Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Geforce Users - The Answer To Better Frame-rates?  
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4330 times:

I thought it was worth passing this on. NVIDIA have brought out a better driver, which they claim sorts out 'anomalies' with FS2004 (NOW they tell us  Smile). I just downloaded the update and can't believe the results. With the target frame-rate set at 'unlimited' I was getting framerates in the high twenties even in ten/tenths cloud. In clear weather the 'record' was 37. And I only have the MX400.......

Available from here if you're interested. Hope it does the same for you.

http://www.nvidia.com/content/drivers/drivers.asp


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAih033 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4306 times:

Is it the 61.77 version?


Happy Flying!
User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4271 times:

Hmm, I downloaded and installed the new driver and tested FS out but I didn't really see any great improvements, except maybe when I was in flight with relatively light clouds. At airports and with heavy cloud I was only getting frame rates in the teens.

Do I have to do anything other than just install the driver? What are your other FS graphics settings?

Thanks,

-Q



Long live the A330!
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 4176 times:

Hope it helps a bit, anyway, Q330.

I don’t do anything special on ‘Settings’, mainly because nothing I do seems to make much difference! So I leave most of them at ‘default’ – the exceptions being the resolution (I use 1024X768) and the frame-rate (I set that at ‘unlimited’ by moving the slider all the way to the right – can’t see the point of pegging the rate). 'Realism' set to 'Hard'.

Your comment gave me the idea of some research into whether different aeroplanes present different frame-rates. When I first noticed the improvement I was ‘flying’ a B25. This is a model of an actual Mitchell that is still flying at the Mid-Atlantic Air Museum in Pennsylvania. It is the most exquisitely detailed model I’ve seen, and is usually pretty ‘hungry’ for frames:-

http://virtual.planepictures.net/show.cgi?35295

I called up a practice landing approach I keep saved, which has pretty cloudy weather, and tried the Mitchell out. Not bad – rates in the range 18-26. Then I switched in flight to another favourite, a Comet 4 – and got 23-27. Then to a VC10, not so good here, high teens-early twenties.

Finally I switched back to the original aeroplane, the FS default 737. This was the result!



Maybe we can set up a competition – can anybody beat a frame-rate of 47.9 in cloudy weather?  Smile

From all this I conclude that the frame-rates you get seem to be very much dependent on which aeroplane you are using, and the skill of the designer. Makes sense really – it looks as if the game takes whatever resources it needs to run a given model (highly detailed designs/panels presumably needing more) and what is left over determines the frame-rate. The default aeroplanes are pretty simple designs and therefore achieve higher frame-rates.

Tony




"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4165 times:

Hey NAV20, thanks for your reply. I currently have my 'global scenery quality' on ultra high so maybe that's what's slowing it down a bit. I just tested it on medium high and I was getting frames around 20 at busy YSSY. Out of curiosity, what is your global scenery quality slider set to?

Yes, the default aircraft are certainly pretty easy on frames, but they're hard on the eyes!  Laugh out loud

-Q



Long live the A330!
User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4109 times:


I got a slight improvement with my FX5200 - mostly through the elimination of some bugs that were there.

- I could not 'grab' and rotate the aircraft manually in the 'Select Aircraft' screen
- Foggy conditions would usually result in almost a white wall about 1NM from the aircraft (could be fixed by toggling between wondow and full-screen modes)
- Occasional flickering would occur, particularly when the ATC window was open

The driver update seems to have fixed these. I have noticed slightly better performance in general scenery, but clouds still bring things to a halt.


User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4106 times:

Yes, B727-200, clouds are a problem - especially the 'fluffy' cumulus stuff. Doesn't help that the 'real weather' everywhere seems to be uniformly lousy at the moment. If I get really bad problems at key times (like taking off or landing) I have taken to pressing 'Alt/Enter' and reverting to the smaller screen for a while. That helps the frame-rate a lot, but of course spoils the 'look'.

Glad the new driver seemed to sort some problems out for you. You do wonder, though - presumably they knew for ages that their cards had bugs when used for FS2004, but went on selling them to us mugs.......

Q330, yes, my global scenery is set to 'Medium High', which is the default on my computer.



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4084 times:

I'm afraid that there may be a problem.

I just tried to run FS2002 - not only would it not run, clicking on the desktop icon crashed my system and I had to do a 'registry restore' to get the thing out of Safe Mode. I uninstalled FS2002 and re-installed it, but the same thing happened.

This doesn't bother me as I can do without FS2002, and almost never use it. In any case, it may be some other problem, unconnected with the new driver. But it's only fair to say that, if you want to keep both games, it might be best not to try the new driver.



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineNed Kelly From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4025 times:

I have a problem with the new driver. I installed the new driver & everything was ok for a while(about an hour). Then I started to have problems with the panel, the panel now fills up almost the whole screen (640 size mode?). I usually use 1024x768x16 screen size. I rolled back the driver & every thing was OK, then I reinstalled the new driver, same problem again.

Can anyone think what is causing this problem? Is there anything I need to edit in the FS9.cfg file?

Ned.


User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 9, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4025 times:

Haven't had any problems this end, 'Ned'.

One thing, though - set the 1024X768 resolution on the game settings page, not on the driver control panel. I had a 'crashing' problem with the GeForce card when I first got it, because I changed its settings - it's best to leave it at the defaults it sets for itself and just change the game settings.




"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineNed Kelly From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4023 times:

Nav20,

Thanks for that tip. I will try that when I get home. Another thing to add, it is only the panel that I am having the problem with, all the other views are OK & are dispaying at 1024x768. I also only have this problem when operating in full screen mode, when I have the menu bar displayed whilst flying (ALT+Enter), the panel is OK.

Ned.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Geforce Users - The Answer To Better Frame-rates?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Do You Get FS2002 To Display Frame Rates? posted Tue Jan 1 2002 18:04:26 by Dlx737200
FS2002:Better Frame Rates? posted Sun Jun 3 2001 09:01:55 by FP_v2
The Best Frame Rates For FS2004 posted Mon Oct 6 2003 16:20:32 by B752fanatic
Need Help From GeForce Users With The Blurries posted Tue Aug 20 2002 02:56:37 by B777
Horrible FS2004 Frame Rates While On Ground. posted Tue Apr 18 2006 22:08:53 by VgnAtl747
Odd Panel Frame Rates posted Wed Apr 5 2006 14:27:04 by CVGpilot
Frame Rates In FS9 posted Mon Mar 20 2006 20:26:42 by RobTrent
Fussy About Frame Rates?Me? posted Sun Jan 22 2006 18:45:00 by LawrenceMck
FS Frame Rates posted Thu Apr 28 2005 07:58:10 by 9VSRH
Frame Rates And Slewing? posted Fri Aug 20 2004 05:11:18 by MaverickM11

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format