Bruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5089 posts, RR: 14 Posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2873 times:
I have had decent results lately on uploads and then I went to a place where I could shoot upclose and what happens? 22 out of 22 rejected! Badscan was the most common reason. And this email for 18 of the 22 did not have the "screener in training" disclaimer so I assume it is not an issue with a new screener learning the ropes. AND, I think they were all rejected on first screening!! How are these "badscans"??? Have the standards been raised again? Would uploading these at smaller size like 1200x800 help? Can someone please comment here? Something just does not seem right. This is extremely unusual.
Bruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5089 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2757 times:
well, now how did you get rid of that blue???? My original was worse than the rejected one; I had fixed it as I normally do but yours looks much better! do you use photoshop? did you just reduce the blue channel or ???
Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens