Mir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 22485 posts, RR: 55
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 7154 times:
Quoting YEGspotter (Reply 4): I'm betting for the simplicity of use for the default GPS - it's very easy to use, whereas the FMC takes some time to learn....
Forgive me for saying so, but IMHO, using the default GPS in the Level-D is like buying a champion racehorse and then cutting its legs off.
FMCs really aren't that hard to learn - take a few hours now and it'll make your flights a lot more enjoyable than just going direct with the GPS. You paid for the panel, and the FMC is a big part of that.
But that's just me.
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
A3204eva From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1060 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7138 times:
The FMC is much more realistic than DCT GPS, as a real 767 (or any comercial a/c) certainly wouldn't route DCT GPS. They route via waypoints/VORs and airways as well as using SIDs/STARs where applicable
It doesn't take too long to learn, and adds a lot to your experience if trying to be realistic. Especially if you plan on doing it later in the real world
"They have lady pilots......... they're not that good, but they have 'em"