Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon Ef70-200 F4 L  
User currently offlineGharv From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 11 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 10 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3373 times:

Hi, considering buying this lens, with also the plan of getting an ef 1.4 extender.
I appreciate that this has been talked about before on this site, but just looking for upto date/fresh reviews on this lens to make up my mind.
Its a nice L lens (which i want) and coupled with the extender fits into my budget.
Not planning to use a tripod and understand its light enough to carry around.
Could someone give me an idea if a different range is avail when also coupled to the 300d (with and without extender)which i also plan to get.
anything out their would be grateful.
Thks




27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 3 days ago) and read 3331 times:

All of my 300D shots uploaded to this site, have been taken with this lens. I love it. This lens has very high ratings, even higher than the f2.8 IS version. It is very well built (L). I highly recommend the lens. I know the AF is still functional with the 1.4x converter.

http://www.photographyreview.com/PRD_84503_3128crx.aspx#reviews

35mm Zoom
Canon
EF 70-200mm f4L USM
92 Reviews,
4.91 of 5 Rating

35mm Zoom
Canon
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
34 Reviews,
4.68 of 5 Rating





User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 3 days ago) and read 3321 times:

All,
I just found this particular review for this lens. this person says... "On a 10D, Digital Rebel, D30 or D60, this lens operates as a 110-320 telephoto, plenty enough for most sports.

What does he mean by this lens operates as a 110-320 telephoto on the 10D,300D,D30 or D60? The lens is a 70-200mm... Thats why I am not getting the 110-320.. Can someone explain?


Reviewed by: jazzcaster, Expert

Price Paid: $650 at B&H Photo

Photography Experience:
11-20 years, Sports

Summary:
I used this lens to photograph triathlons and soccer. I have never used a zoom lens that produces sharper images. I have replaced this lens with a Canon EF 70-200 2.8L IS USM and the image quality is pretty much the same. If are looking for a zoom in this telephoto range, and don't need a 2.8 aperture, then look no further. This lens is significantly lighter than its 2.8 big brother. Focusing is so fast and silent that if your camera doesn't confirm the focus with a beep, it will sometimes seem that the lens didn't do anything while the image on your view finder came into focus. On a 10D, Digital Rebel, D30 or D60, this lens operates as a 110-320 telephoto, plenty enough for most sports.

Strengths:
Image quality, size, low weight compared to Canon's 2.8 version of the same lens.

Weaknesses:
Lack of tripod collar, especially when used with digital cameras with 1.6 multiplication factor. If you use the tripod collar with an Elan 7E, D60 or 10D with an attached battery pack, it won't fit on some quick release tripod mounts unless you mount it backwards.

Similar Products Used:
Canon EF 70-200 2.8L IS USM
Tamron 100-400 5.6
Sigma 135-400 4.5-5.6 Aspherical APO

Customer Service:
Never used for this lens, but had good experience getting repairs to a G2 and 550EX that I dropped.



User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 765 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 3 days ago) and read 3308 times:

Crop factor. What he means is that when used with a Canon DSLR sensor which crops the image created by the lens by 1.6x, the 70-200 will provide the same angle of view as a 110-320mm on a 35mm film SLR. The resulting image is excatly the same as if you took a normal 35mm shot and cropped the central portion in Photoshop.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3298 times:

Thanks Colin. As always.

Chad


User currently offlineGharv From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3259 times:

Sorry colin, just to clarify, if the lens used on a DSLR it would give a zoom
range of 110-320mm ?


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 765 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3245 times:

The accurate thing to say is that it will result in an image with the same angle of view as a 110-320mm - there are some subtle differences, but, yes in effect you will get a zoom range of 110-320mm on a D60/10D/300D.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineBoieng747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

Hey,

I've been using the 70-200L f/4 lens since August 2003, I can only recommend it. The lens is very nice to deal with, quality is great and the light weight is another added benefit.

Take a look at my photos, most of them are taken with the 1.4x converter sticked on and using a 10D body.

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?photographersearch=Timothy%20Feise&distinct_entry=true

Cheers,
Tim


User currently offlineIsz1 From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 86 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3238 times:

Highly recommended! Hope this will help.

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Review:
http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/canon_ef70-200usm.htm
Good review from pro photographer with complete details,some photo,example and advice.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=14&sort=7&thecat=27
Rating: 4.9

Price: $579.95 @ Adorama. Shipping: international
Out of stock @ Bhphotovideo.com
http://www.adorama.com/refby.tpl?refby=pgrabl&sku=CA702004AFU&st=NA

Regards
Fairizuan



This is Malaysian Hospitality. This is MH.
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

Colin, so, what will a 100-400mm effectively give me as far as range used on the 300D (as well as the D60,D30,10D)?

Thanks..


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3193 times:

160-640mm. Just multiply the focal length by the crop factor. The 300D and 10D (also D60+30?) have a crop factor of 1.6. Other cameras have less and some more, like 1.0 (Canon 1Ds) and 2.0 (Olympus E-1).


MIA777
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3185 times:

WOW...

Is this just with Canon lenses? My uncle has a 300D, with the Sigma 170-500mm... Just curious. That is awesome. Thanks for the help.

Chad


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

No Chad, crop factor is just that. A reduction in the size of the sensor from a full 35mm film frame. Each manufacturer has their own reduction.

And to make it clear, .. Optically, you get no increase in focal length. Your 70-200, still only captures 70-200, you just get less of the frame.


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3188 times:

Yea its nice having a "maximum" of 800mm. No, it is not just with Canon lenses. The Nikon D100, for example has a c.f. of 1.5. Most DSLRs except for the high end 1Ds (1x) do have c.f.s. It's determined by the sensor size.


MIA777
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3181 times:

It sounds great to have a long focal length but the difference between 400mm and 500mm is only 1 degree. That compared to 70-200mm (around a 23 degress difference) is, to me at least negligible (in terms of aviation photography).


MIA777
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 15, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3180 times:

Thanks Colin and Ryan for this in depth info.  Big thumbs up


Chad


User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2822 posts, RR: 50
Reply 16, posted (10 years 10 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3113 times:

Although i have not used the 70-200F4L for aviation pics yet, i ahve used it for motorsport and wildlife with and without the 1.4xtc! IT is a great lens and one i am very proud to use, anyone considering this lens should buy it and not look back!!!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 17, posted (10 years 10 months 10 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

After reading all of the reviews, I wonder if this lens is for me. I just bought a Digital Rebel and the 75-300mm IS USM, but I've noticed it is not very fast at focusing. I was playing with a Canon 1 DS the other day at the local camera shop, and it had a L lens on it, and the focus speed was incredible. Would the lens you are discussing (70-200 L)have a faster focus than my 75-300 IS USM? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm new to SLR photography!

Thanks!
DREW



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (10 years 10 months 9 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

It would most likely be faster, however, how much is another question. I have a 70-200/2.8 IS which is VERY fast. If you want something with speed, I would go for that!


MIA777
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 19, posted (10 years 10 months 8 hours ago) and read 3054 times:

Its all about how much you want to spend. The Canon 70-200mm F/4 L is way less than the 2.8 IS and has better overall ratings. I think its only common sense to go with the lens that is better and less expensive. If you are going to be shooting in low light consistantly, then go with the 2.8 IS

User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (10 years 10 months 8 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

Those ratings you refer to Chad...I would imagine the 70-200/4 would have a higher "rating" due to the fact that it is more affordable and can be rated by more people. There are no lenses (zoom) to even compete with the 70-200/2.8L IS and think about it, what would you rather have, that or the f/4 version? If you are sticking to aviation photography and you only go out once in a while when it is sunny, etc., etc., the 70-200/4 would suit you perfectly. If you like shooting under all conditions a lot and have a "need for speed", the 70-200/2.8 is for you. Also, if weight is factor for you, the 70-200/4 is much lighter.

Ryan Kaskel - MIA



MIA777
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 21, posted (10 years 10 months 8 hours ago) and read 3044 times:

Ryan..


I am buying the 100-400mm L IS in a week or so. I know what IS does. I know what I would rather have. I am just going off of the rankings. I read the comments, and some people said that the only difference is that after "UPGRADING" to the 2.8 L IS, is that they could shoot in lower light. They also said that there is no noticeable difference as far as the sharpness, and some people even said the F/4 L was sharper. Its less heavy than the 2.8 L IS.

It seems like this lens will fit into his budget also. At least thats what he said in the original post. It works well for me. Though, I do not shoot every aircraft that I see either, so, maybe the 2.8 will last longer?  Big grin


I recommend F/4L.

[Edited 2004-02-04 04:59:54]

User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (10 years 10 months 8 hours ago) and read 3040 times:

I can assure you...I do not shoot every aircraft I see! Unless I am visiting an airport other than MIA.


MIA777
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 23, posted (10 years 10 months 7 hours ago) and read 3041 times:

GHARV,
You will not be dissapointed in the Canon Ef70-200 F4 L. Great lens, great price. Its not a "good for the price" lens, like the Sigma 170-500mm. Its a good lens PERIOD.


User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 24, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2963 times:

Just made a note that the price of this lens has gone down by about 100 € here in Europe (or at least in the German online shops) during the last one month or so. Ordered mine and should get it in about two weeks.

Anyone having a guess what's the reason for lowering the price? Haven't heard of any replacements...

-Joge



Bula!
25 Staffan : Canon has dumped prices on their high end lenses during the last year. I think it's mainly due to increased sales. Even in Sweden we are now seing pri
26 Dazultra : with the us dollar being so crap, a search on ebay found a shop in america selling this lens for $569.95. in pounds that is £297, which is quite a ba
27 Post contains images Joge : I'm actually getting mine for less than 500 euros. New. -Joge
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon Ef70-200 F4 L posted Sun Feb 1 2004 12:00:09 by Gharv
Canon 70-200 L F4 Is USM posted Tue Dec 10 2002 16:34:45 by PRM
For Sale: Canon 70-200 F4L - $519.99 - US Only posted Thu May 4 2006 19:53:45 by VasanthD
First Shot With New EF 70-200 F4 L Lens posted Sun Feb 19 2006 17:00:24 by Linco22
Sigma Or Canon 70-200 F2.8? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 18:25:30 by Morvious
Canon 70-200 F2.8 +2x Vs 100-400 posted Wed Nov 30 2005 23:42:06 by Donder10
Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 EX Vs Canon 70-200 F/4L posted Fri Jul 22 2005 07:30:42 by DLKAPA
Canon 70-200 2.8L Is Versus NON Is posted Thu Jul 14 2005 03:40:56 by Mongorat
70-200 F4 L Vs. 75-300 F4.5-5.6 I.S. posted Sat Mar 26 2005 01:01:50 by MartinairYYZ
70-200 F4 And 300D posted Mon Jan 31 2005 13:49:15 by MRB747