Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Once Again, Lens Advice For Digital Rebel  
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3897 times:

I will be buying a larger lens February or March. I have the 18-55mm that came with my Digital Rebel, and I have bought a Canon 70-200mm f/4L (Seperately).

I am pretty much set on the Sigma 170-500mm $629.00


I have also considered the Canon 50-500mm $750.00- $939.00, but, I would only use it for the 200+ range. Is this a better lens than the 170-500mm?


I have been thinking of getting a 1.4x or 2.0x tele converter for my new Sigma, would the tele converter lower the quality of my photos?

Will I have to get either of these lenses re-chipped?

I would appreciate any opinions. If there are any others out there, I am open to suggestions.

Chad




[Edited 2004-01-19 09:09:47]

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3841 times:

You will lose autofocus on both lenses. I believe you are limited to using only the Sigma EX tc's as well.

User currently offlineWannabe From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 677 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3817 times:

Maiznblu_757 ,
You may want to go to the following website. It's a great site for learning more about digital photography, and they have reviews of various lenses. It's a bit high-brow in that there are a number of professionals who take part in it, but you always get good advice. I would research hard before I would buy. Don't let money in your pocket burn a hole. If you can save a little longer, the better glass is worth the bucks.


http://www.fredmiranda.com/


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

If you are only going to use it for the 200+ range, why buy the 50-500? Many guys on the site use the 175-500 (I think Gary Watt is among them) and the results are great.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt



Ryan Kaskel - MIA



MIA777
User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3769 times:

Great post I am wondering this for myself as well.

So umm with the 50-500 being newer, how does it actually compare to the 170-500? what are the main differences? I'd think that quality might be better on 170-500 compared to 50-500 when you have a zoom ratio of 10x.



User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5054 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3768 times:

huh. After seeing some of Paul robbins' photos from BNA (on the other site, soon to be on here) with his new 100-400L IS I am going to save my money and eventually buy that one. I know the Sigma would be cheaper to get into but the canon picture quality is simply unbelieveable.

bruce



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3730 times:

Well, I have been told the 170-500mm Sigma lens is great. That is the one I am leaning towards, but, I want to get some last opinions before I buy it. I also want to try to find a newer one, that wont have to be re-chipped.

User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3721 times:


Maybe Gary could answer this... Why does the photo look so dark?
This was taken with your Sigma 170-500mm.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt



User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3706 times:

I'm not Gary, but the shot looks fine to me... and I too am looking forward to receiving my new Sigma 170-500.

I wonder... is it only the 50-500 that qualifies as a 'BIGMA' or this one too?  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers!

Rez
(who would liked to have gotten a Canon L lens but simply can't wait that long!)
 Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3630 times:

Why does the photo look so dark?

Maybe it was cloudy out?



MIA777
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3619 times:

It's not dark, it just hasn't got any sunlight on it, the sun seems to be shining down the other side of the aircraft.

Nice shot btw!

Staffan


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3611 times:

Yes, it is a great shot.. Just wondering why it looked kind of hazy/dark..

Thanks.

Chad


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3593 times:

Regarding the haze....if you are really zooming in like 400+mm, it is almost inevitable especially here in sunny, humid Miami. It really sucks.


MIA777
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Quick Question For Digital Rebel Owners posted Wed Nov 3 2004 22:02:02 by PNEPilot
2x Extender Or 50-500mm For Digital Rebel? posted Sun Jul 18 2004 18:11:54 by Mx330
Best Spotting Settings For A EOS Digital Rebel posted Sun Sep 17 2006 23:50:11 by Airlinelover
A Good Price For Canon Digital Rebel XT posted Sun Sep 25 2005 22:44:07 by Jetmatt777
Lense For Canon Digital Rebel XT (350D) posted Tue May 31 2005 02:07:47 by LOT767-300ER
Sigma Lens Problems W/Digital Rebel posted Sat Dec 6 2003 11:14:57 by Maiznblu_757
Digital Rebel For $230? posted Thu Nov 27 2003 15:01:35 by Sleekjet
Once Again, They Wanted My Pics For Free... posted Thu Sep 18 2003 12:58:13 by 707cmf
Upgrading Advice For A Kodak DC-280 Digital Camera posted Wed Aug 1 2001 09:45:56 by Strickerje
Seeking Recommendations For Digital Camcorder posted Tue Nov 14 2006 17:57:59 by Jakbar