Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/aviation_photography/read.main/53724/

Topic: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: APP
Posted 2002-06-26 00:40:33 and read 2582 times.

I can't afford to go digital or get a slide scanner at the moment, therefore I need to stick with 100ASA colour print film.
I'm looking for opinions and advice about which film performs the best overall for aviation photography. I know everyone will have their favourites, so I'd be interested to hear what you've all got to say....it could end up as a poll!!!
So, what's it to be; Fuji Reala, Kodak Supra, or Kodak Royal Gold?
Thanks in advance,
APP.

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: CcrlR
Posted 2002-06-26 01:46:59 and read 2526 times.

I used all three and the Kodak Supra 100 and Gold 100 work better than the reala in low light, sunlight, and other conditions. The Reala was worse. I was on a UA lfight and I took a picture of the engine while we were at cruise speed and when it came out it was all purple but I used Kodak Gold on the flight back and they came out good even in bad weather. Same thing for the Supra 100. I used it in cloudy weather and it worked good. Mostly the Reala did poor in cloudy conditions but both Kodak films did good.

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: BO__einG
Posted 2002-06-26 06:15:34 and read 2534 times.

Supra is the best film in the world!!!!

Reala is okay but there are noticable problems.

Kodak GOLD isd Grainier than the wheatfields of Alberta! Horrible but some off times it is excellent.

Bo

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: Wietse
Posted 2002-06-26 08:26:03 and read 2524 times.

I suspect influence from your developing lab here. I've heard Reala is hard to develop/scan. Once you find a good lab, you will have the best print film in the whole wide world.  Laugh out loud

Seriously again, I've shot 20+ rolls of reala on all kinds of things, and the were all perfect, much more balanced than the colors of Kodak Gold 100. I seriously cannot find any grain in my pictures.

Bad in low light conditions? Dull weather is especially the time reala shines!
Try this with Gold or Supra:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf



And the colors:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf



In my opinion Reala is the best print film in the world, but I will be transferring to Slides soon, probably Provia 100F. (sorry tim... Smile)

Wietse

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: TimdeGroot
Posted 2002-06-26 09:14:00 and read 2510 times.

I've used Kodak Supra 100 for a few years and I absolutely loved it.
Although I have never used Reala, which is supposed to be good as well, Supra is far superior to any other films like Royal Gold or Superia.

But whatever film you choose be sure to pay plenty for developing, that's where the real win in quality is. Good developing and processing is the key to a good print. It can be very expensive though, and that's one reason why I've changed to slides (K64). Actually Wietse I have a roll of Provia that I'm going to try out one of these days. Smile
I might start using it for actionshots in lower light conditions, or maybe even sun when I like it.

Tim

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: Staffan
Posted 2002-06-26 18:25:41 and read 2488 times.

Used Reala and I liked it very much, used Royal Gold 400 and it sucked when scanned. Never tried Supra.

Staffan

Topic: RE: Reala 100 Vs Supra 100 Vs Royal Gold 100
Username: APP
Posted 2002-06-26 23:13:30 and read 2467 times.

Thanks for the replies, I think I'll give the Supra a go, It's very reasonably priced on 7dayshop.com
Cheers,
APP.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/