Cancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 12 Posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2022 times:
can someone please tell me what is wrong with this picture?? i used no digital zoom to get it and the camera is 3.2 megapixels. i have appealed this picture twice already and continue to see nothing wrong with it.
Danny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3498 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1960 times:
I would say badscan because of the noise on the sky. On the other side the fuelsage is still soft. Glare on the fuelsage is natural so I don't think that's the problem as well as registration not being visible.
Consider asking Santa for a new camera
Slamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 69
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1902 times:
It is a nice shot but I'd have to agree with "badscan" as defined here. The number IS visible. It is on the nosegear door. Just add "N" and "UW" With my F707 if I have a frame-filling shot like this the number on the gear door would be perfectly legible without any sharpening.
There is no photo problem that can't be exchanged for a better problem by buying more expensive gear.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.