Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon EF 300mm F/4.0L Is?  
User currently offlinePatroni From Luxembourg, joined Aug 1999, 1403 posts, RR: 14
Posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3893 times:

Hello,

I was just wondering if anyone here has experience with the Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS in aviation photography? I recently saw some detail shots of taxiing aircraft which looked razor-sharp, but how is the result with faster moving objects?

Also, does the image stabilizer still work when panning or is it an earlier IS which is mainly made for standing objects?

At the moment I have the Canon 70-200/F4 L USM and am very happy with it, have also thought of buying the 100-400/3.5-5.6 L IS USM, but maybe a 300mm would be a better choice, even if it does not offer the flexibility of a zoom?

Sorry if this has already been posted, but the search function didn't bring any result.

Cheers,

Tom

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3816 times:

I am in exactly the same boat as you Tom, but after testing both lenses i have chosen on the 100-400! Although it is not as fast or as sharp, it is much more flexible and alot better suited to aviation photography!!! The 100-400 can produce some amazing images, just have a look at Ryan Hemmings for proof!!!

If you get this lens you will not be dissapointed!!!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3796 times:

This is pretty much my "standard" lens for aviation, and it can be used with convertors for greater reach (though you will loose AF).

IS is 2 mode and works well for panning.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3785 times:

Colin,

Do you really find a fixed focus lens that good for aviation photography at UK airports???

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3784 times:

Hi Colin,

Do you lose the AF even with only one teleconverter attached?

Thomas


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3765 times:

You'll have AF with the 1.4, but not with the 2X.

Staffan


User currently offlineFireguy274 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 299 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3758 times:

You loose the AF with the 1.4 Staffan I have the 100-400L IS USM and the 1.4. I do loose the AF with it. This is a great lens Tom and I can highly suggest it. I have both the 100-400 and the 70-200 2.8L IS USM. I like the 70-200 a little better but you cant beat the reach with the 100-400. I think the lens is more versatile than the 300 fixed and you will be happier with it...Artie.

User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3754 times:

That depends on the lens. The 300 is f/4 and will be f/5.6 with the 1.4. The 100-400 is f/5.6 and will be f/8 with the 1.4. Only EOS 1 & 3 have AF over f/5.6.

Staffan


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

AF - 2x gives an effective aperture of f8 - AF will work only on top end Canon bodies (EOS 1,3 1D 1Ds). AF will work with the 1.4 (effective aperture is 5.6 when used with the 300).

Chris - fact is I use 2 bodies, and usually have the 70-200 on one body, the 300 (usually with a convertor) on the other. If I was using 1 body, I probably would have kept my 100-400, though in practice I don't find fixed focal lengths particularly problematic.

As with all things its a tradeoff - convenience against quality, though don't overlook the fact that with convertors, the 300 can give you more reach than the 100-400

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3747 times:

I guess i'll just have to get the new 1dmkII!!! LOL I'm sure i can live with it!!! I think the 1DmkII with a 100-400 and the 10D with a 300mm w/1.4xII attached!!!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineFireguy274 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 299 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3691 times:

I have the Canon 10D and the 1.4X extender. The 100-400L USM IS will not work on auto focus with the 1.4X extender. If you read the manual for the extender it tells you this and I have tried it. Stay safe....Artie

User currently offlineLyzzard From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 404 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3688 times:

The 100-400L AF with a converter will not work with anything above f/5.6. So at 400mm, it becomes something like an f/11 as the 2x will add 2 stops. I recently purchased a Canon 2x MkII extender and was quite disappointed with the overall results. I think it will be best suited to something like a 70-200 f/2.8 where AF is still available. You're definitely in tripod country if u add that converter on a 100-400L.

I did attempt a couple of shots on moving subjects. Imagine trying to focus, zoom in/out with a setup that long and heavy. Results improved greatly with the cam on a tripod.


User currently offlinePatroni From Luxembourg, joined Aug 1999, 1403 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3675 times:

Thanks guys for the interesting discussion. I only have one body (speaking of my camera), so probably the 100-400 is the more practical solution....

Even though the fixed length 300mm sounds tempting, especially with the 2-mode IS.... Ah well, I still have some time before I get the right... mood ($$$) to buy a third lense, and next month I have the opportunity to try the 100-400. I am still a bit sceptical whether I would like the push/pull zoom though.

Cheers,

Tom


User currently offlineRotor1 From Tajikistan, joined Mar 2003, 230 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3646 times:

IIRC, the 100-400L has 2-mode IS as well. Mode 2 worked very well for me when I tried out 2912n's lens:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike "Rotor" Nowak



Try that with a single mode IS lens!

-Mike



The best aviation photo I've ever taken was rejected by Airliners.net
User currently offlinePatroni From Luxembourg, joined Aug 1999, 1403 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3572 times:

As a first step I have now ordered the Canon 1.4 EF extender to go with my 70-200/F4 L lens. Should give me 280mm (440mm eff.) at F5.6. And the price of 300EUR (US import, incl. customs duty, shipping, VAT) vs 415EUR (Germany) was too tempting....

Regarding the difference between the 300/F4 and the 100-400/4.5-5.6, I was surprised to read in a test that the fixed length 300 with IS actually scored not as good as the 100-400.... the old 300/F4 without IS got better results.

These tests can be found here : http://www.photodo.com/nav/prodindex.html

So I think the next addition might be the 100-400...

Cheers,
Tom




User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3560 times:

I've seen many photodo results queried in the past - and none more so than this one. Having had both lenses, I have no hesitation in saying that the 300 is better than the 100-400 at any aperture - hell, the 300 & 1.4 is better than the 100-400 at 400mm.

Not just my view - I've seen this result queried many times in various forums.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3564 times:

Damn you Colin, just after i was all set on the 100-400 you throw that into the works!!! I dont know what to do now!!!! Grrr!!!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlinePatroni From Luxembourg, joined Aug 1999, 1403 posts, RR: 14
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3508 times:

Argh.. Colin, now it was all just so nicely set up (Zoom = greater flexibility + better test results = BUY!!) and then you just let this nice bubble burst  Big grin

I will use the next weeks to play with my 1.4 extender and test the usual locations at my home airport to see whether a fixed length 300 would be practical there or whether it would guarantee to get the windsocks and lamp posts in the way all the time. Next month I'll test the 100-400 myself and after that I will - hopefully - be much wiser (and probably much poorer....) than now.

Thanks for your great help!

Cheers,
Tom



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 Is USM posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:41:22 by FlyingZacko
Canon EF 28-135mm Is posted Tue Apr 1 2003 03:35:00 by Siggi757
Canon EOS 50E With Canon EF75-300mm "is" posted Thu Sep 28 2000 16:47:53 by Flowings
Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L Is USM posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:51:24 by Brick
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Review Wanted posted Thu Apr 6 2006 12:01:46 by Deaphen
New Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Oct 19 2005 00:12:17 by TRVYYZ
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Tue Jul 9 2002 14:59:50 by Granite
For Sale: Canon 70-300mm Is + 350D + Grip posted Thu Jul 27 2006 21:44:00 by Manc
Lense Thoughts: Canon EF 100-400mm F/2.8L Is USM posted Thu Jun 29 2006 21:56:02 by Aero145