Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Want To Share This Rejection ....  
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4047 times:

ciao guys,

i normally never complain about a rejection, cause i normally understand the reason, even if i see it different ... , where would we end up, if everybody is going to appeal its rejections ..... , but this one is totally different ....

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=OE-IEL.jpg

rejected for:

The following photos were rejected:
(Please read more below)

- OE-IEL.jpg (Tyrolean Jet Services Bombardier BD-700-1A10 Global Express)

The photos were of low esthetic qualities - bad angle, included
window reflections (for shots taken through glass such as terminal windows),
pictured just a part of an aircraft (with no motivation, like a special
sticker, damage etc., for doing so), out of focus, distracting or
obstructing objects in the foreground or similar (this is especially true
for gate shots which are very difficult to get accepted due to their common
nature and the large amount of ancilliary equipment which usually surrounds
the aircraft) or did not picture an aircraft or anything sufficiently
related to aviation at all. Finally, you might read this because your camera
displays the date in the lower right corner of the image. If so, please
disable that feature in the future.

this phot was rejected some 2 months ago for beeing not leveled with a screener comment: rotate , and reupload !

i really cant see low esthetic quality ....

should i appeal?

cheers robin


ABC
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePaulianer From Germany, joined Jul 2002, 875 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4003 times:

Hi Robin,

nice shoot... Maybe its rejected in cause of the four wooden sticks in the grass right in front of the aircraft???

But I think its really worth an appeal... Good luck  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Greetings from Hamburg
Tobi

P.S.: Can't wait for our LHR trip....



Tobias Rose - Hamburg (HAM/EDDH) & (XFW/EDHI) - Canon EOS D60 - ICQ: 235621277 - MSN: Tobias.Rose@gmx.de
User currently offlineJoakimE From Sweden, joined Nov 2001, 408 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3973 times:

In my opinion the four orange sticks steal the attention to much for it the be worth the effort of appeal, it was the first thing I saw when opening the picture, and I'm guessing that it was THE reason for the rejection this time...

User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3944 times:

Well, if the sticks are a problem, just photoshop them out  Big grin

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3928 times:

http://home.planet.nl/~degraaf001/pics/OE-IELlol.jpg

What poles are you talking about?



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3919 times:

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy

okidok, so you guys think the poles are the prob ... , aehm .... , well why not use wietses shot ?  Innocent
i ll try with a shot taken some secs later without poles .... , we will see whats going to happen .... , but anyway , why didnt the screener wrote: check the poles?
any way, thx vm for your ideas ...... , and help ....

cheerio robin



ABC
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3910 times:

It does look a little different without all the distractions....



But, I'm partial to biz jets.....


v/r
Jeff

[Edited 2003-09-04 16:22:08]

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3835 times:

This is what I had in mind....Just a few steps more .....



Jeff

[Edited 2003-09-04 21:57:42]

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3779 times:

Let me try this again...

Original--------


Less the distractions----


There, maybe this one will stay for a while. I like this version better then the original...

Jeff

[Edited 2003-09-05 00:39:51]

User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3697 times:

Hmmmm, cloning out things could be problematic, depending on the screener.

But then again ....  Wink/being sarcastic

It definitely looks better without the poles, but this could have been precised in the rejection mail.

Anway, good luck

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Want To Share A Motive Rejection posted Tue Jul 11 2006 12:04:42 by Rotate
I Just Want To Share This Photo posted Sun Jul 3 2005 18:41:15 by AKau
Got A Rejection, I Want To Share .... posted Thu Oct 9 2003 10:11:05 by Rotate
Would Like To Save This Rejection! posted Tue Feb 7 2006 10:16:23 by Linco22
Just Have To Share This..... posted Sat Jul 2 2005 15:17:05 by StealthZ
Just Want To Mention This Shot posted Fri Jan 2 2004 23:42:10 by Gr325
Unfortunately Rejected, But I Want To Share. posted Mon Apr 28 2003 21:42:01 by Paulianer
I Don't Want To Say This Is A Fake, But... posted Wed Mar 28 2001 03:28:33 by Dazed767
I'd Like To Understand This Motive Rejection posted Thu Apr 6 2006 02:26:17 by Edoca
Rejection - Any Way To Improve This Photo? posted Thu Jan 26 2006 00:44:08 by QantasA332