Sponsor Message:
Aviation Hobby Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fussy About Frame Rates?Me?  
User currently offlineLawrenceMck From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 311 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4708 times:

Hey A-Netters.

I'm a guy who likes everything perfect, especially when it comes to Flight Simming. When I fly, I constantly have to press shift+Z to take a look at the frame rates. When they drop below 20fps, I conscider this as jerky, all my friends say I'm being daft. I must admit, I seem to be concentrating more on fps rather than the actual flying itself. So what do you class as jerky when it comes to Frame Rates? Am I being too fussy or what?

Thanks

Lawrence  Wink


Love It To Live It
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2788 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4708 times:

I can't get my FPS above 15.01 so your lucky !  Wink


No info
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4702 times:

Quoting LawrenceMck (Thread starter):

I'm a guy who likes everything perfect, especially when it comes to Flight Simming. When I fly, I constantly have to press shift+Z to take a look at the frame rates. When they drop below 20fps, I conscider this as jerky, all my friends say I'm being daft. I must admit, I seem to be concentrating more on fps rather than the actual flying itself. So what do you class as jerky when it comes to Frame Rates? Am I being too fussy or what?

that sounds COMPLETELY like me Big grin

I HATE when the framerate gets even below 25. 25 pictures per second is what is needed for the human eye to see it as a smooth rendering.

I can get my fps all the way up to 70 during night flying and all the way down to 20 when I am in an airport like ORD. I tried installing an SXM scenery on my computer but it totally killed the framerate. It dropped all the way down to 8 fps.


User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4693 times:

Well, I have it limited to 30, and only on the huge sceneries will it go a bit down. I really dont mind if it goes below the teens, as I never fly from the outside and when running down the runway even when it gets in the teens it's not that noticeable, only when you make long lateral (sideways) movements is when it is really noticeable.

User currently offlineAC21365 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4676 times:

Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 2):

Mine goes down to 20 in the most densely populated areas and areas with aftermarket sceneries (boston, cleveland, phoenix). I too can't get more than 9fps at TNCM (Princess Juliana/Saint Marteen).

The thing I dislike most about FS9, is that it was written in late 2004, WAY before any of the newest video card features were even concieved. Most of today's games are more dependant on the graphics processor. I get the same framerates when Anti-aliasing and Antistropic Filtering are on and off, which tells me the framerates are limited only by the processor, and not the graphics card. I'm experimenting with overclocking my new chip over the next week or two, so I'll take screenshots of the same place at different clock speeds.

I DO look forward to FS10, which will (hopefully) take advantage of the newest graphics card features (Pixelshader 3, SLI), as well as support multithreaded (dual core) cpu's.

-Aaron

[Edited 2006-01-22 22:08:36]

User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4670 times:

Quoting AC21365 (Reply 4):

okay.. well I have a pentium 4, 3,2 ghz processor, so if what you're saying is true, it means that I don't have to concider a new graphicscard until the new version of fs is released? I currently have an ATI x600, 256mb ddr ram, which came with the computer.


User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4664 times:

Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 5):
okay.. well I have a pentium 4, 3,2 ghz processor, so if what you're saying is true, it means that I don't have to concider a new graphicscard until the new version of fs is released? I currently have an ATI x600, 256mb ddr ram, which came with the computer.

Technically you shouldn't need a new card, but IF and only IF the guys at FS do the smart thing and rewrite the graphics engine so it looks better without need of a much more powerful PC. Do you have an HT processor? Also I'd trash the X600 and get an X800 at least.


User currently offlineAC21365 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4663 times:

If I was you, I'd go with an Nvidia card. ATI's still using the old Pixelshader 2.0, while Nvidia went with Pixelshader 3.0. 3.0 is WAY better for effects and such.

Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 6):
Technically you shouldn't need a new card, but IF and only IF the guys at FS do the smart thing and rewrite the graphics engine so it looks better without need of a much more powerful PC.

I sure hope microsoft writes in pixelshader 3.0 support for FSX. The lighting and special effects will be unheard of if they did. Imagine, dynamic heat blurr, accurate light dispersion over distances, light glow, etc.etc.

I would wait to upgrade your video card until closer to release time, because, chances are, they'll write some new effects engine before FSX is released, and they'll build it into FSX, and you'll need an even newer video card to take advantage of those effects.

-Aaron


User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4943 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4652 times:

I managed about 5-10 today whilst transiting ORD in FS2004! But 20 FPS there? I don't know if I could afford a comp that could achieve that!


Scotty doesn't know...
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4633 times:

Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 6):
Do you have an HT processor?

Sorry if this is a stupid question but whats an HT processor?

Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 6):
Also I'd trash the X600 and get an X800 at least.

I agree! I have noticed that my x600 is very bad at rendering the clouds in fs. When I add 3d clouds to fs, it starts lagging a lot, which is a shame because the 3d clouds are really well done in fs, and they add a lot to the realism.


User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4632 times:

Quoting AC21365 (Reply 7):
If I was you, I'd go with an Nvidia card. ATI's still using the old Pixelshader 2.0, while Nvidia went with Pixelshader 3.0. 3.0 is WAY better for effects and such.

Okay, maybe I'll go for an Nvidia instead. I used to have a Ti4200 64 mb ddr ram which was the best graphics card you could get at the time I bought it. I was really happy about it too.


User currently offlineLawrenceMck From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4626 times:

Some interesting replies here guys, keep 'em coming!

 bigthumbsup 

Lawrence



Love It To Live It
User currently offlineNASOCEANA From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 291 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4625 times:

I usually lock my FPS at 35 to 40 with no problem!


B777 greatest Airliner ever built!
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4622 times:

It's called being a framerate junky and it's a very common disease among FS punters.

Either you get over it and vow to never use that framerate counter again or your enjoyment of FS will be forever ruined.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13596 posts, RR: 61
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4620 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 13):
Either you get over it and vow to never use that framerate counter again or your enjoyment of FS will be forever ruined.

Agreed!  checkmark 

I found myself checking my framerate counter - 10FPS at major airports with most goodies turned on and full AI running. I quickly decided a new video card was in order.

Several hundred dollars later on a 256MB GeForce 6800GS PCI Express plus new power supply, and my framerates at major airports with ALL sliders maxed and all goodies turned on and full AI running comes in at 20-25FPS on the ground, and averaging 45FPS at altitude - hitting my 80FPS lock with night flying.

But yet, I find that I'm STILL checking my framerate counter! It's almost always on.

To me, it's beginning to ruin the experience. So I'm resolving to avoid using the counter entirely. Call it a late New Year's resolution, if you will.  Smile



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineAC21365 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4618 times:

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 14):
But yet, I find that I'm STILL checking my framerate counter! It's almost always on.

Boy do I feel your pain!! But I use mine for a good reason, I can see the awesome framerates in complex scenery!! w00t

See the screenshot thread #16 for my system specs and some shots of what my machine's capable of.

-Aaron


User currently offlineDelboy From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 725 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4603 times:

Oh Jwenting, how true that is.

I always fly with the frame rate showing and I am constantly looking to see what I am acheiving. I have mine locked at 30fps, which I can get most of the time in flight. It does drop when on approach and landing but not sufficiently to cause me too many problems.

I really must lose the habit of displaying it though!!


User currently offlineLawrenceMck From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4599 times:

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 13):
It's called being a framerate junky and it's a very common disease among FS punters.

Thank God there's a name for my condition lol.
Thanks for all your re-assurance guys, I just dream of the day where I can keep my fps above 30fps!

 Big grin

Lawrence



Love It To Live It
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 18, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4591 times:

Is it better to lock the framerates? I mean does it stress the graphicscard less?

User currently offlineJetflyer From Netherlands, joined Aug 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4587 times:

I have it locked at 30fps also and it's OK to use 100% AI traffic at smaller airports although if I go to large ones like LHR or JFK I lower AI percentage to 20%. My computer's frame rates aren't the problem as much as st-u-tt-ering is.

User currently offlineJamesbuk From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 3968 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4581 times:

Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 18):
AirPacific747

i have my frames on 100 and in flight i achieve around 80 so id get rid of the lock so put it to 100 or unlimeted and you'll get better frame rates (hopfully)


Rgds --James--



You cant have your cake and eat it... What the hells the point in having it then!!!
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 21, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4580 times:

Quoting Jamesbuk (Reply 20):
i have my frames on 100 and in flight i achieve around 80 so id get rid of the lock so put it to 100 or unlimeted and you'll get better frame rates (hopfully)

ahh okay thanks. Its already on unlimited framerates, but I was just wondering.


User currently offlineYooYoo From Canada, joined Nov 2003, 6057 posts, RR: 50
Reply 22, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4580 times:

Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 18):
Is it better to lock the framerates? I mean does it stress the graphicscard less?

I've heard that once the computer reaches the target FPS, the computers resouces can then be guided eleswhere.

I have my targeted at 25 FPS.

I consider it jerky at around 10 fps.



I am so smart, i am so smart... S-M-R-T... i mean S-M-A-R-T
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fussy About Frame Rates?Me?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Aviation hobby related posts only.
  • Back all your opinions with facts.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Horrible FS2004 Frame Rates While On Ground. posted Tue Apr 18 2006 22:08:53 by VgnAtl747
Odd Panel Frame Rates posted Wed Apr 5 2006 14:27:04 by CVGpilot
Frame Rates In FS9 posted Mon Mar 20 2006 20:26:42 by RobTrent
FS Frame Rates posted Thu Apr 28 2005 07:58:10 by 9VSRH
Geforce Users - The Answer To Better Frame-rates? posted Mon Sep 20 2004 14:21:04 by NAV20
Frame Rates And Slewing? posted Fri Aug 20 2004 05:11:18 by MaverickM11
Stock AI Frame Rates posted Fri Jul 2 2004 17:54:00 by CVGpilot
Improving Frame Rates In FS2K4. posted Wed Dec 31 2003 10:06:56 by Crank
Question About Airline 5 Help ME! posted Sat Dec 13 2003 10:12:49 by Galvanair777
Frame Rates - FS2004 posted Sun Nov 30 2003 16:33:12 by EGFFbmi

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format