Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
If I Were A Terrorist.........  
User currently offlineRyanAMS From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 29 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

I would not use the viewing platform at LHR!!

The reason I say this is because I still can`t believe that BAA and H.M Govt are still using terrorism as an excuse for keeping it closed.

Lets look at the facts.

The viewing platform is isolated from the rest of the airport, so unless I`m James Bond and wish to absale down onto the lower roofs without being seen from inside Terminal 2 the only way a terrorist could attack a plane would be with a rocket/grenade launcher.

First problem. The only entrance is the small fire escape doors. To get to this I would have to either pass the entrance of terminal 2 and/or the bus station and Queens building. You usually have a group of BA pilots and stewardess waiting here plus an array of airport staff. So carrying rocket/grenade launcher would be quite noticeable.

Ok if I did manage to get onto the viewing platform it is very rare for NO ONE else to be there. Again I think a fellow spectator would notice a rocket/grenade launcher (unless he thought it was a new ultrazoom camera).

If the worst case scenario happened and I did fire a rocket/grenade launcher then I would have to make it across the roof,down the stairs before the police and/or special force are waiting for him at the door, and if after all this I did make it out the only exit from the airport grounds are through the tunnel and/or London Underground, and both of these would be closed off the very second an attack happened.

However I could just visit the viewing park in Manchester which is adjacent to the runway and launch an attack from there and speed away in an awaiting car and escape via the M56.

So lets hope that eventually BAA and H.M Govt see sense and re-open LHR viewing platform ASAP.

Remember by closing locations and by altering our everyday life we are letting the terrorists win !!!!.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

Remember, by closing locations, they have simplified their job (for the moment)of securing the airport, thus preventing the terrorists from "winning" as you call it, at that location. Opening the platform does nothing to increase the level of security.

User currently offlineIwantaBBJ From Switzerland, joined Jun 2002, 782 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1666 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Isn't the need to make that site accessible for the handicapped also a reason why they keep that place shut...??? At least I heard something like that quite a few times....


User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 15339 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1584 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


Unfortunately, you're preaching to the converted here!  Sad

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

Topic: If I Were A Terrorist.........

Once you have managed to commit your evil act from the terrace, why would you want to getaway?
Aren't you wearing a semtex loaded belt?
That could blow away many a.net photographers within a 100 yard radius.

 Acting devilish

User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I think this topic does not make any sense.
Remember, the terrosrists themselves might read this forum, so lets not make it easy for them.
It's also because of them at some airports photography is harder / considered hazardous to the security and terraces are closed.

Keep that in mind.

How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineRsmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1508 times:


>>>>Remember, the terrosrists themselves might read this forum, so lets not make it easy for them.<<<<<

I think they probably know better places to shoot from then we do to be honest...why maybe they have a Arabplanespotters.net site.......We have to stop treating these terroist like they are a bunch of uniformed JackA$&es. They are probably better educated than most of us here in the USA.....

Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
User currently offlineAviatortj From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Any terrorist in their right mind would take advantage of the 5 mi. distance on their SAMs. Considering most airports don't have patrols far beyond the perimeters would they not want to go to a remote location. I think they would want to use a viewing terrace and say that it was a 'photographer' who did it. But what do I know? Write a letter.


User currently offlineMIAMIx707 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1444 times:

you should email this to the authorities at FLL or MCO, just don't include the "If I were a terrorist.." part lol

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If Canon And Nikon Were Compatible? posted Tue Apr 4 2006 22:59:17 by 9VSPO
Got Asked If I Was Cloning By Screener posted Sun Nov 26 2006 04:07:09 by Eksath
Does Anyone Know Were This Dam Is? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 04:03:16 by Rev3oh2
How Would It Work If... posted Sat Nov 11 2006 01:25:03 by Daleaholic
A Quick Note If You Are Thinking About Appealing posted Thu Aug 17 2006 15:28:45 by Clickhappy
While The Screeners Were Busy posted Sun Jul 30 2006 01:01:44 by DLKAPA
Need Help If Interested posted Wed Jun 14 2006 01:37:10 by Echster
Can A Screener Please Check If I Ticked Wrong Box? posted Sat Jun 10 2006 21:01:44 by Manc
My First Photo's Were Rejected.... Help! posted Mon Jun 5 2006 11:04:55 by EGTESkyGod
Will You Accept If This Is Bad Quality And Color? posted Fri Apr 28 2006 14:43:41 by VasanthD