Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Realistic FS2002 Screenshots, A Mustsee!  
User currently offlineHoons90 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 3011 posts, RR: 52
Posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 7376 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Here's what lighting settings from photoshop can do  Smile






This is flightsim, this isnt real  Smile




More to Come
All screenshots are copyright Hoons C. (me)


The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 7280 times:

Hi,

thanks for those nice screenshots. Now, I don't want to offend you or so, but apart from the 3rd one or so, they don't really look realistic to me.

I think you added waaayyy too much light, don't you think? And, also, how did you resized your screenshots? The diagonal lines and so are not really straight, they're just more a collection of horizontal lines, you know what I mean?

But, of course, that's just my personal opinion...that's it. Once again, I'm just trying to give you some good advice, instead of offending you...

Ivan



Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineHoons90 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 3011 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 7260 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

I'm sorry about the light thing. But the only way to make the screenshot the most realistic is to add lots of light, otherwise, it would look like regular flightsim. Flightsim is far from real, and it's hard to make the flightsim screenshots realistic.

Thanks.



The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7247 times:

Yea, they really don't look too realistic or anything. Sorry..

User currently offlineVgnAtl747 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 1513 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 7170 times:

Personally, I think they look less realistic than non-edited screen shots.


Work Hard. Fly Right. Continental Airlines
User currently offline9V-SVA From Singapore, joined Aug 2001, 1860 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 7167 times:

Hoons, all the pictures are blurred. Only the VS742 taxiing looks real.

9V-SVA



9V-SVA | B772ER
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 7096 times:

Here is what I call realistic:



Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently onlineTropicalSQ744 From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 260 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7065 times:

WOW! That CX 747 looks exactly like a picture! Great work Wietse! Thanks for sharing it with us! And could you reveal how you did it?  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

TropicalSQ744
SIN/WSSS



DMK(TG773/772) PEN(SQ772/MH734) PER(QF333) PEK(CA763) HKT(MI320) HKG(SQ744) ICN (OZ333), CJU,TAE(OZ734) TPE(3K320) KUL(T
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 7061 times:

Most of it comes down to playing the game in 1600x1200x32. Then I just copied it into Adobe Photoshop 7.0 and applied some sharpening and Auto Colors.

Thanks!
Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineJoakimE From Sweden, joined Nov 2001, 408 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 6970 times:

Another realistic looking one, but without any kind of editing  Smile

http://cerit.dhs.org/~joakime/blandat/archer_essv_taxi.jpg

Dreamfleet Piper Archer II and L&P Visby scenery from FSnordic.net


User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6962 times:


This is about the most realistic one that I have had while playing. I find that in the middle of the day the aircraft and ground textures look too "cartoon" like to be remotely realistic. A lot depends on the original textures too, like most of the posky or Mike Stone aircraft are perfectly clean, which just doesn't happen in reality.

Rgds,
B727-200.



User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 6927 times:

Wietse's not realistic. The colors and sharpness is excellent, but which B747 will take off without flaps? Big grin

Cheers!



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offline9V-SVE From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 2066 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6919 times:

Hey Mr. BA, Flaps slow the plane down...I always want it to go as fast as it can...so I take off without flaps ALWAYS!  Big thumbs up

User currently offlineCrank From Canada, joined May 2001, 1559 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6920 times:

Hey Mr. BA, Flaps slow the plane down...I always want it to go as fast as it can...so I take off without flaps ALWAYS!

if you use no flaps on take off, you have LESS lift, which forces you to use more pavement. takeoff distances will be less if you use 2 or 3 notches of flaps. Flaps slow down the plane a little bit, but when you use them you get up in the air faster than if you wouldn't use them, it also reduces the nose pitch and avoids stalling.


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 14, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6898 times:

Flaps is compulsory for landings and take-offs. It provides more lift at slower speeds. A half load B747-400 might not make it on a 4000m runway without flaps and anyway on the B744 you can't take-off without flaps/flaps at the wrong setting, the computer prevents it. But you can do anything you like with FS!

Cheers VE!



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5516 posts, RR: 18
Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6883 times:



Continental


User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6880 times:

hehehehe, was wondering when someone would notice the flaps thing!!
Actually I started the flight with another aircraft, and changed a/c when just off the ground to give the best shot. But when you change a/c flaps settings are back to default, so the flaps were at 0 again... Big thumbs up

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5516 posts, RR: 18
Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6870 times:

In that BA screenshot I took, I tookoff with 3 notch of flaps (5 degrees) that's the most you should do for liftoff in a 737.

Continental


User currently offlineOmegous From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 293 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 6847 times:

I thought these looked pretty realistic...these are unedited







User currently offlineNW D9S From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 6821 times:

Those are excellent Omegous! Where did you download that Delta MD-80?

User currently offlineOmegous From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 293 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6823 times:

It's actually an MD-90, I think I got it at Flightsim.com but I am not certain.

I do know that it is a FS2000 aircraft, but it works fine in 2k2.


User currently offline9V-SVE From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 2066 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6831 times:

There is a DL MD-90 in the old-old livery at http://www.alliedfsgroup.com
But there is another MD-80, also made and painted by the Allied FS Group in Delta's New-New Livery.


User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5516 posts, RR: 18
Reply 22, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6795 times:

I thought mine was pretty good considering it was unedited and used with MS paint!!!!

Continental


User currently offlineNational_757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6787 times:

Nice shots there Omegous, but get rid of that terrible Delta jet and replace it with some beautiful National 757s, lol  Smile

Take Care,
Richard


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 24, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 6766 times:




cmon, It deserves a plug. I'm bored and it took me ages to fly in circuits until I got this, wasn't paused or in slew or anything, no modifications in photoshop except resizing.

Regards

Dan


25 Post contains images Wietse : wanna see some unedited shots?
26 Post contains images Mr.BA : Hi Wietse, How did you come to make the shots so sharp? They are beautiful! Ahhh I see there are flaps this time alvin
27 Post contains images MD :
28 Post contains images 777-200 : Wing Views
29 Wietse : Dont know, just play the game at the highest res + 32bit colors, then simply resize it to 800xsomething in Photoshop 7. Those wingshots are pretty coo
30 777-200 : Its the Posky 772, if you want the wing views go to Views, View options, Spot plane, Distance: 1 Altitude: 1.
31 777-300 FAN : I have to say, looking at all the FS screenshots i think SharpNfuzzy (i think thats his name) has the best screen shits by a mile, they are awesome. H
32 Wietse : I am ready to get head to head with him once I get my pc back to order. Wietse
33 Squigee : I agree with 777-300 Fan, those "screen shits" are the best!
34 Wietse : hehehehe, didn't see that!, well hes right then, i cant make good screen shits! Wietse
35 Post contains images Wietse : Not to sure about the Spirit of Hong Kong, paintjob not to perfect!!! Wietse
36 777-300 FAN : LOL, sorry, i guess i should proof read now and then. Ah well, easy mistake! Anyway, SharpNfuzzies Screen SHOTS are the best i've seen.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Realistic FS2002 Screenshots, A Mustsee!
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
FS2002 Screenshots...... posted Mon Oct 11 2004 00:05:06 by Chicago757
FS2002/4 Screenshots posted Wed Mar 31 2004 17:09:56 by Pilot kaz
FS2002 Screenshots, How Do Take Them? posted Wed Jul 16 2003 06:56:42 by Cancidas
Post You At-the-gate Fs2002 Screenshots! posted Sun Jun 23 2002 19:00:28 by L'Espace180
FS2002 Screenshots posted Sat May 4 2002 00:21:24 by Airontario
FS2002 Screenshots! posted Fri Feb 15 2002 20:59:24 by Leftseat86
FS2002 Screenshots Courtesy Of Not Me posted Sat Dec 15 2001 00:40:33 by LY772
More FS2002 Screenshots! (100Kb Images) posted Thu Nov 8 2001 22:35:12 by Sharpnfuzzy
A Little Fs2002 Field Trip (screenshots) posted Sun Mar 10 2002 12:29:21 by Mika
FS2002 Gate Screenshots posted Sun Feb 24 2002 04:48:43 by Continental

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format