Xenon From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 494 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 17 hours ago) and read 2146 times:
I think that yellow box in front of the picture is somewhat distracting!
Also that big crane in the back isn't helping your pic.
I had several picture ruined by that "additional" ramp stuff on my
For the rest, great picture Aaron!
Keep them coming.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month ago) and read 1984 times:
Here is what I see:
1-BA tail infront, and something else underneath and behind. Starboard mains hidden.
2-stabilator and right wingtip missing/cutoff.
3-not as bad as the first two, but there sure is a lot of junk in the foreground.
Just an opionion. But those items listed could have been avoided.
Work4bmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1954 times:
Thanks for the replies folks - really appreciate your replies. I will not consider an appeal, as it seems fair that there were too many obstructions and such like preventing this photo's life on a.net
I was considering some Photoshop skills to eliminate these obstructions, but then does the be deemed cheating? One final note, is that Danny Hill had a successfull upload of the same aircraft anyway (I was with him at the time) so really no need.
Its been great hearing from you and you have all helped me and also saved an appeal to the already increasing high amount of pictures to be screened.
Andrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 42
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1949 times:
I hate looking at rejected shots, especially ones as good as this one - it makes my stomach sink because I currently have a few in the upload queue, and they're nowhere near as good as what's getting rejected.
Recently I made the upgrade from a 4 megapixel point-and-shoot (Olympus C-4040Z) to a Canon Digital Rebel, and I'm learning a lot about it. I went to ATL and BHM to do some spotting, and brought home close to 100 images, 7 of which I cleaned up and uploaded. Only time will tell I guess!
This is one of them, I can't help but wonder if I've just added 7 rejections to my record!
Although you state that these were rejected for Bad Motiv to match with the thread, two of these shots were not rejected for bad motiv at all.
More often than not, if you see what you may consider as being marginal "bad motiv", then look for other reasons. In all three, I would have been quite specific as to the one of two reasons I would have rejected.
I sometimes mark the main reason only.... but I try to be diligent and provide you all with the reasons you might require in fixing the image or in some cases, choosing another in the sequence
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...