JetBlue320 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0 Posted (14 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 7133 times:
We all know about the Concorde going bye bye, But why didn't Microsoft put an Airbus on FS2002, I am sick of flying Lears, and Boeings, Give us an Airbus where we can actually use the joystick and make us believe we are actually in an Airbus, What do you think guys??? I know there are the downloadable Airbuses, but I want an Airbus from MS already on there.
Cramos From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 554 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 6852 times:
I know what you mean. Afterall, the Concorde was a European built aircraft, so there is all reason to put an Airbus in there. I don't think it has to do with being in WA. I know what you mean with the joystick too. Of course, I still like FS2k2. By the name of JetBlue, it looks like you would really like an airbus being that they are mostly airbus.
EGFF From UK - Wales, joined Sep 2001, 2201 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (14 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6827 times:
Hey! Because Boeing is American and so is 'Microsoft' they see Airbus as there arch-rivals obviously! I think it sucks too that they have no Airbuses, they beat Boeing by far.....Bring on the A330-200
SKYSERVICE_330 From Canada, joined Sep 2000, 1467 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (14 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 6817 times:
Boeing and the Concorde aren't/weren't in direct competition, where Airbus and Boeing are. If Microsoft said they wanted to put an Airbus in FS, Boeing would probably destroy the contract with MS, thus saying that they can't put the 737,777,747 in the game. Probably in the contract saying that MS can't put Airbus AC in.
Apuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3034 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (14 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 6803 times:
Hey, just download an Airbus panel, and Airbus aircraft and some airbus soundfiles. Without any doubt, they're better than the standard aircraft included in MS Flight simulator. It has always been this way...
JetBlue320 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (14 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 6690 times:
I bet if Airbus paid MS more money, that they would ditch Boeing. I really don't like how Boeing is trying to monopolize not only the market, but also trying to monopolize COMPUTER GAMES. There are people in Europe who play this game. As with what DAVID VENZ of Airbus Industrie says. "The 747 is OLDER than Airbus Industrie. It's time for a new airplane, with state of the art technology built from the wheels up, and that is what is going to happen with the A3XX (A380)."
The Paul From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (14 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6691 times:
I bet if Airbus paid MS more money, that they would ditch Boeing.
Was that a joke, or are you really serious? Airbus is a European company, not American. Boeing is American, and so is Microsoft, get the picture?
I really don't like how Boeing is trying to monopolize not only the market, but also trying to monopolize COMPUTER GAMES.
LOL, thanks for that laugh.
As with what DAVID VENZ of Airbus Industrie says. "The 747 is OLDER than Airbus Industrie. It's time for a new airplane, with state of the art technology built from the wheels up, and that is what is going to happen with the A3XX (A380)."
That statement is laughed at by many. The 747 may be an old design, but a lot of the 747s flying today are not old planes. State of the are technology from the wheels up? Uhhh, duh, look at the 747-400 and the 777.
You seem to be dreaming here.
Anyway, the default MS aircraft are usually crap compared to the ones you can get from the web, so why do you care so much?
PPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (14 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 6669 times:
Errr quit your whining and download it from FS.com, their better looking, feature real airlines, and in some cases fly better.
People are saying its the American thing that it's all Boeing, lets not kid our selfs Boeing just has more aircraft out in the field its like me complaining that Cessnas, they only do that because they pay them, it should be all Pipers. Wrong Cessnas are more prevalent and will probally always will be, personally I prefer Pipers, but most people will get their flight training in a Cessna, its the same thing with the Boeings.
Skystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (14 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6646 times:
It's a pity, because the Airbuses have more advanced systems to simulate, in particular the flight envelope protection system and auto trim - which noone has been able to effectively replicate in FSIM. I don't want to start an Airbus/Boeing war, but the automatic systems would be interesting - especially for people first getting used to FS flying.
But, generally speaking the MSFS flight models for the airliners are quite pathetic. Absolute crap for the engines - the spool speeds are back to front (should be very slow initially, then fast once inertia is overcome) and the thrust output at low N1s is far too low - taxi in a real jet is conducted at near idle - ie 23 odd N1.