Ajd1992 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 12988 times:
I've had mine upto about 120 - that was with no antivirus, no MSN, no portable firefox... just FS2002 (as it was at the time, i'm now on FS2004. I haven't checked on FS2004). To be honest, it's not something i wanna do often, having no antivirus. Usually, i average about 30-50 flying, at bigger airports with AI at it's highest, plus with some added AI (can't remember the name of the program, damn it..) i get 20 or so. Pretty good for a system that's coming up on 2 years old (granted, it's had a gig of RAM, 120GB HDD added to it's original 40GB (!!) one.)
Avsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2 Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 12645 times:
Nice to see the stats that everyone is getting with FS9, but the real question is....what are the specs for each of your computers? If you have a top of the line CPU with High-end dual PCI Express videos cards, then you will get high FPS. If someone is still running a low-end CPU and video card, then they will suffer with FPS. Lets see those computer specs to go along with mentioning FPS.
"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
JohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1381 posts, RR: 6 Reply 18, posted (7 years 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 12529 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
I usually get around 15 fps at dense airports like LAX, 30-50 fps at CPH and 50+ in some sandy desert in Angola
I run FS on a clean stripped down Windows XP with PC-Cillin as only stuff not FS related, meaning that I have 2 separate XP installs on one computer.
Specs as follows:
P4 3.2GHz 800FSB
2x512 DDR400 in dual channel
2x80GB 8MB cache 7200rpm WD HDD in RAID
ASUS Ti4400 Ultra (oldest thing in my rig)
5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1