OO-VEG From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 1081 posts, RR: 1 Posted (11 years 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2109 times:
Just wondering how reliable are those ICAO codes which are being used in FS2002.
I also saw a lot of codes like Z01X etc.. are those kind of codes official or made-up because the airports/strips/fields otherwise wouldn't have a identifying code???
N139j From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 380 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2045 times:
As far as I have seen, the ICAOs are realistic. You will find some like VA45 or something like that for very small airstrips, but thats how it is in real life.
-Jason
N139J
AA_Cam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2026 times:
No, they are mixtures of numbers and letters. The most prominent airports in most countrys have only letters, but the majority of airports worldwide do have numbers. And the numbers and letters do mean something, they aren't just chosen at lot. And yes in FS2002 the numbers are 100% accurite. Want proof, go to a little airport in Ontario called Grimbsby Airpark.... CODE: CNZ8!