Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Better Chance If First Pic?  
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12281 posts, RR: 35
Posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1975 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

I am going to Aspen on Tuesday, and noticed that there are no pics in the database of XJ Avros there. Will my pics have a better chance of getting accepted because of this?


“Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, an
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpotterboy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

Why a better chance, I think you dont get "priority" or "good" chances to get an image accepted just because there was no photo of this airline / airplane at that airport. If the quality is there it will pass, if not you'll get it rejected.

regards, Florian


User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1928 times:

Hi,

from the add photos page:

"We have lower rejection levels for rare shots (old, brand new, special paint scheme, accident, special situations etc).
Even "normal" aircraft from the bigger airlines can be rare (check registration - does it exist in the database?)."

Maybe i´m wrong, but doesn´t that mean, there is a better chance of acceptance???

regards,

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1927 times:

No,

It applies to new registrations/paint scemes/accidents/unusual angles/spectacular views etc. Not just a first picture of an airline serving an airport (unless its say, an A380 serving Washington or something crazy).


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1915 times:

To me, a rare photo is a photo of something that is very unlikely to be photographed again, maybe because it's a one time situation that won't happen again in the near future, or a subject that doesn't exist anymore.

Isn't there a difference bewteen rare and unique? Some will imply that a certain aircraft at a certain airport at a certain angle at a certain time of day is a rare photo because there are no such examples on this site. Unique yes, rare.... I wouldn't think so.

Staffan



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Better Chance If Rare? posted Thu Jan 29 2004 02:31:17 by Leviticus
My First Pic With My Nikon D50 posted Sat Apr 29 2006 02:05:12 by Pilotallen
First Pic On Anet! posted Wed Apr 26 2006 06:07:01 by NathanT2778
First Pic Up. Finally :) posted Fri Sep 30 2005 22:01:55 by DeltaWings
First Pic Accepted Finally! posted Wed Aug 24 2005 19:22:16 by Boeingfan71
First Pic In Magazine Published Today :) posted Fri Jul 15 2005 18:23:21 by EZYAirbus
First Pic Of Nippon Cargo B747-400F posted Wed Jun 29 2005 08:41:03 by Airbuseric
Got My First Pic Accepted! posted Sat Oct 30 2004 11:48:07 by A319114
AvianceGirlUK Gets First Pic Accepted! posted Mon Oct 18 2004 14:15:45 by UTA_flyingHIGH
Uploading My First Pic posted Thu Aug 26 2004 01:45:35 by Airtrainer