Print from Airliners.net discussion forum http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/aviation_photography/read.main/258358/ |
Topic: Which One Should I Go For Next? Username: San747 Posted 2006-11-06 00:39:17 and read 2255 times.I'm a little disappointed about this rejection (quality):
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ain?filename=20061105_IMG_1261.jpg
But, alas, I will move on... I have a couple other shots that I'm confident of, but I only have one upload slot now available... Which one looks like it has the best chance?





Thank you all! |
Topic: RE: Which One Should I Go For Next? Username: D L X Posted 2006-11-06 01:46:14 and read 2237 times.I think all those shots are soft. What editing are you doing? I'd add a bit of USM. |
Topic: RE: Which One Should I Go For Next? Username: FlightShadow Posted 2006-11-06 03:50:34 and read 2215 times.Of all of those I would pick the American Eagle Saab. All the others have some quality issues, but I think the Saab stands a chance. |
Topic: RE: Which One Should I Go For Next? Username: TedTAce Posted 2006-11-06 03:56:21 and read 2213 times.Personally I don't like the aft quartering shots with the sun setting from behind the A/C. Seems like the shots have more a 'hey it was the end of the day and I didn't fell like working' type of attitude then a professional photographer trying to take quality shots. |
Topic: RE: Which One Should I Go For Next? Username: San747 Posted 2006-11-06 07:26:03 and read 2181 times.Quoting FlightShadow (Reply 2): Of all of those I would pick the American Eagle Saab... I think the Saab stands a chance. |
I'll bet the fact that there is only 1 other shot of that particular airframe on the DB will help, won't it? I'll go for it...
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3): Personally I don't like the aft quartering shots with the sun setting from behind the A/C. Seems like the shots have more a 'hey it was the end of the day and I didn't fell like working' type of attitude then a professional photographer trying to take quality shots. |
I took those shots because of the great lighting at the time... I'm no professional (yet), but I'm trying to be given my limitations...
Quoting D L X (Reply 1):
I think all those shots are soft. What editing are you doing? I'd add a bit of USM. |
I edit with Photoshop Elements 2.0. I tried some additional USM on the F9 landing shot and it got some mad jaggies, so I'm kind of reluctant to try it on the other shots...
|
The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved. http://www.airliners.net/ |