Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
From FS2K2 To FS2K4 - What Is Your Assessment?  
User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 2
Posted (12 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 8365 times:

G'day all,

Now that FS2K4 has been on a good number of our PC's for a while now, I was wondering what the general concensus is? I am looking for balanced, well weighted and constructive comments regarding MS's latest offering to us av-junkies.

The suggested sections are:

Nice touches, good progression from the previous version, or just the WOW factor.

Could have done more, regressed from previous version, or just poorly conceived/executed ideas.

Taking into account advances in technology and teething of various features, what would you like to see improved or included in FS2K6.

Snapshot of general thoughts (and rating out of 10 if you wish).

Here is my assessment:


It is nice to now fly around my country's airports and have mountains and hills to dodge (I live in Australia). The previous version had a very flat, poor representation of a number of countries, which I am pleased to see improved dramatically. Add to this the improved textures and I think MS have done really well here (particularly those magnificent sunsets).

Improved flight dynamics are really good on this version, particularly combined with the new weather generator. Turbulance now bounces the aircraft around instead of "swinging" it back and forth, which I feel is a great improvement on FS2K2. I don't think I need to say anything more about the visual improvements also put into the weather.

Finally, some of the improvements made to the ATC have been welcomed, particularly when combined with the new GPS. Although, I think you need to be an acrobatic pilot to fly some of those approaches. Attached to the ATC appears to be some smarter AI traffic, who thankfully clear the runway a little faster than in FS2K2.


One thing that really disappointed me in this release was the half complete job MS did on improving airports. For example, the new detailed YSSY (Sydney International) is totally out of scale (still) and has only one heavy parking spot? Why go through the effort of making an airport visually attractive and totally disregarding the technical side?? I know it is a lot of work, but why not at least include a tool so we can edit it ourselves?

Despite the great improvement to the weather, there are two things that have annoyed me on this version. The first is that most airports I land at seem to have low-visibility (I mentioned this in a previous email). The other is the shadows still cast during 100% cloud cover(?). Also, even on the lowest setting the dynamic weather changes too quickly, and there are always clouds being generated in this mode (not always the case in real world).


A couple of things going forward would be nice to see:

- Clouds cast shadows (eliminate aircraft/building shadows in overcast conditions)
- Water spray from wet runways
- In-built tool to edit gates
- Wake turbulance / departure and arrival separation rules for heavy aircraft
- Position and hold after another aircraft has landed
- Speed adjustment on ATC voices so you can speed them up as you get more experienced (and not miss landing clearance because you cannot get a word in).


In summary, I am pretty pleased with my purchase of FS2K4, as it offers enough improvement from FS2K2 to feel like a progression. Out of 10 I would give it a 7, purely because I think they missed a couple of really obvious things.


1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBio15 From Colombia, joined Mar 2001, 1089 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8330 times:

Hi B727-200, I'll try and just give a general summary of my personal viewpoints, mainly based on a matter of taste.


FS2004 has removed the most 'annoying' things of flight out of FS2002. Those were expected since it was the first time serious ATC was established on this popular game. This feature, for the first time, enhanced flight realism instead of scenery realism (which, rather sadly, seems to be the main goal of MS). Air Traffic Control did improve noticeably, as many of us expected. It has the following good improvements:
  • FL change requests available in the air

  • IFR clearance requests available in the air

  • "Taxi into position and hold" command

  • VFR unavailability subject to weather

  • Re-filing destination airport in-flight

  • The availability of requesting published instrument approaches

  • Progressive taxi no longer being a radio communication (That really annoyed me!)

  • Intermediate climb altitude granted when receiving IFR clearance

  • Multiple runway usage

  • One of the things that I wish could be improved further, is aircraft realism. The aircraft seem to be exactly the same as those in FS2002, with some additions in the VR-cockpit view, and the ability to handle switches from the VR. However, as a simple example, starting up the aircraft is just a matter of turning the start switch and activating fuel flow. The pneumatic and hydraulic systems could be added. A basic overhead panel with simple pneumatic and hydraulic systems would be a good start. Suggestion:

    For pneumatics:
  • Starting with battery ON/OFF switch

  • An APU started with battery power (which would eat up fuel and provide pneumatic & electric power)

  • Possible Air conditioning switch ON/OFF (only works when APU is running)

  • Start valves only work when APU is running and supplying air

  • For hydraulics:
  • ON/OFF switches for the hydraulic systems, only work when there's electric power

  • If hydraulics are off the control surfaces won't work and there's no brake pressure

  • It's a simple first-step improvement to make the flight simulation experience more realistic.

    Finally, I would have liked to see additional improvements on the ground control at the airports. It was a very good thing to see taxiway and runway markings, reducing the need to ask for progressive taxi. However the pushback procedure could be further enhanced by including ground communications such as request for pushback, and a small standard chat with the ramp guys just asking for removing the Parking Brake, etc. Parking spots could be made more clear to the simmer so there's no need to activate the pink progressive-taxi line at all when parking.

    I do believe the FS2004 was beautiful. The scenery is just outstanding, and weather has improved a lot as well. I usually never complain about scenery because it seems OK to me. Again, it is a matter of taste and I would have preferred improvements on the actual Flight Simulation experience, which did very well with the ATC improvements.

    How many of you would opt for Fsim improvements rather than scenery? Just as a matter of survey. If you got all the way down to here, thanks for reading  Smile

    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    Reply To This Topic From FS2K2 To FS2K4 - What Is Your Assessment?
    No username? Sign up now!

    Forgot Password? Be reminded.
    Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
    • Aviation hobby related posts only.
    • Back all your opinions with facts.
    • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
    • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
    • Do not post copyright protected material.
    • Use relevant and describing topics.
    • Check if your post already been discussed.
    • Check your spelling!
    Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

    Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    What Is Your Favorite FS2k2 Pilot Voice? posted Tue Sep 23 2003 04:39:07 by Venuscat2
    What Is Your Most Favorite FS2k2 Commercial Addon? posted Thu Aug 29 2002 09:47:14 by Yukee
    What Is Your Next Flight On FS? posted Fri Aug 27 2004 21:20:10 by N754AN
    World Air Routes - What Is Your Favourite DVD? posted Fri Dec 12 2003 20:03:50 by Ryanair737
    What Is Your Favorite Airline Model You Own posted Sun Dec 7 2003 17:17:59 by AATriple7
    What Is Your Best Looking 1:400 posted Fri Nov 9 2001 01:30:27 by BelPilot
    What Is Your Rares Or Oddest Safetycard? posted Mon Mar 27 2000 04:19:00 by Heavy747
    What Is Top On Your Kit Wishlists? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 02:32:38 by MartinairYYZ
    What Is In Your Hangar? Vol.2 posted Fri Nov 4 2005 03:37:18 by Komododx
    What Is In Your Hangar? posted Mon Jan 31 2005 21:47:34 by Komododx
    What Is Your Rares Or Oddest Safetycard? posted Mon Mar 27 2000 04:19:00 by Heavy747
    Is It Worth Downgrading From FSX To 2004? posted Thu Oct 28 2010 03:28:43 by virginblue4
    What Is The Best Up-to-date Military Flight Sim? posted Sun Jan 27 2008 22:40:23 by NicoEDDF
    What Is Top On Your Kit Wishlists? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 02:32:38 by MartinairYYZ

    Sponsor Message:
    Printer friendly format