AKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3534 times:
"Personally, I love these kinds of shots. But Johan has made it known that he does not, and we have to apply his rules"
No bashing of other photographers work and I do not want to stirr up trouble. Not my intention at all, but wouldn't it be nice if the same standards and views are applied for let's say most of the shots......
I love all those shots, but based on terms and conditions of airliners.net they are not welcome on this site.....
Please, don't turn this thread into a bashing session or similar....I just want to get an explanation.
On another note....even though it is Johan's site and he set the rules....the website lives and dies by the people visiting....
Shouldn't those opinions be considered as well?
One word MARKETING.
A simple rule, if you don't listen to your customers, they will go elsewhere and do business there.
What I have learned over the years in my professional life is that employees sometimes have pretty good ideas how to improve certain things to make a business more profitable. Convincing the owner is always tough to do, but heck if it works and you have the right point, why not accept it and change it?
Fly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3171 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3362 times:
I'm having a similar situation right now with interior details (like seats, lower deck etc. on the 346) and also some airport architecture shot. But I've learned to accept it and move on. Even though I think it's not right...
Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...