Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Airways Magazine Publisher  
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Algeria, joined May 2002, 13937 posts, RR: 23
Posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 25054 times:

Just heard that Airways Magazine changed hands and has a new publisher. Anybody an idea about who the new publisher is -- and whether there will be changes ?

46 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinesk736 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 596 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 25029 times:

I still can't find the March issue in the UK - I hope the new publisher can work out how to ship the magazine to the UK more quickly than the previous publisher could manage.

User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 24940 times:

Quoting ME AVN FAN (Thread starter):

Just heard that Airways Magazine changed hands and has a new publisher. Anybody an idea about who the new publisher is -- and whether there will be changes ?

Where did you hear that ? Can you please tell us who the new publisher is ? I hope they don't start screwing around with the format.

Combat Aircraft monthly and Air Forces monthly now have the same ownership as of a few months ago and so far there have been no major changes.



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (3 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 24285 times:

Quoting ME AVN FAN (Thread starter):
Anybody an idea about who the new publisher is

I think it's a rumor. The May issue, which I just got, still says it's published by Airways International in Sandpoint ID.

I don't see anything on the website either:
http://www.airwaysmag.com/


User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 184 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 24157 times:

I think they meant Airliners. Airliners has had some issues in delivering the latest issues

Nothing has changed at Airways


User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (3 years 1 month 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 24057 times:

Quoting UA767400 (Reply 4):
Airliners has had some issues in delivering the latest issues


For the record, the publication "recently" renamed itself "Airliners & Airports," although use of the name was inconsistent as you can see at their website.

At last check, in mid-December, Airliners & Airports reportedly had an issue printed but held up "on the loading dock" for unspecified reasons. A quick check of http://www.airliners.tv/ shows the site still up showing the LH 747-8 issue as "current.

I have no inside information on this, but absent any response to sporadic emails in early 2013, I must conclude Airliners & Airports has most likely ceased publication.


User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 22752 times:

Quoting psa188 (Reply 5):
At last check, in mid-December, Airliners & Airports reportedly had an issue printed but held up "on the loading dock" for unspecified reasons. A quick check of http://www.airliners.tv/ shows the site still up showing the LH 747-8 issue as "current.

I have no inside information on this, but absent any response to sporadic emails in early 2013, I must conclude Airliners & Airports has most likely ceased publication.

I was about to call my credit card to get refunded for my subscription, but I figured I should call the magazine first to make sure they are in fact officially T.U.

To my surprise the call was answered, and I was told the same thing about a 'new' issue being held up on the loading dock. Probably missed some payments to the shipper. It was acknowledged the magazine is in default to its subscribers but I was told they are still officially in production. He then rambled on about how the publishing industry has changed since the launch of Airliners... even though there are actually more airline enthusiast magazines in print now than back then.



FLYi
User currently offlineWA707atMSP From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2519 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 22506 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 6):
He then rambled on about how the publishing industry has changed since the launch of Airliners... even though there are actually more airline enthusiast magazines in print now than back then.

I think this is the reason Airliners is struggling.

When Airliners launched in 1988, the only magazines targeted at airline enthusiasts were World Airline Fleets and Propliner, both of which were targeted at small subsets of the airline enthusiast community.

Now, Airliners competes with Airways and Airliner World, as well as this website. Very few airline enthusiasts want (or can afford) to subscribe to all three of the "general interest" airline magazines. Too many of Airliners' articles recently have seemed to be written by the magazine's advertisers, and Airliners' publication schedule has become more erratic, so I think when enthusiasts have to decide which magazines to continue getting, and which magazines to drop, many are choosing to drop Airliners and keep Airways or Airliner World.

Although Propliner is the most expensive of the airline enthusiast magazines, I think the reason it has survived is because it has stayed narrowly focused on piston and turboprop aircraft, and articles about the subjects it covers are almost impossible to find elsewhere.



Seaholm Maples are #1!
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 22479 times:

Quoting WA707atMSP (Reply 7):
Too many of Airliners' articles recently have seemed to be written by the magazine's advertisers, and Airliners' publication schedule has become more erratic, so I think when enthusiasts have to decide which magazines to continue getting, and which magazines to drop, many are choosing to drop Airliners and keep Airways or Airliner World.

Exactly and I think this is the reason Airliners is failing. Its not the digital revolution, but poor internal decisions relating to the magazine's content which has alienated its readers.

Airliners was the first of the current bunch, so if they stayed true to their purpose then I don't see why they couldn't have defended their market share and be as successful as Airways and Airliner World.



FLYi
User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4672 posts, RR: 21
Reply 9, posted (2 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 22240 times:

Airliners just seems to be dead. Their Facebook page has been all but abandoned. Their website, as pointed out, is also out of date. I think its one of those situations where they just need to pack it in and call it good. Airways seems to be mostly stable right but that is probably thanks to their growing web properties. I finally decided to cut them loose this year. I normally always renew for 3 years but the value is gone. I get the news and stories much quicker online through various sources, that they really aren't needed anymore. I also find that they take too many liberties in push a bias, although subtle most of the time, in their storytelling that it is just a turn off. In one of the last couple issues I got, I got a chuckle of them saying Tom Horton is getting a promotion in the US/AA merger when we all know he's getting kicked to the curb - with a golden parachute of some sort of course (depending what they can get approved).

User currently offlineWA707atMSP From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2519 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (2 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 22114 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 8):
Airliners was the first of the current bunch, so if they stayed true to their purpose then I don't see why they couldn't have defended their market share and be as successful as Airways and Airliner World.

Airways was launched after a disagreement among the founding owners / writers of Airliners over the magazine's strategic direction. Had the people responsible for Airliners' launch been able to agree on how the magazine would evolve, Airways would not exist.

Airliners' quality declined after Airways was launched, because many of Airliners' best writers started writing for Airways instead, and Airliners had to publish some weaker articles just to fill up space in the magazine.



Seaholm Maples are #1!
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 21065 times:

Quoting WA707atMSP (Reply 10):
Airliners' quality declined after Airways was launched, because many of Airliners' best writers started writing for Airways instead, and Airliners had to publish some weaker articles just to fill up space in the magazine.

That happened initially, but then Airliners regained its footing, especially after Jon Proctor became editor sometime in the 1990s. The magazine stayed strong under subsequent editors David Kaufman and Jay Selman but ownership changes after that turned off some long time readers. Unfortunately, the current ownership couldn't make things work and that issue with the LH 747-8 on the cover probably will be the last. If the one supposedly on the loading dock last December ever appears, it will be a collector's item.

It's really a shame as I used to write for them.


User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (2 years 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 15065 times:

So I received the June issue of Airways magazine and was disappointed by major changes (actually a complete overhaul of the magazine). Airways was awesome for 20 years since the first issue, so for that reason alone I was disappointed - why fix what is not broken?

As I started to look closer at the magazine I saw that the offices were in Miami ("Oh no" I thought to myself as I know that is where the old Airliners was located). Sure enough, the new publisher and editor of Airways did work with Airliners, and the previous editor of Airliners is now on the staff of Airways. Nothing against those individuals on a personal basis, but the fact is Airliners went down hill real fast under their watch.

While the June issue is still good, I think it is quite a bit worse than the past couple years of Airways. I hope it does not continue to trend in that direction like Airliners did. Keeping my fingers crossed....


I have every issue of Airliners and Airways (as well as Airliner World and Airports of the World). Both magazines under John Wegg were outstanding, and I wish him the best going forward whether it is retirement or new endeavors.



FLYi
User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17640 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (2 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 15051 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 12):

Oh no, I just renewed my subscription for another 3 years, so hopefully it wont change to the worse.



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 14890 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 12):
So I received the June issue of Airways magazine and was disappointed by major changes (actually a complete overhaul of the magazine)
Quoting PITrules (Reply 12):
While the June issue is still good, I think it is quite a bit worse than the past couple years of Airways

What exactly are these major changes that turned you off ?



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 14873 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 14):

What exactly are these major changes that turned you off ?

Historical essays seem to have taken a back seat, the quality of many (not all) photos has decreased as there seems to be less resolution (printing process?), and there seems to be more wasted space.



FLYi
User currently offlinevin2basketball From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 350 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 14872 times:

http://airchive.com/blog/2014/03/12/...es-with-airchive-alliance-rebrand/

User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (2 years 16 hours ago) and read 14797 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 12):
As I started to look closer at the magazine I saw that the offices were in Miami ("Oh no" I thought to myself as I know that is where the old Airliners was located). Sure enough, the new publisher and editor of Airways did work with Airliners, and the previous editor of Airliners is now on the staff of Airways. Nothing against those individuals on a personal basis, but the fact is Airliners went down hill real fast under their watch.

I say give it time. Your observations of the new editor of Airways is true as far as it goes, but that individual was not handling the business end or editorial policy over at Airliners during the final days. The decline of Airliners was complicated but cannot be blamed on the new editor of Airways.

Although it's tough when there's a shift in editors at a popular publication, the magazine can survive. For example, Trains is still thriving long after beloved editor David P. Morgan retired. Let's give the new Airways a chance.


User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 9 hours ago) and read 14783 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 14):
What exactly are these major changes that turned you off ?

What I also found worrying was the comment in the editor's letter saying they would also start focusing on more of the travel-related aspects (e.g.- hotels). That's not why I subscribed. Also, the overall look and feel just looks off - and I agree with the comment

Quoting PITrules (Reply 15):
there seems to be more wasted space.

The kerning in the articles looked off. I'll give it time, but I'm not sure I'll be renewing at this point.



Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 14753 times:

Quoting CV990A (Reply 18):
The kerning in the articles looked off.

That's a rather arcane thing on which to judge a newly-reformatted magazine.

Quoting CV990A (Reply 18):
What I also found worrying was the comment in the editor's letter saying they would also start focusing on more of the travel-related aspects (e.g.- hotels).

I'll admit that this didn't thrill me either, but I'm willing to give it time to see how it plays out. For example, if someone wrote about a flight to DXB and stayed at Premier Inn Dubai International Airport, I'd want to know what this close-to-airport hotel is like. I don't want to see Airways turn into a Sunday travel supplement, but in some cases hotels are relevant to the flying. For example, if I have an early flight out tomorrow, is their a reasonably price option to stay near the departure airport?


User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 14686 times:

Just got the magazine and it has a very slick " Airliners" type look to it. So far none of the changes have bothered me, except for some images in poor resolution. Yet for some reason their website has not been updated to show the new June issue....


http://www.airwaysmag.com/



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 14600 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 20):
Yet for some reason their website has not been updated to show the new June issue....

Considering the fact that the entire operation is making a complete transition, updating the website is probably pretty much down the list.

Quoting alberchico (Reply 20):
Yet for some reason their website has not been updated to show the new June issue....

I just checked-June is been updated.


User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 8051 times:

Apologies for bumping this thread but it looks like the paper stock has been upgraded to a more glossy high quality finish.
Looks like the complaints paid off.




short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 23, posted (10 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 8040 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 22):
Apologies for bumping this thread but it looks like the paper stock has been upgraded to a more glossy high quality finish.
Looks like the complaints paid off.

The editor's introduction in that issue discusses a recent survey that was sent to subscribers. They've been responsive to feedback, for example the first couple of issues under new management had a difficult to read font which got changed back to normal in recent issues. The biggest complaint was that they did away with the glossy photos and those are now back.

Personally, I am happy that they're still running the historical articles.


User currently offline910A From United States of America, joined Apr 2015, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7997 times:

The August edition is just a disaster. There is so many mistakes in it, apparently no one edits it.
#1 - pg. 8 The Spirit photo - comment Hughes AirWest was known as the Top Banana in the Sky...no it wasn't it was the Top Banana in the West..
#2 - pg. 11 - EasyJest photo - comment saying the aircraft is still wearing the test registration D-AVVL, clearly in the photo shows G-EZOL on the aircraft.
#3 - Michael Manning article on Frontier - Factually incorrect that F9 successfully competed with jetBlue and Virgin America. First of all VX doesn't even fly to Denver, and jetBlue is a eastern north-south airline and historically has been as been a non-factor in the Rocky Mountain area.
Factually incorrect - Frontier had a fortress hub at DEN. I wonder if United, and now Southwest would agree with that. Rule #1 regarding fortress hubs, you have to be the #1 carrier in the the market, which F9 has never been at DEN.
#4- The inflight review on pg.39 regarding KLM. When did the KLM 330-200 seats 332 passengers, when the next line had 244 seats, where is the proof reader? The comment left holding the bag in Atlanta, the author doesn't mention if they flew KLM or Delta across the Atlantic.

I been reading Airways since 1994 and this is the worst I seen it. For the publisher and editor Enrique Perrella and the rest of the Perrella family (pg.5) Airways is just a play toy; if you remember "Airliners" well he is the same guy that ran that publication out of business.

Really a crossword puzzle?


User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (10 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 8027 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 24):
For the publisher and editor Enrique Perrella and the rest of the Perrella family (pg.5) Airways is just a play toy; if you remember "Airliners" well he is the same guy that ran that publication out of business.

Was the Perella family in charge of Airliners at the time of their demise ?



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 26, posted (10 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 8042 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 24):
#3 - Michael Manning article on Frontier - Factually incorrect that F9 successfully competed with jetBlue and Virgin America. First of all VX doesn't even fly to Denver, and jetBlue is a eastern north-south airline and historically has been as been a non-factor in the Rocky Mountain area.

Yeah, that looks real North-South there, chief...get YOUR facts straight...



Quoting 910A (Reply 24):
Factually incorrect - Frontier had a fortress hub at DEN. I wonder if United, and now Southwest would agree with that. Rule #1 regarding fortress hubs, you have to be the #1 carrier in the the market, which F9 has never been at DEN.

Not necessarily, Frontier had their ONLY hub at Denver, thereby qualifying it as THEIR fortress, with United always being the top spot. For about a year or two, Frontier, was the number one airline in Denver, then United exited Ch. 11, and Southwest entered the market.



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offline910A From United States of America, joined Apr 2015, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (10 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 8065 times:

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 26):
Yeah, that looks real North-South there, chief...get YOUR facts straight...

And what is the total number of east west flights from NY-Boston to Denver, SLC, PHX?

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 26):
Not necessarily, Frontier had their ONLY hub at Denver, thereby qualifying it as THEIR fortress,

There is no such thing as a "THEIR" fortress hub. You either control the hub on not (number of flights, passengers) examples; CVG, DTW, ATL, MSP, SLC all Delta, DFW, MIA American, IAH, EWR United...


User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 28, posted (10 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 8045 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 27):
And what is the total number of east west flights from NY-Boston to Denver, SLC, PHX?

There's over 175 from JFK, BOS, MCO, FLL, and other cities (including the 17 JFK-LAX and 9 JFK-SFO Mint flights).



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offline910A From United States of America, joined Apr 2015, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (10 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 8004 times:

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 28):
Quoting 910A (Reply 27):
And what is the total number of east west flights from NY-Boston to Denver, SLC, PHX?

There's over 175 from JFK, BOS, MCO, FLL, and other cities (including the 17 JFK-LAX and 9 JFK-SFO Mint flights).

Are you just picking numbers out of the air?
Denver has a total of three flights departures, Phoenix two, SLC ABQ both have one going west. So again tell me how jetBlue was in competition against Frontier. Remember I was asking about the Rocky Mountain area (Mountain Time Zone) the home of Frontier.
Since you threw California in the equation,the jetBlue web site shows only 5 flights between SFO -JFK, and 8 between LAX-JFK.


User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 30, posted (10 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 7993 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 29):
Are you just picking numbers out of the air?
Denver has a total of three flights departures, Phoenix two, SLC ABQ both have one going west. So again tell me how jetBlue was in competition against Frontier. Remember I was asking about the Rocky Mountain area (Mountain Time Zone) the home of Frontier.
Since you threw California in the equation,the jetBlue web site shows only 5 flights between SFO -JFK, and 8 between LAX-JFK.

I was throwing in our expansion on JFK transcons after United leaves JFK in Oct, and our eastbounds out of LGB as well.



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 31, posted (10 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 7999 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 24):

The August edition is just a disaster. There is so many mistakes in it, apparently no one edits it.
#1 - pg. 8 The Spirit photo - comment Hughes AirWest was known as the Top Banana in the Sky...no it wasn't it was the Top Banana in the West..

Thanks for reminding me. Gotta bug Enrique on that one.

Quoting alberchico (Reply 25):
Was the Perella family in charge of Airliners at the time of their demise ?

No. Get a copy of Airliners and look at the masthead.

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 26):
Not necessarily, Frontier had their ONLY hub at Denver, thereby qualifying it as THEIR fortress, with United always being the top spot. For about a year or two, Frontier, was the number one airline in Denver, then United exited Ch. 11, and Southwest entered the market.

I think that "fortress hub" is a sadly overused cliche. Maybe NW at MSP, but DEN? It's always had two major airlines competing. Even ATL has still WN providing some competition to DL.


User currently offlinejetxdammit From United States of America, joined Jan 2014, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (9 months 3 weeks ago) and read 7562 times:

It had been a few years but I bought the February issue thinking I may resubscribe, but I found the magazine just lacking for many of the reasons listed above.

One article that irritated me was written by an advertiser (TheDesignAir), and it was a "review" of International First Class cabins. It gave a brief description, with a number ("87 out of 100"), but it had absolutely no criteria spelled out as to how cabins were rated; what the various categories and numbers were to justify the final score. Seemed so arbitrary in the reviews and specifically the number rating, and provided me with zero information. And I paid, what $6 for this?

I expect more out of a magazine like this, and I guess I'll just be renewing my Airliner World subscription.


User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 33, posted (9 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 7294 times:

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 26):
Was the Perella family in charge of Airliners at the time of their demise ?

This stupid rumor from people who refuse to read the masthead simply refuses to die, so in the latest issue of Airways, Enrique tackles it head on. Most people will accept the explanation and move on and I hope the issue finally goes away.

Also, in this issue, they acknowledge the caption error and corrected the Hughes Airwest slogan.

[Edited 2015-07-24 10:20:32]

User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 34, posted (9 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 7116 times:

Quoting psa188 (Reply 33):
This stupid rumor from people who refuse to read the masthead simply refuses to die, so in the latest issue of Airways, Enrique tackles it head on. Most people will accept the explanation and move on and I hope the issue finally goes away.

Also, in this issue, they acknowledge the caption error and corrected the Hughes Airwest slogan.

I would hope so! I actually havent picked up a copy since the May issue with AirTran. I may have to make a trip out to Barnes and Noble and get it again soon.



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offlineTusDawg23 From United States of America, joined May 2010, 222 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (9 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 7060 times:

I've been a subscriber to the magazine for a few years. I really enjoy articles told from the pilot's perspective. One last month was a 747 captain telling his experience of transporting passengers for the Hajj and the craziness of flying through the middle east after an engine failure. I agree with the previous poster that these "top 10" lists they put together are really gimicky and subjective. Best livery, best LCC, etc. I could go without it. The profiles on airports also feel pretty lacking. The rest of the magazine still has some good sections.

User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 36, posted (9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 7045 times:

Quoting TusDawg23 (Reply 35):
The profiles on airports also feel pretty lacking. The rest of the magazine still has some good sections.

We all have our priorities. Personally, I'd prefer that the airport profiles contained more history.

David C. Forward's airline history articles are a winner.


User currently offline910A From United States of America, joined Apr 2015, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (8 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6257 times:

Quoting TusDawg23 (Reply 35):
"top 10" lists they put together are really gimicky and subjective.

I waiting for the top 10 aircraft maintenance facilities..
 
I used to read this magazine as soon was removed from the mail box..This last issue (October) heck it's still August was another major disappointment. So much more could have been done with the E-120 article.

The magazine is awful pricey for a bunch of articles from people without any aviation experience. Enrique wants to appeal to spotters that's his business decision, my decision will be to let the subscription lapse.


User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (8 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 6224 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 37):
The magazine is awful pricey for a bunch of articles from people without any aviation experience. Enrique wants to appeal to spotters that's his business decision, my decision will be to let the subscription lapse.

In their defense it's by far the cheapest aviation magazine available in the U.S. Other euro magazines like air international or airliner world are much more expensive because of the euro/pound to dollar conversion.

Quoting 910A (Reply 37):
I used to read this magazine as soon was removed from the mail box..

Me too. I still have old issues going back to 1995 and wow is there a stark difference.

I know it feels like a victory that they restored the original glossy paper stock but if you think about it all they did was backtrack on a bad decision that they should have never made due to a backlash by subscribers.

[Edited 2015-08-24 18:03:22]

[Edited 2015-08-24 18:07:24]


short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 39, posted (7 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5946 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 37):
The magazine is awful pricey for a bunch of articles from people without any aviation experience.

I dunno about that. I haven't come across any contributor in Airways that doesn't have SOME sort of Airline/Travel experience, yet. Name a few, and I'll stand corrected.



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offlinejetxdammit From United States of America, joined Jan 2014, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5830 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 38):
n their defense it's by far the cheapest aviation magazine available in the U.S. Other euro magazines like air international or airliner world are much more expensive because of the euro/pound to dollar conversion.

Unless you absolutely have to have the paper magazine, the digital one available on iPad/iOS other devices is significantly cheaper at $4.99 an issue (vs. the substantially higher print version).

I've been subscribing digitally, love it, and the new issue always is available on the 10th of every month.


User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 41, posted (7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5793 times:

Quoting jetxdammit (Reply 40):
I've been subscribing digitally, love it, and the new issue always is available on the 10th of every month.

I'm old school so I sort of like the magazine, although there are space considerations if you keep back issues. I think it's a good call to offer the digital version at a discount off the print version since the digital version has none of the printing or distribution costs. E-books are a big turnoff to me both because of pricing and DRM issues.


User currently offline910A From United States of America, joined Apr 2015, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (5 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4349 times:

This month's big boo-boo (January 2016) probably have the staff at American Airlines looking for their missing ten Airbus 330's.

User currently offlinepsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 638 posts, RR: 15
Reply 43, posted (5 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4280 times:

Quoting 910A (Reply 42):
This month's big boo-boo (January 2016) probably have the staff at American Airlines looking for their missing ten Airbus 330's.

For those who have not seen the January issue, could you please elaborate? Thanks.


User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 44, posted (5 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4254 times:

Good God what's happened to the colors in the photos of the last few issues? Looks like they hired Andy Warhol as creative director.


FLYi
User currently offlineF9Animal From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 5593 posts, RR: 17
Reply 45, posted (5 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3813 times:

I used to buy the issues of Airways and Airliners every time I went to Borders books, which was often. Well, they shut the Borders Books that I frequented! I have considered a subscription, and I have been following this thread since it started. I held off due to the complaints, but now I am seeing the new guys have taken steps to better it, and they seem receptive to suggestions.

My question is..... Should I jump in now, and order? I prefer a magazine than a computer screen. I also enjoy my massive collection of the magazines. It's fun to go back to 1998, and read em.



I Am A Different Animal!!
User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5763 posts, RR: 22
Reply 46, posted (9 hours 9 minutes 34 secs ago) and read 26 times:

Quoting F9Animal (Reply 45):
My question is..... Should I jump in now, and order? I prefer a magazine than a computer screen. I also enjoy my massive collection of the magazines. It's fun to go back to 1998, and read em.

I say go for it. I bought the latest issue and like what I see. I'm thinking if they have sorted out their distribution problems and my issues get sent on time and actually show up, I'll re-subscribe.



Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic New Airways Magazine Publisher
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Your Opinion About Airways Magazine? posted Sat Sep 22 2012 16:28:05 by UA767400
Airways Magazine Delayed This Month? posted Mon Aug 6 2012 10:05:59 by alberchico
CX Timetable And Kenya Airways Magazine For Sale posted Thu Apr 3 2008 18:26:25 by YLWbased
Airways Magazine posted Tue Jan 6 2004 06:19:35 by Mckennasmall
Airways Magazine - August 99 posted Thu Aug 3 2000 02:26:58 by Elal106
Airways/Airliners (magazine) For Sale posted Fri Oct 20 2006 04:46:27 by KLM672
100 Airways Magazines For Just $50! posted Mon Jan 28 2013 23:13:40 by alberchico
Aviation Week Vs Flight Global Magazine... posted Tue May 15 2012 12:39:28 by alberchico
Boeing YouTube And Online Photo Archive In Airways posted Thu Apr 12 2012 12:52:55 by CaptainKramer
Slipstream Airways NGX Repaint Video posted Thu Dec 29 2011 14:52:05 by combatshadow

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format