Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bad Motiv!?  
User currently offlineHeliporter From Switzerland, joined Jul 2003, 140 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2585 times:

Here had been pointed out so many great AVIATION photos actually rejected as badmotiv ... and now a.net proudly presents this - Something is just going wrong!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



/// Markus


Markus Herzig - Swiss Helicopters, Pilatus Porter and Aviation Photography
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2526 times:

I like this shot, there are more lavatory shots on a.net


User currently offlineNavigator From Sweden, joined Jul 2001, 1208 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2518 times:

This is the seat most of us use on a flight. Now with a window... Fantastic !!


747-400/747-200/L1011/DC-10/DC-9/DC-8/MD-80/MD90/A340/A330/A300/A310/A321/A320/A319/767/757/737/727/HS-121/CV990/CV440/S
User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

I had a lav shot rejected for badmotiv a while back. Strange thing was it was an historic aircraft so there was definitely something noteworthy about it.

Oh well. Sh!t happens.



User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

aaargh I saw that photo while I was eating my lunch.

Luis


User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2446 times:

Luis: It's a clean lavatory :P

User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2448 times:

but made me think about its use  Big grin

Luis


User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2440 times:

Hello guys,

That's actually a nice lavatory! You should have a look at the Ruslan's dunny.  Big thumbs up

MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © AAA Henry Yeh


But seriously, I think the pic should have its place in the db as it shows a remarkable feature (lavatory with window) of a fairly new aircraft (still newsworthy).

Thomas


User currently offlineBigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2433 times:

We'd have to see YOUR shot in order to tell what was wrong with it.




Phil Derner Jr.
User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2419 times:

Hey Phil ...



"You talkin' to ME?"

Here you go. A sparkling clean Strato-potty:



I'd feel terrible using it. So pretty.

William

A I R F R A M E S [ < ]


User currently offlineQantas077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5855 posts, RR: 39
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

i took a photo of the electronics bay of a BAe-146 and it got badmotiv, i would have thought a photo of an essential part of the plane would be more noteworthy than a photo of a toilet...

:S



a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2376 times:

There is no part on an aircraft MORE important than the toilet.

Ask anyone on a flight longer than 25 min...



User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2361 times:

Come on these are not aviation photographs. Shame to upload that.
I guess I need to shoot train lav and upload as an aircraft one  Yeah sure

[Edited 2004-02-26 23:40:56]

User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 13, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2344 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Exitrow, LOL on your shot  Smile

Oh, for some of you, lavatory onboard is not part of airplane??? not aviation related but it surely is taken inside an airplane cabin just like cockpit or seats???  Acting devilish

I just thought the lavatory with a view on the brand new A340-500 is something nice for a change!

I am simply enjoying that shot! Wait for more part to come on the A340-500  Smile

Sam


User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2332 times:

To some people, airplanes taking off and landing is aviation photography.

To others, it's cabin shots.

And to yet others, flight decks are their cup of tea. I'd never scold anyone for shooting whatever they find interesting about aircraft.

Me? I am all about toilets. And until Johan or Henrik start Loos.net, I'll upload as many toilet shots as humanly possible from now on.

William

A I R F R A M E S [ < ]


User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

Sorry but when I see shots like this:
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=AC744C-GAGN0222042.jpg
rejected as bad while toilets are good then say that somethings wrong is happening here.


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2293 times:

At least Sam's toilet shot is not yellow like Grants....  Big grin Bill, correct the color on that crapper and it's in!

nothing wrong in my book...


User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2288 times:

Jeff...

That color IS correct. It REALLY was pink in there. I am not kidding. (It was badmotiv anyway.)

Sorry but when I see shots like this... rejected as bad while toilets are good then say that somethings wrong is happening here.

No disagreement on that point. Better to bring it up with the screeners though. Us honeybucket-shooters have no control over the screening process.


William

A I R F R A M E S [ < ]


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

so.... do you just "practice" on the old homestead's latrine?  Big grin

User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 19, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2267 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well Danny...you can ask the screener....I uploaded with minimal hope that shot will be accepted....yet I got it after it sat in the queue struggle for a while....I guess I just got lucky and I am surprised too...nothing more than luck to be honest. There is NO shame for me to upload a toilet shot at all. I am loving it! Sure there is people appreciate a brane new aircraft cabin A340-500 with toilet included. I've seen many likewise shot here before, do a search yourself to see....Have a nice day.  Smile

I have no idea about Grant's shot....I am not a screener here.

Sam


User currently offlineCicadajet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2235 times:

Yes, I can remember similar shots added previously; Sam's right.

The Strat ought to have made the cut (and possibly the Ruslan as well)....


User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2217 times:

For that Air Canada shot, change the White Balance shot to like it more white. Maybe the screeners like it more.

User currently offlineUTA_flyinghigh From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 50
Reply 22, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2212 times:

Cool. I shall henceforth reupload my A321 lavatory pic.
I'll keep you posted on the rejection motive and provide the link.

Will



Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
User currently offlineBigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 54
Reply 23, posted (10 years 6 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

Yeah, Danny, I agree with that reject too. The white IS off quite bit.


Phil Derner Jr.
User currently offlineLyzzard From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 404 posts, RR: 13
Reply 24, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

This is one of mine which was rejected about 2 months ago for badmotiv. Any comments?

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=sia-flight-a345-9vsga-0103-6toilet.jpg

[Edited 2004-02-28 04:00:02]

25 Post contains images Airbus Lover : Lyzzard, I assume yours were rejected for badmotiv? Because I think it is a perfect shot and taken with much light from outside using no flash... If s
26 JeffM : There is a big difference between those two shots.... focus for one thing.
27 Lyzzard : Yea, it's a little soft at the door area and the bottom of the potty. Maybe I should've USMed the heck out of it and see if that would've worked. What
28 JeffM : I'm not sure usm will save those parts. It looks like the photo was taken with too shallow a depth of field. But, it never hurts to try.
29 Hpr7 : Hi Folks, I was coing to start a separate topic, but I see that Markus has beat me to it, anyway my thoughts are listed below. Sorry to say this but A
30 IL76 : I guess there is a 'market' for interior shots on A.net, as they seem to be very popular. Speaking for myself, in the past 8 years I've been browsing
31 Ryangooner : why on earth looking at a toilet could interest anyone out there is totally beyond me. I shall stick to photographing aircraft and aircraft only, I ca
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad Motiv? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 11:06:07 by AirMalta
Bad Motiv Rejection Help posted Wed Sep 20 2006 13:44:54 by Raptors
Bad Motiv In Cockpit Landing: Why? :( posted Thu May 25 2006 09:42:00 by Dcrusafon
Help With 'bad-Motiv' ..... Please! posted Tue May 16 2006 23:18:15 by Sesd97
Bad Motiv Or Not? posted Sun Mar 19 2006 23:34:53 by 9VSPO
Bad Motiv Or Not?! posted Tue Mar 14 2006 20:25:40 by Tom3
A Bad Motiv Rejection. Can Anybody Clarify Me Why? posted Thu Jan 19 2006 17:41:02 by Mygind66
Is This Bad Motiv? posted Wed Dec 21 2005 16:14:08 by BmiBaby737
A Bad Motiv? posted Tue Nov 29 2005 23:27:17 by Manzoori
Bad Motiv For Nose Shots?! posted Tue Jun 14 2005 19:28:15 by Tom3