Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hogan Wings V. Skymarks V. Long Prosper  
User currently offlineChuj From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 58 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 10753 times:

Hi all,

Any insight on the best airline model manufacturers from this group:

Hogan Wings v. Skymarks v. Long Prosper (Flight Miniatures) v. Wooster v. any others that belong in this category of models (there are so many different companies making them now)

I'd be interested to hear about the strengths and weaknesses of each manufacturer. Thanks in advance for any insight!

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3813 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 10716 times:

If 1:200 is the scale in question, Hogan Wings is clearly the best among the 3 manufacturers named. Among the reasons: Hogan Wings have the most accurate overall appearance and a higher standard of manufacture; landing gear is also available for Hogan Wings models (and is included with some). Even so, basic details are mostly non-existent on Hogan Wings 1:200 models, though a "step up" from Skymarks and Long Prosper. All in all, when compared to models from the other two manufacturers mentioned in this topic, Hogan Wings are well worth a few extra dollars.

The main strengths of Skymarks and Long Prosper are accurate airline markings. Beyond that, the models are recognizeable as to the aircraft type, but not much more IMHO, other than their low pricetag.

In the 1:200 range of finished models, StarJets and Herpa are both vastly superior to Hogan Wings, Skymarks and Long Prosper. The difference in quality is well worth the difference in price (about $10-15 more for narrowbodies, $20-30 more for widebodies). Unfortunately StarJets has announced that their 1:200 line has been discontinued due to poor sales.

User currently offlineTriJetFan1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1128 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 10787 times:

Long prosper has large range, but hogan is the best quality. I wish they had more of a selection. Hogan has gear, that takes the cake. Skymarks however, makes a great A-380. E-mail/post me any questions for anymore info on 1:200, I have a lot of these and I know a lot about them.

Earned PPL June 26, 2007
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Hogan Wings V. Skymarks V. Long Prosper
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Hogan Wings Concorde posted Fri Feb 17 2006 18:37:35 by HB88
Whats Your Long Prosper/Wooster/1:200 Fleet? posted Sun May 23 2004 02:24:43 by TriJetFan1
Long Prosper 1/130 747 posted Thu Feb 12 2004 04:27:53 by 3lions
Hogan Wings Questions - Landing Gear, Regos posted Tue Feb 25 2003 04:49:46 by VirginFlyer
Long Prosper Snap-Fits For Sale posted Tue Oct 29 2002 22:52:46 by LAX
Long Prosper On The Web? posted Sun Sep 30 2001 13:57:42 by DC-10 Levo
Long Prosper posted Fri Sep 7 2001 04:43:50 by Timbo
Long Prosper's Desk Models posted Wed Jul 25 2001 04:23:31 by Mirrodie
Long Prosper L-1011s posted Wed Mar 14 2001 23:18:43 by TurboTristar
2 Long Prosper Models For Sale! posted Sat Feb 10 2001 04:02:08 by 767ALLTHEWAY

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format