Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is A Digital Camera Best For Aviation Photography?  
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Posted (14 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 5107 times:

Which is better for aviation photography, a digital camera or a regular camera? Has the Sony Mavica FD-95 come out yet? I'm interested in getting on of those!

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

BA


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3940 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4933 times:

As for myself, I guess I'am a tradationalist....film photography is still the way to go, if you want quality. Digital IMO has still some quality issues to be addressed, but given another 5-10 years or so digital imagery will probably be on the same level as film, perhaps even passing film in quality reproduction.

Then there is the issue of todays current crop of digital cameras. Myself, if I had to choose a digital camera, I would purchase one of the high end (read $$$$$) digital SLRs that are being offered by Nikon, and Canon..e.g. Kodak/Nikon's DCS600 ($6000.00) Nikon D1 (5000.00) Kodak/Canon DCS520($12,000) ect.. the Nikons are usually F-5, or N90 mounted on digital packs, and the Canons are EOS 1ns. As you can see these are not marketed to the average shooter, but to the pro photog, newspapers, and wires. If I had the bucks I would probably purchase one (the Canon model). As for the consumer models, well... myself I'll wait until Canon produces a complete SLR (read interchangable lenses) that are fully the equalivant of the current selection of todays SLRs, but most importantly within the $2000.00 price range.

Sorry for the lengthy reply.

Thomas



"Show me the Braniffs"
User currently offlineN314AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4912 times:

Although Digital photography may be a thing of the future, negatives and
positives provide better grain and overall photo...primarilly when enlargements
are needed. Film also provides much better color tone and sharpness.
Try Kodacrome 64 or 25 slide film or Fuji Velvia, which rates around iso 40-50.
Compare the same shot with a digital camera and you'll see the difference.
If one would like a mega-pixel product out of one, you may have to settle
for the "pro" line such as those like Canon's EOS-1 and Nikon's F-5 or D-1
bodies. They're way too expensive now. Give it some time before digital
can compare to film.
For aviation photography, most will use slides or slow print film (iso 100 or less).
Some of the air to air photographers rely on larger format cameras such as
Mamiyas. But most or all still shoot film.


User currently offlineFastGlass From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 4905 times:

The big drawback to digital aviation photography are the lens choices right now. Even the better (more expensive) cameras have a very limited zoom range, so they are not the hot tip for distant shots.

The best exception to this rule is the Nikon D1, on which you can mount your own Nikkors and shoot "like normal". However, this camera body is in the $5000 range and not suitable for casual shooting at that price.

The other limitation is resolution, if you want to print any of these pictures. The current 2+ and 3+ Megapixel 'consumer' cameras may afford you the ability to print smaller pictures, but they still are choked by the long focal length limitations.

I carry my Olympus C-2020Z dig cam wherever I go for quick shots, but when it comes time to get serious it can't hold a candle to good 35mm slide film with a long lens. Couple that with a hi-end slide scanner and printer, and you'll notice the difference right away...


User currently offlineJasonm From Australia, joined May 2000, 238 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4890 times:

I agree....SLR's are the way to go. This question is answered in the FAQ section of airliners.net and it is said there that digital cameras can't compete with regular SLR's at the moment  

User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4875 times:

As a digital photographer myself, I can agree that NOTHING comapres to a good SLR with a solid lens. My digital frustrates me more than it makes me happy, and I sometimes have to ask my self why I stick with it for aviation photography. Yea, it's great for close-up stuff, but I REALLY have the itch to start doing some action shots (which usally require a good zoom).

BUT - digital is great for everyday stuff. Check out this website to see what people are doing with their digital cameras (non-aviation site):

http://digitalphotocontest.com/photooftheday.asp

So, for me, it's starting to look like this: I will aquire a good 35mm setup for aviation stuff, but the digital will remain for everyday 'snapshots'. I have to admit though...the new Nikon 990 is a KILLER digital camera. If it offered more zoom, I wouln't even be considering a 35mm SLR. The new crop of digicams are getting good, and I can't wait to see next year's products...

-Scott
San Diego, CA


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which NY Airport Is Best For Aviation Photography posted Thu Apr 7 2005 21:10:43 by Columbia107
Is A 320MM Lens Enough For Aviation Photography? posted Sun Jan 21 2001 22:14:22 by BA
Best Scanner For Aviation Photography posted Thu Jul 1 2004 19:33:24 by Aa7E7
Best Classes For Aviation Photography posted Thu Sep 19 2002 01:17:17 by UALrampORD
Best Time Of Year For Aviation Photography? posted Thu Apr 18 2002 17:42:12 by Dripstick
Best Equipment For Aviation Photography? posted Sat Oct 6 2001 16:21:32 by Herbman
Is F/4.5-5.6 Lens Enough For Aviation Photography? posted Tue Jan 23 2001 00:53:16 by BA
Sport Mode For Aviation Photography? posted Sat Dec 4 2004 05:01:29 by Sleekjet
Settings For Aviation Photography posted Fri Sep 3 2004 00:18:02 by JAGflyer
Is A Digital Camera Needed To Upload To A.net? posted Sun Feb 29 2004 09:19:13 by ACB777
Macro Lens For Aviation Photography? posted Thu Jun 25 2009 22:00:03 by DL767captain