Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon Digital Rebel  
User currently offlineCcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2235 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2746 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was looking at some phohos taken by this camera and noticed that in one of my camera catalogs it was $899.99 and wonered if this is a great camera or something like 2000 rebel brand(not talking about film but the specs)?

Here are some that were taken by the camera


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan Kaskel
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan Kaskel




"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2709 times:

It is a toned down version of the 10D and D60. Same sensor, but smaller buffer and lower fps. But if you dont require high performance, its a good camera for you.

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineJiggles From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2699 times:

Please excuse my ignorance......
What does smaller buffer and lower fps mean in simple English?
I am considering buying this camera and am genuinely interested.

Gary


User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

A buffer is basically the memory in which the camera stores images temporarily. So you can shoot more frames in a row with a 10D than with the 300D. fps stands for frames per second. Go here for details & comparisons:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EDR/EDRA1A.HTM


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2648 times:

It is a great camera, but the fps does make a difference as I found out today. The first flight from Munich (LH) came today with a 763 Star Alliance scheme (so did the 744 from Frankfurt, it was amazing). I had to wait for the shots to be written to my damn card and it took a while so if you are the kind of person that needs something close to "automatic" (like 8 fps), the 300D, Digital Rebel isn't going to cut it with its 4.


MIA777
User currently offlineRayPettit From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 608 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2617 times:

I imagine the 300D or Rebel as its known in the USA may show its limitations if you're taking a quick succession of touchdown shots or perhaps some air display type shots. It's in these kind of situations you wish to take multiple shots in quick succession to get the best one, and the 10D is much better in these situations than the 300D. Also, the 10D can cope with faster focusing too - probably not an issue for most of us, but if you intend to use your camera for non-av work where the subject is moving quickly at fairly close quarters, you ought to take note.

For many people here, I'm sure the Rebel/300D/Kiss (dependant on where you live!) will be fine and it is for sure a very good camera, and I hope that it may be for you too. I myself will be going for the 10D as they'll be times when I might need those extras and I take the view that I ought to buy the best camera I can afford. It also has a metal casing rather than a plastic one.

A final piece of advice - even a 300D/Rebel is a major investment and you should understand some of the terminology in order to understand what the camera can do and cannot do for you. I'll never get to grips with all that computerspeak but I always advise people to read the web, as stated elsewhere in this thread, and buy a magazine or two that explains these things in context.

Ray


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2607 times:

Ray pretty much nailed it. You pay for what you get. The Digital Rebel is less expensive for a reason. So if its limitations satisfy your general needs then go for it (like I did, thanks for the free plugs  Smile).

Ryan Kaskel



MIA777
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Good Price For Canon Digital Rebel XT posted Sun Sep 25 2005 22:44:07 by Jetmatt777
Lense For Canon Digital Rebel XT (350D) posted Tue May 31 2005 02:07:47 by LOT767-300ER
Canon Digital Rebel Questions posted Wed Apr 20 2005 03:36:47 by Freedomtofly
Latest: Canon Digital Rebel XT posted Thu Feb 17 2005 05:53:34 by Muchswatch
Canon Digital Rebel? posted Tue Dec 7 2004 01:34:26 by Usairwys757
Canon Digital Rebel Firmware Hack? posted Sun Nov 14 2004 10:19:28 by YEGPIX
Should I Buy A Canon Digital Rebel? posted Tue Oct 5 2004 04:40:52 by Smithfly114
Canon Digital Rebel posted Sat Jul 17 2004 05:12:25 by VSMike
Canon Digital Rebel posted Sun Oct 26 2003 20:13:20 by CcrlR
Canon 300D (Digital Rebel) Available In Black posted Sun Nov 7 2004 15:59:29 by JAGflyer