BadScan Help — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

BadScan Help

Bruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5027 posts, RR: 17
Posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 939 times:

Anybody want to venture a guess as to what makes this a badscan? I can't figure it out. True, it is a large size and i could have down-sized it but would that really help? Is it the color of the sky? All of the letters and numbers are clear.

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=N514MJ_8144.jpg

bruce

Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens

7 replies: All unread, jump to last

JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 920 times:

no guess from me... Nice shot Bruce.

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 921 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Why upload the larger size?

Tim

Alderman Exit

Bruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5027 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 912 times:

Well, I choose my upload size for an image depending on my assessment of the overall quality of it..... my normal is 1200x800 and the highest I ever do is 1500x1000 which i save for the ultra-sharp or otherwise stand-out photos of which this one appeared to be.... but i seem to be missing something that the screener saw I guess. Its not a major thing, if a smaller version would have made it look "better" I would have gone for that.

I did upload a different version..the shot taken right after this one in sequence, and made that one smaller. But my favorite was this one...........

bruce

Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens

Lugonza_2001 From Spain, joined Oct 2001, 315 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 901 times:

I haven´t seen anything wrong on this either. I wish my scans were that good.

Sad

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 900 times:

On my monitor it doesn't look tacksharp, particularly the rear.
Uploading a lower resolution would make it look better I think.
Otherwise a nice shot!

Cheers
Tim

Alderman Exit

Kereru From New Zealand, joined Jun 2003, 873 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 874 times:

Bruce,

I agreed with another screener that it was bad scan and soft although marginal and rejected your photo. Look around the nosewheel and overall it is a little soft too. I think your comment about it being sharp in the remark led me to reject it because it was soft.

You can always appeal, but I think if you sharpen it a bit more and reupload from the original it should be okay?

Regards,

Colin

Good things take Time.

Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9462 posts, RR: 72
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 857 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

it is soft from motion blur, then oversharpened.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: