

Sorry, can't help you there. As I said, I already have an "overkill" scanner so I wouldn't personally go for either.  Smile


User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5105 times:

Do you know of any more online shops?

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5085 times:

David, just pretend you have got an 'overkill' scanner, which one of the two above would you buy?

And how much was your 'overkill' scanner?

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 22, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5082 times:



Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 21):
David, just pretend you have got an 'overkill' scanner, which one of the two above would you buy?

Honestly, I don't have a preference. They both seem to have about the same airband capabilities, one has the commercial FM band and the other is a bit more compact. There's no point in me deciding whether someone else wants the extra FM band.  Smile

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 21):
And how much was your 'overkill' scanner?

Um... £400.


User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

£400 are you mad!!!!!!!!!!????????????

I think I will probably go for the £79.99 one because it has more freq range.

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5070 times:

Hi David,

There is a Bearcat on this webpage (http://www.sbs-1.co.uk/) is it the same one as on the Transair site.

Just double checking because it is there seems to be quite a price drop.

Also where do you think the volume control is on the bearcat?

Tom.

[Edited 2007-11-22 09:33:36]


Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
25 Post contains images David L : I was earning a decent salary at the time . Those days are gone . Looks like it: UBC-30XLT Looking at other Uniden units and the fact that another ph
26 Post contains images AirbusA346 : Cool! I'm surprised at the price difference though. Tom.
27 Super Em : I too recently purchased a Pro-97. It was on sale for $169.99 (Should've of waited cause it's on sale for $129 for Black Friday) It is an excellent s
28 Post contains links Maxketan : Try at Maplin electonics store. you will find good one for less. I have bought Maycom AR-108 for £39. www.maplin.co.uk ketan
29 Bond007 : Yes, I agree. If all you want is to scan a handful of frequencies, then there is cheaper. It sounds like the AR-108 is a good buy ... but no personal
30 Mikey : Ive owned a AR-108 but I lost it in Imperial Hill at LAX. I liked its small size but it gave me troubles at LAX that it gave me some static noises whe
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Scanners
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aviation Scanners posted Fri Nov 18 2005 18:00:57 by AirWillie6475
Scanners And Aerials posted Thu Oct 27 2005 20:24:16 by TheSorcerer
Scanners - Radio Shack Pro-83 Or Maycom AR-108? posted Tue Jun 28 2005 12:08:43 by Nimish
Scanners posted Wed May 25 2005 15:30:58 by Gerry
Acars Scanners For Contrails. posted Thu Mar 10 2005 13:59:47 by LHRSIMON
Icom Scanners posted Sat Mar 5 2005 17:36:55 by Aa7e7
Radio Scanners, Which One To Get? posted Thu Feb 17 2005 11:39:34 by Fergulmcc
Scanners...worth Buying One Nowadays? posted Fri Oct 8 2004 21:17:03 by Mygind66
Scanners: When/Where Do You Use Them? posted Mon Aug 23 2004 18:45:40 by DIA
Sony Pro Scanners posted Mon Aug 16 2004 05:10:17 by RG828

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format