Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon D100 Or Canon 300D Or 10D?  
User currently offlineGordonsmall From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2001, 2121 posts, RR: 21
Posted (10 years 8 months 11 hours ago) and read 4991 times:

Hi Guys,

I've been looking into getting a Digital SLR for a while now, as my film based kit (A Dynax 500Si) is getting very long in the tooth, and although it was a good step up from my old Praktica BMS and has served me well since I got it, it's just doesn't cut it when it comes to quality anymore. Also my lenses are getting a bit shabby, and the autofocus motors on some of them sound as though they are on their way out, and I see no point in investing any more money in this kit considering it's age.

I quite like the look of the Nikon D100 and the Canon EOS-10D, both are in the price range I'm willing to pay and seem to have a good feature range. Also, the 300D/Rebel seems to offer some good features at a great price.

Could anyone offer any practical advice on these cameras, as well as good lenses covering 28-500mm (doesn't have to be single lens obviously) for the above cameras??

Are there any other cameras I should be looking at in the price range of the D100/10D (maybe a little more)?

My photography is fairly wide ranging, but very amateur. Although I don't upload any of my shots to websites I do the usual airliner stuff from the perimeter fence, and since I started I started working on my PPL I've started taking some shots while waiting at the holding point, as well as some inflight shots both inside the aircraft and of the scenery below. I also do a lot of motorsports stuff as well as the usual pics at family events.

Any help much appreciated.

Regards,
Gordon.


Statistically, people who have had the most birthdays tend to live the longest.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 740 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 10 hours ago) and read 4964 times:

Any of the cameras you mention will serve you well. The 300D probably is best value for money, but, if you want to take photography more seriously, the 10D or D100 will give you more scope for experimention.

You might also want to look at the Sigma S10 and the Olympus E1 - the compact size of the latter may be a consideration if you want to take your camera flying.

My one piece of advice would be to hold off for another month if possible. The major camera event (PMA) takes place at the end of February, and we can expect new models from Canon & Nikon to be announced. This could a) give you new options and b) affect the price of current models.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 10 hours ago) and read 4955 times:

I'd go with the 300D because that leaves more money for lenses.

The 10D and 300D are just about the same except for a few features here and there.

The sigma 50-500 is a pretty good choice, and if I had the money (yeah, right) I'd get myself a nice 300D/Sigma 50-500 combo.

Dreaming of the day I'll have some cash...

Vitaly



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineJoe pries From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1957 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 10 hours ago) and read 4957 times:

If you want to hold out for a 10D, when its replacement comes in february (assuming it will), i'll be selling mine- it is still relatively new.

Joe
ATR Team


User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 7 hours ago) and read 4916 times:

Joe - Do you have any information on the new replacement for the 10D??

Anything appreciated.

Vitaly



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 4914 times:

I am super satisfied with the 300D. I took everyones advice and spent more money on the lenses. Great advice. I will eventually upgrade, but, this camera is superb, and I have no desire to get a new camera in the short term.

Chad Thomas



[Edited 2004-01-25 06:18:12]

User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 740 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 3 hours ago) and read 4889 times:

There is nothing definite on a replacement for the 10D ... or even if it will be replaced. But the various pundits are speculating the Canon will announce a higher spec camera at PMA - something along the lines of the EOS 3 in DSLR form - to fill the gap between the 10D and the 1Ds.

Keep an eye on for news when it is available, but take all non-Canon announcements with a pinch of salt!

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 1 hour ago) and read 4869 times:

D100 is an excellent choice for Minolta users.

The controls on Nikon cameras are far more like Minolta than those on Canon cameras so you'll feel right at home.

For quality there is no difference between Canon and Nikon (or none to speak of, Nikon has better light meters, Canon slightly faster AF unless you get into expensive AF-S or USM lenses).

Replacement for the 10D and 300D both are likely to be announced next month, replacement for the D100 in autumn 2004.
But does that really matter? Unless you always want the very latest model you'll be using an outdated model anyway in a year at most.
Next month Nikon will also announce their competitor to the 300D (or whatever replaces it), the D70. Based on the F75 body, it looks to be a somewhat smaller model with many of the manual options removed (like the 300D) and replaced with program modes.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 740 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4842 times:

But does that really matter?

Probably not - except you might find some significant price movements! Probably worth waiting a few weeks.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nikon D100 Or D70 posted Fri Dec 10 2004 19:54:58 by JumboJim747
Nikon D100 Vs. Canon 10D - Once And For All posted Fri Jul 25 2003 20:43:40 by BigPhilNYC
Poll: Nikon D100 Or Canon D60 posted Mon Sep 30 2002 12:02:17 by UngoMongo
Canon D60 Or Nikon D100, Which One? posted Thu Apr 11 2002 17:26:38 by AKE0404AR
Nikon D70 Or Canon Rebel For X-mas posted Mon Nov 21 2005 01:47:17 by Devil505x
Canon 300D Or Nikon D70? posted Fri Nov 5 2004 12:25:31 by LifelinerOne
Nikon D70 Or Canon EOS Digital Rebel posted Mon Oct 18 2004 05:04:00 by AA777
Canon 300D Or Nikon D70 posted Tue Apr 27 2004 05:03:44 by Wannabe
Canon 100-400 Or 300 L Or 400 L? posted Sat May 13 2006 00:37:44 by LHRSIMON
Canon 300D...or What's Better For The Price? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 11:38:25 by Andz
Canon D60 Or Nikon D100, Which One? posted Thu Apr 11 2002 17:26:38 by AKE0404AR
Canon Or NIKON. posted Fri Apr 24 2009 22:44:15 by GF777
Nikon D70 Or Canon 400d posted Tue Feb 6 2007 21:32:29 by Silverfox
Sony Alpha, Nikon D80, Or The Canon 30D? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 07:52:33 by Kaitak744
Nikon D70 Or Canon Rebel For X-mas posted Mon Nov 21 2005 01:47:17 by Devil505x
Canon 300D Or Nikon D70? posted Fri Nov 5 2004 12:25:31 by LifelinerOne
Nikon D70 Or Canon EOS Digital Rebel posted Mon Oct 18 2004 05:04:00 by AA777