Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Motion Blur Question  
User currently offlineJust_Plane_Mad From New Zealand, joined Mar 2002, 22 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Hi guys just not long bought me a Canon Eos 300D DSLR was wondering and am interested in motion blur and how to get good motion blur at that , is anyone able to assist me with some tips at all ?

thanks in advance,
Will Mallinson

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineUTA_FLYingHIGH From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2339 times:

Just shake the camera a little Big grin

UTA



Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2334 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf



Like these? Just set the shutter to somewhere near 1/25th of a second and follow the subject with a nice smooth pan. Should come out nice with a bit of practice. For best results do this at dawn/dusk. That gives the best images.

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2334 times:

As I don't have to humor of William  Nuts I think I shall answer a little differently.

Basically when panning an aircraft for example coming into land, set the camera to Tv mode and lower the shutter speed to as low as you think you can physically coupe with and still get a good image.

Then pan the aircraft well, hold the camera very steady, remembering to contunie to pan after the shot for a bit to make sure you dont mees the shot up and then view the resuls on your LCD.

Its a little trial and error to start with but its not too hard once you get better at it.

Ben Pritchard


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 765 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

As above, but just to emphasise that the secret is a smooth motion before, during and after shutter release. Most people seem to instinctively freeze the camera when they press the shutter, or jerk the camera up/down a little. If you've ever played golf, its a little similar - you need to pan through the shutter release like you're supposed to swing through the golf ball.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2320 times:


View Large View Medium

Photo © Eduard Brantjes
View Large View Medium

Photo © Eduard Brantjes



Make sure the plane it not coming at you as the angle of the plane changes while the shutter is open. The nose or tail will go blurry, as they have a different relative speed towards the camera. Side-on works the best, as the angle of the plane hardly changes during the shot. Keep the motion fluent as Colin said and use a slow shutterspeed (<1/125th).

[Edited 2004-01-15 15:33:16]

[Edited 2004-01-15 15:47:43]

User currently offlineRotor1 From Tajikistan, joined Mar 2003, 230 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2206 times:

They all make it sound so easy... and therein forget the most important step...

Set camera to drive mode. Hold down the shutter button and take lots and lots and lots and lots of pictures. If you take at least 1,000 photos, you should have 1-2 good ones  Big grin

I've found good pan-action hovers around 1/125 to 1/80th. Leave the lens as wide (backed out) as you can and still get the shot, which helps decrease blur from camera shake.

The best I've done has been 1/80th at about 400mm... it was a miracle the shot came out as well as it did:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike "Rotor" Nowak



My goal is to eventually get a 1/4sec shot with the a/c perfectly sharp. One day...

Mike



The best aviation photo I've ever taken was rejected by Airliners.net
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 765 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2194 times:

Hold down the shutter button and take lots and lots and lots and lots of pictures

Something I've never done - an article I read a long time ago prejudiced me (probably irrationally  Smile) against motor drives. It put forward the arguement that even if you shot 10 frames/sec at, say, 1/100th, you still only have a 1 in 10 chance of catching the critical moment. For example, on an aircraft landing, relying on continous drive makes capturing the exact moment those tires touch the tarmac pretty remote.

Of course most aircraft shots are not quite so time critical, and Mike's advice makes perfect sense - I sometimes wonder after the fact why I didn't keep my finger on the shutter. Old habits die hard.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineAirportugal From Portugal, joined Nov 1999, 139 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

This is my first successful attempt at doing some motion blur shots.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Luis Gonçalves



I set the speed to 1/80th and held the camera as steady as possible. I had to shoot 6 frames before getting a decent shot. And yes, the camera used was the EOS300D.

Luis G


User currently offlineJust_Plane_Mad From New Zealand, joined Mar 2002, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

WOW ! thanks so much guys ! i'll b sure to give it a go and keep on practicing  Smile
Will Mallinson


User currently offlineKempa From Brazil, joined Aug 2003, 373 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

Do not use the camera LCD display. Use the eye viewer, and follow the plane with your head and your body. Keep the camera on drive and the button pressed. Do not use autofocus or any other automatic function, manually set the focus to the distance you want to shoot. You don't want your camera to delay your shots because it is metering the shots before the shutter starts operating.

User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 765 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2134 times:

Kempa, you've probably managed to highlight in a single paragraph the key differences between shooting with a DSLR and a digicam.

In the case of the 300D as used by Will (and other DSLRs), you don't have the option of using an LCD to compose and shoot - the point of the SLR design being to look through the lens itself via the viewfinder. As far as metering goes, this is performed continously and instantaneously right up to the moment the shutter opens (unless of course you choose to lock the exposure) - this can be a real plus in continuous shooting, particularly with intermittent sun.

Again with AF - as far as I know, all DSLRs have a servo mode which allows moving objects to be continuously tracked by the AF system right up to the point of the shutter opening.

Certainly your comments are useful and valid for digicams - but do perhaps illustrate what DSLR users are paying for  Smile

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 17
Reply 12, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

I have had some success with it, and love to do it. I'm a fan of the hold down and prey method.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark McWhirter




Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

Something I've never done - an article I read a long time ago prejudiced me (probably irrationally ) against motor drives. It put forward the arguement that even if you shot 10 frames/sec at, say, 1/100th, you still only have a 1 in 10 chance of catching the critical moment. For example, on an aircraft landing, relying on continous drive makes capturing the exact moment those tires touch the tarmac pretty remote.

Funny you mention that. I read the same thing in a book yesterday and it basically said that many times the real action you want capture is in between each exposure and its better to stay away from continious mode. (I know that's exactly what you are saying). However wouldn't "pressing" cause slight camera shake which would potentially ruin the photo?



MIA777
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 48
Reply 14, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2065 times:

However wouldn't "pressing" cause slight camera shake which would potentially ruin the photo?

===================================================

Moving your finger 0.5mm won't create very much shaking. Not more shaking than from an SLR mirror going up and down like crazy when keeping it pressed during the shoot...

[Edited 2004-01-16 21:08:37]

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 15, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

I dont think he means the actual click, more the force your finger has on the shutter. When pushing it, you slightly tilt the body, so either be very carefull with your shutter, or fire a sequence to prevent this from happening.

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 48
Reply 16, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2048 times:

Ok... I see. I haven't experienced that though. The shutter requires very little force and moving only the last 2 joints of the index finger... But, true, it is a point of attention with panning shots: Keep cool and click gently.  Smile

[Edited 2004-01-16 21:43:48]

User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

SHAMELESS PLUG ALERT!  Big thumbs up

I messed with the aperture for this shot. I cannot remember the settings right off, it was taken with my Minolta 700SI with Fuji Sensia film scanned with the Dimage Dual Scan II. I am going to work on a better scan, I have new software.. Anyways, just experiment.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chad Thomas



User currently offlineBoieng747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2009 times:

Hey,

Haven't tried many yet, mainly cuz I like to nail a plane properly.

Here's one picture I have up:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Timothy Feise



Technical details: f/7.1, 1/40s, 189mm, iso 100

Cheers,
Tim


User currently offlinePW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2557 posts, RR: 13
Reply 19, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2005 times:

Have tried some myself, with mixed results. Not yet up to par with A.net standards.

How about these for motion blur . . . . . did they forget to close the shutter???


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © YOSHIAKI HOSHINA
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Matsushita Masashi - aozora karugamotai -



Harm



Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 20, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1972 times:

Just 2 of my successful attempts:

View Large View Medium

Photo © Peter Unmuth - VAP
View Large View Medium

Photo © Peter Unmuth - VAP


And one of the ones with a very low shutter speed. 1/40 and the camera on a monopod. this was the sharpest one out of three shots. It was number 2.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth - VAP


Peter

[Edited 2004-01-17 10:37:36]

[Edited 2004-01-17 10:37:57]


-
User currently offlineMarco_polo From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 324 posts, RR: 17
Reply 21, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Will:

Clovis and Paul Paulsen from LAX they both seems to be pro at motion blur images. Here are some of their sample works. You might want to shoot e-mail over their way just to get some detail from them. I believe they use TV mode (Shutter Piority Mode) and setting it between 1/60th to 1/125th of sec. Aperature setting are automatically calculate and set by the camera.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Reve
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Reve




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Reve
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Paulsen




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Paulsen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Paulsen



Cheers - Jay


User currently offlineJust_Plane_Mad From New Zealand, joined Mar 2002, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1911 times:

Thankyou guys SO much for all your help with my question , i gues i'll b referring to your suggestions quite a lot while i learn !

once again thankyou very much , much aprecciated !

Will Mallinson  Smile


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5576 posts, RR: 63
Reply 23, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1895 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt


I got the above image by accident  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers

Gary Watt


User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1869 times:




Click for bigger version


A 3,000 lbs. Gitzo tripod helps a great deal too...  Big thumbs up

William


25 Post contains images Paulinbna : In my experience with this like some else said before the best seem to come out better when you shoot from the side of the aircraft. Like this: The se
26 Post contains links and images Andyhunt : Sorry, had to plug this one View Large View MediumPhoto © Andrew Hunt Was over the moon when I processed it.......! Andrew
27 Post contains links and images Boieng747-400 : Andy, Great picture! Forgot about this one: View Large View MediumPhoto © Timothy Feise Cheers, Tim
28 Post contains links and images Aviatortj : This is one of my first attempts at motion blur. Beware of shameless plugging ahead: View Large View MediumPhoto © TJ OKeefe I found it was easie
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motion Blur Tips posted Tue Dec 6 2005 21:48:47 by Javibi
New Game, Let's All Find The Motion Blur! posted Sat Jan 15 2005 20:33:05 by DLKAPA
Motion Blur Question posted Thu Jan 15 2004 14:32:55 by Just_Plane_Mad
[Digital] Photography Question - Reduce Blur posted Fri Jan 14 2005 20:09:05 by Alitalia777
LHR Runway Usage Question posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:51:59 by EMA747
Canon 30D - Early Problems Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 16:53:40 by Sabena 690
Compact Flash Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 09:24:13 by FXfan
Motive Question... posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:55:16 by Eadster
Manchester Southside Question posted Wed Dec 6 2006 20:50:50 by Donder10
Rejection/Motiv Question posted Tue Dec 5 2006 23:56:10 by Vzlet