Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/aviation_photography/read.main/377456/

Topic: Which Lens?
Username: chriswade
Posted 2012-11-17 15:05:08 and read 4973 times.

ok so i bought the 70-300L IS USM and i love it! but now im wishing i had more distance! so stick with the 70-300 or go the 100-400? ive heard the quality and sharpness is less in the 100-400 and obviously you cant go any lower than 100mm but you get the extra 100mm and can be used with the 1.4 extender! grrrr im so torn between the 2  

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: Silver1SWA
Posted 2012-11-17 15:17:31 and read 4973 times.

Well, the 100-400 can get quite soft at the long end so in many situations I never felt comfortable going over 300. The IS system on the 70-300 is far superior allowing you to use it comfortably in less light. I never had much success with TCs on the 100-400. You need a lot of light and not sure about the 1.4 but with the 2x you lose AF.

I'd stick with the 70-300L.

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: NPeterman
Posted 2012-11-17 17:42:08 and read 4973 times.

I'm not advocating jumping ship from the 70-300L per se, but I have shot with my 100-400 on bodies ranging from entry-level Rebels up to a 7D now, and while it is no EF 400mm F2.8, I have never hesitated to zoom out all the way out to 400mm for a shot. Assuming you have it stopped down a bit (F7.1-F9) it has always done just fine for me. I know some people have had issues like crazy with their copies, and I was one of them for a while, but after micro-adjusting the AF, I was golden.

I have heard the 70-300L is quite nice however. Don't bother with converters on the 100-400, it's a lost cause. You're better off getting a EF 400mm F5.6 and cropping at that point, which I did when the 100-400 was misbehaving, although I rarely use it nowadays

N Peterman

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: NZ107
Posted 2012-11-17 18:35:52 and read 4973 times.

Quoting NPeterman (Reply 2):
Assuming you have it stopped down a bit (F7.1-F9) it has always done just fine for me.

Same here - worked wonders for me. I feel as though my copy is good but it also comes down to atmospheric conditions.

Ask yourself how much you shoot in the 70-100mm range and if you'd benefit more from having either the 30mm at the wide end or 100mm at the tele end.

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-11-17 19:29:50 and read 4973 times.

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 3):
Ask yourself how much you shoot in the 70-100mm range and if you'd benefit more from having either the 30mm at the wide end or 100mm at the tele end.

Agreed. But also keep in mind that a 30mm difference between 70 and 100 is a magnification factor of 1.43, while a 100mm difference between 300 and 400 is a magnification factor of 1.33. So 30mm at the short end makes more of a difference, zoom-wise, than 100mm at the long end, though it's pretty close. Ultimately it's up to you and what you need.

Wait, just to check, you have the 70-300 IS USM, or the 70-300 L IS USM? I ask because I read your post wrongly the first time.

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: NZ107
Posted 2012-11-17 19:56:30 and read 4973 times.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 4):
Wait, just to check, you have the 70-300 IS USM, or the 70-300 L IS USM? I ask because I read your post wrongly the first time.

The white one  

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: chriswade
Posted 2012-11-17 21:50:04 and read 4973 times.

Yes the white one :P the L series

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: chriswade
Posted 2012-11-18 08:40:17 and read 4973 times.

Been to manchester today and im sticking to the 70-300. even at 70 i couldnt fit some of the big uns in.

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: JakTrax
Posted 2012-11-18 09:45:46 and read 4973 times.

Chris,

Hope MAN was up to expectations. Next time you need to do a weekday as it will be busier!

The images certainly looked sharp on your preview screen, but feel free to send a few over.

Karl

Topic: RE: Which Lens?
Username: chriswade
Posted 2012-11-18 15:02:42 and read 4973 times.

Thanks Karl i loved every minute of it. busy compared to what im used to and such a variety. will defo be up there very soon again.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/