Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"Reconditioned Cameras"  
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2054 posts, RR: 20
Posted (12 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2739 times:

As we all know, there are "reconditioned" cameras out there that can be had for significant savings over their usual price. Have any of you bought one and if so, are you happy with the experience?

II Cor. 4:17-18
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

I have not purchased a reconditioned camera, but have purchased other items that were "factory refurbished." I have been happy with those things and did save some money.

I would ONLY buy one of these from a reputable dealer and have a warranty in hand. Most will offer the original factory warranty or something similar.

As with everything...buyer beware. What you save in purchase cost may cost you in headaches down the line if you are not careful.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"Double" Rejection posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:47:14 by Ander
Rjxn For "Editing": Can Someone Please Explain? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 18:56:06 by D L X
Will It Get The Dreaded "Motive" Rejection? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 07:43:59 by Cosec59
The "New" Professional Photographers posted Tue Oct 17 2006 18:37:30 by N314AS
Nose To "hot"? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 12:57:14 by Pavvyben
Accident Pic Rejected For "personal" posted Wed Sep 20 2006 23:44:05 by EZYAirbus
A "level" Rejection posted Thu Sep 14 2006 20:24:38 by Cosec59
Another "motiv" Rejection... posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:56:26 by Walter2222
Another "Motiv" Question posted Wed Aug 30 2006 01:00:49 by Eadster
First "soft", Then "motiv" posted Tue Aug 29 2006 22:01:38 by Walter2222