Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New United Livery Rejected!  
User currently offlineOlivex From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 13 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2933 times:

Got this one rejected for distance:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=Unitednew_n390ua_ord_26feb_2.jpg

And this one for quality:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=Unitednew_n390ua_ord_26feb_3.jpg

What do you guys think?  Sad


Oliver (ORD)


ORD Spotter using my new DiMage 7Hi
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOlivex From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2909 times:

Opps forgot to add one more..I thought this one was really cool...but i guess not  Sad
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=american_n776an_ord_20feb.jpg

Oliver (ORD)



ORD Spotter using my new DiMage 7Hi
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2908 times:

TONE THEM DOWN!!!

They're very overexposed, even on my monitor (which underexposes everything)

I don't think the shutter speed for the Engine is appropriate, I would've given it a nice 1/250 sec, and it'd be fine, unless you're shooting in total darkness.



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

They seem a bit overexposed but read the rejection reason. It's bad quality which I agree with (even though I am using a cheap flat panel). I like the composition of the first shot but again, the quality is poor.


MIA777
User currently offlineEmmett99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2789 times:

1) Crop it if you can, and a little less exposure.
2) Look at the tail. Grainy. Again less exposure.
3) Not sure if you are going for artsy-fartsy (which a.net doesn't like) or it is way overexposed.
Anyhow, keep trying.

Bill


User currently offlineLHRman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 398 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2594 times:

Personally I like them, myself!

Thanks LHRman  Big thumbs up



Always after the picture you can't get..
User currently offlineFireguy274 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 299 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2568 times:

The first two look way oversharpened to me. The third overexposed...Artie

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2552 times:

I agree with the screeners, and with Vitaly. Tone them down and crop them.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help! 1st Shots Of New Airline Go! Rejected. posted Tue May 9 2006 06:24:10 by Phxplanes
My RJ85 In New NW Colors Rejected!... Why? posted Thu Mar 31 2005 08:19:33 by GulfstreamGuy
I Tried Something New....it Got Rejected... posted Fri Jan 23 2004 19:23:33 by Gmonney
New NWA Livery Photos? posted Fri Apr 4 2003 15:20:18 by Sunilgupta
New EVA Livery posted Sat Dec 8 2001 15:32:51 by Senatorto
United 737 New Livery! posted Fri Feb 27 2004 13:12:19 by Olivex
Bahamasair New Livery: Special Or Normal? posted Sun Dec 18 2005 18:05:01 by KFLLCFII
New US/HP Livery Rollout At PHL. Can't Wait To See posted Tue Aug 23 2005 03:44:26 by NIKV69
Rejected Photos, New List posted Fri Nov 12 2004 20:56:13 by Henks
Air Berlin - New Livery Photo Contest posted Fri May 21 2004 17:49:00 by Geizistgeil