Pl4nekr4zy From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, RR: 3 Reply 3, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3751 times:
Nice work, ZSOFN! I'm a big fan of airliner profile art. I'd love to see some more of your work if you care to share.
KPWM From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2288 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3735 times:
Those are great. They look extremely real. Ohh and good choice of aircraft!
UltimateDelta From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 1993 posts, RR: 6 Reply 5, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3728 times:
Those are totally amazing!! Great job, and I'm glad you chose 777s!
StarAlliance38 From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 1445 posts, RR: 4 Reply 7, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3687 times:
Pl4nekr4zy From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, RR: 3 Reply 10, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 3613 times:
Great stuff ZSOFN!! I love the 744s. A few comments (from a fellow airliner profile artist): You seem to have the starboard winglet showing on the 744s as well as the starboard wingtip of the 772s, just curious as to why you did that? Kinda goes against the concept of a profile. Also, you should add all the little antennas, beacons, etc., on the top and underside of the fuselage.
ZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1391 posts, RR: 8 Reply 11, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 3607 times:
Thanks very much! I noticed your work on the other thread - truly phenomenal. Of course I cut all the corners by using Photoshop and can't draw with a pencil for peanuts.
I chose to show the winglets on the far side as I've simulated some wingflex as though at takeoff weight. Having worked on some renders at that sort of stage in flight, from a 90° angle you can generally see the winglet on the far side above the fuselage.
Pl4nekr4zy From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, RR: 3 Reply 12, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3598 times:
Quoting ZSOFN (Reply 11): I chose to show the winglets on the far side as I've simulated some wingflex as though at takeoff weight. Having worked on some renders at that sort of stage in flight, from a angle you can generally see the winglet on the far side above the fuselage.
Well, keep in mind a true profile rendering (which is of course an unrealistic and impossible view) depicts all aspects of the plane from an exact 90° perspective, as you mentioned. So the far winglet should be entirely hidden by the near winglet, just as the no. 3 engine is perfectly hidden by the no. 2 engine. So IMO, the little bit of the starboard winglet you have showing should be removed. But it's your work so it's of course up to you. Excellent work nonetheless!
ZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1391 posts, RR: 8 Reply 13, posted (5 years 1 month 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3562 times:
I see what you're saying. My thinking is/was that the viewpoint is looking at the mid-point at the fuselage from a far distance, although not infinite. As such, perspective allows for that far winglet to appear. Of course an "infinite" perspective would correct this...
UltimateDelta From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 1993 posts, RR: 6 Reply 14, posted (5 years 1 month 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3552 times:
Wow! Those are totally wicked! I especially love the DL 777 and the BA and LH 747s. Purely amazing!
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1391 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
