Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 15 Posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4218 times:
i normally never complain about a rejection, cause i normally understand the reason, even if i see it different ... , where would we end up, if everybody is going to appeal its rejections ..... , but this one is totally different ....
The following photos were rejected:
(Please read more below)
- OE-IEL.jpg (Tyrolean Jet Services Bombardier BD-700-1A10 Global Express)
The photos were of low esthetic qualities - bad angle, included
window reflections (for shots taken through glass such as terminal windows),
pictured just a part of an aircraft (with no motivation, like a special
sticker, damage etc., for doing so), out of focus, distracting or
obstructing objects in the foreground or similar (this is especially true
for gate shots which are very difficult to get accepted due to their common
nature and the large amount of ancilliary equipment which usually surrounds
the aircraft) or did not picture an aircraft or anything sufficiently
related to aviation at all. Finally, you might read this because your camera
displays the date in the lower right corner of the image. If so, please
disable that feature in the future.
this phot was rejected some 2 months ago for beeing not leveled with a screener comment: rotate , and reupload !
JoakimE From Sweden, joined Nov 2001, 408 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4144 times:
In my opinion the four orange sticks steal the attention to much for it the be worth the effort of appeal, it was the first thing I saw when opening the picture, and I'm guessing that it was THE reason for the rejection this time...
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4090 times:
okidok, so you guys think the poles are the prob ... , aehm .... , well why not use wietses shot ?
i ll try with a shot taken some secs later without poles .... , we will see whats going to happen .... , but anyway , why didnt the screener wrote: check the poles?
any way, thx vm for your ideas ...... , and help ....