Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Getting Tired Of "bad Motiv"  
User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 45
Posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3605 times:

Had another one............

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=LH744_FRA_DABTD_engine_30Oct2003.jpg

So from now on, only 50mm side on ramp shots with no clutter!

Vasco

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3569 times:

Vasco,

Personally, I love these kinds of shots. But Johan has made it known that he does not, and we have to apply his rules.

Charles


User currently offlineBromma1968 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3529 times:

Vasco, I too love these kind of shots. Send your great shots to some of the other smaller
plane picture sites. Keep up your good work!

Anders


User currently offlineJasonwinn From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3522 times:

Wow Personally I love that shot! I really don't understand how that is bad motiv. Its a nice aspect ratio of engine to human.
oh well.


User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5067 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3510 times:

count me in too. i like the shot!


bruce



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineAtco From Canada, joined Jul 2001, 277 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3509 times:

A well executed and interesting shot that I know for sure will be welcomed elsewhere Big grin


AirTeamImages
User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3500 times:

Shame that... lovely shot Vasco!

Yup, like Gary and others have said, there are alternatives that would accept that shot!

Cheers!

Rez
 Big thumbs up



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineRyangooner From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 969 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

nice shot

I like that pic too......

There are pics on this site showing only undercarriage......?

so why cant you have pics detailing interesting engine shots..?

beats me!

Ryan



ooh to ooh to be ooh to be a gooner!
User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3391 times:

Wonderful shot. Definitely tells something. Did the rules change? Or what exact rule does deny the acceptance of this picture? I ask, because there are several pics showing open engines.

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 45
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3384 times:

Charles wrote:

"Personally, I love these kinds of shots. But Johan has made it known that he does not, and we have to apply his rules"

No bashing of other photographers work and I do not want to stirr up trouble. Not my intention at all, but wouldn't it be nice if the same standards and views are applied for let's say most of the shots......


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © TTT




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brad Harris




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brett B. Despain




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Daniel & Robert Fall




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Krzysztof Skowronski [epwa_spotters]



I love all those shots, but based on terms and conditions of airliners.net they are not welcome on this site.....

Please, don't turn this thread into a bashing session or similar....I just want to get an explanation.

On another note....even though it is Johan's site and he set the rules....the website lives and dies by the people visiting....

Shouldn't those opinions be considered as well?

One word MARKETING.

A simple rule, if you don't listen to your customers, they will go elsewhere and do business there.

What I have learned over the years in my professional life is that employees sometimes have pretty good ideas how to improve certain things to make a business more profitable. Convincing the owner is always tough to do, but heck if it works and you have the right point, why not accept it and change it?

Vasco Garcia






User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3371 times:

Vasco.

E-mail me. (In profile.)

William


User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3366 times:

Vasco...take a look at this thread..
http://airliners.net/discussions/aviation_photography/read.main/109546/

Tony


User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3337 times:

Vasco,
E-mail me directly: exit_row@hotmail.com

For some reason, I can't "reply" to the e-mail you sent through A.net's web mail. Maybe it's because you're "Second Class."

William


User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 45
Reply 13, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3336 times:

What you are calling me second class, I give you second class..................................just kidding.

E-mail is on it's way.

Vasco


User currently offlineAPP From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3236 times:

Not that my opinion counts for diddlysquat but I think the photo had 'greatmotiv'
APP.


User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3212 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm having a similar situation right now with interior details (like seats, lower deck etc. on the 346) and also some airport architecture shot. But I've learned to accept it and move on. Even though I think it's not right...

K.



Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3207 times:

http://airliners.net/discussions/aviation_photography/read.main/109546/








...what did I say....?



 Wink/being sarcastic



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Getting Rid Of "yellowishness" Of D70 Pics posted Wed Apr 20 2005 10:11:27 by Kay
Am I Getting Tired Of LHR Spotting? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 20:10:18 by SmithAir747
Another Case Of "bad Info" posted Mon Mar 14 2005 10:50:05 by Aviopic
Southwest N363SW "Heroes Of The Heart" posted Wed Aug 30 2006 20:09:28 by Jakbar
What Is The Meaning Of "motive" Rejection? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 09:35:44 by Walter2222
Addition Of "the" Watermark On Your Photo's. posted Fri Aug 19 2005 13:18:26 by DutchOps
Another Round Of "!#$% Baddark?" posted Thu Jun 16 2005 23:15:06 by UA777222
Another Round Of "Is This Worthy?" posted Mon Apr 11 2005 22:56:05 by WakeTurbulence
Other Opinions On My "Bad Motiv" posted Tue Feb 15 2005 01:01:34 by Atomother
Bad Motiv Rejections Getting Ridicules posted Sun Nov 16 2003 19:47:16 by Paulinbna