Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Getting Info Right When Uploading  
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3855 times:

Hi All,

Just a quick note while screening...

Thanks to the majority of you for getting your info right. Most of you know your stuff and get aircraft types, registrations and serials spot on. Sometimes you get the info so right, you have me scratching my head as to how you got it (for the rare types).

I'd like to send out a message though to some of the other's who get their information a little out of kilter.

If you receive a rejection for bad info, please try to understand where the mistake is and correct it. If that rejection is the only one for a shot, it simply means the shot is absolutely fine and will be accepted if the information is corrected.

So to help some of you, some words of advice:


US Military registrations:
Easy to get wrong, generally always in format XX-XXXX and never specifically what you see on the fuselage. Look the reg up using:
http://users.rcn.com/jeremy.k/serialSearch.html
Search Airliners.net for that type. Try to get it right.
Know also that Boeing aircraft (e.g. 737BBJ) are not considered 737
s in the USAF, but instead usually have a C- designation. In this case, a C-40B.

Airport Overviews:
If displaying an airport from the window of an aircraft, and the aircraft is not visible DO NOT upload under that reg and type. Do not select window view category.
Instead mark the airline, aircraft type and generic type with just a dash (e.g. "-").

Manufacturer Serials (msn/cn):
Use common databases found on net to retrieve this info:
E.g. http://home.hccnet.nl/p.w.riool/
Try to upload Boeing's/DC's in format XXXXX/XXX

Get the type, right:
If uploading simply everyday airliner shots, you should know the difference between for example, a 777-200 and a 777-300. Try not to upload using 777...
If you can, get the specific type e.g. 747-438. (Typical Qantas 747-400)

Marginal shots are better with registrations:
Often marginal shots come down to database content. Do we have a shot of the registration or not?
If you marginal shot doesn't have a registration, we cannot assume either way. More than likely a marginal shot without a registration (depending completely on location/airline/age of shot), may be considered to be too common and hence not be accepted.
If a reg was included with some of these shots, they would have an additional advantage.

Hope this helps...


Kindest Regards,

Glenn



[Edited 2004-03-11 14:58:23]


Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3704 times:

Worth adding....

With digital cameras these days, you can always get correct dates.
I am seeing far too many "January 2004" shots instead of "January 25th 2004".

If you have a digital camera, I would recommend getting the ACDSee viewer. It can mass re-name shots using the template _#.
This means you'll never have to look inside the EXIF ever again to note date and time. You'll always have a unique name when uploading, and better still... when developing, you'll have the date on the back of the shot (if your developer prints names on the back).

My current naming is:

Qantas_747-438_VH-OJB_2003-01-31_14-58-24_1_SYD.jpg
When printed on the back of a shot, even if I can't see the reg, I know exactly what, where and when I took the shot.

ACDSee renames parts of it automatically for me  Smile

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 4030 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3697 times:

What is EXIF?

We have ACDSee on the computer upstairs. I can use that program to change a filename the way you did in your example?

Kas


User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5499 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3673 times:

Another good point to add on the file names is use your initials, I usually add mine in the end. VirginA300600NRTjc.jpg etc etc.

Justin


User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3627 times:

Kas,

EXIF is data stored with the photo you take.
This includes shutterspeed, aperture, Camera, date and more.
You can see this in Photoshop when you select File > File Info...
In Windows XP explorer click right on the file and select hmmm... don't know the English name, Properties (Eigenschappen) I guess.


User currently offlineMikec From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 247 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

In case anyone didn't already know these, try G-INFO at http://www.caa.co.uk/srg/aircraft_register/ginfo/search.asp for UK registered aircraft information and http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm to search the FAA registry for a US registered aircraft info.

User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3588 times:

Excellent Links Mike, Thanks! Adding them to my favourites right now!

To add to what's already been said (and I know it's painfully obvious Big grin ) but please make sure you use the huge database we have at our disposal... what's it called....erm... oh yeah! Airliners.net!  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers!

Rez
 Big thumbs up



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3585 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

One word: Google Smile

Just type in the serial and you'd be surprised how much info is on there.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlinePlanedoctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 286 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3573 times:

EXIF is coding that is added to .jpeg and other file types by most digital cameras. .TIF files can hold EXIF info as well (or any data, I have heard, depending on how it is encoded). Many image manipulation programs, such as older versions of Photoshop will not re-write the EXIF data once the file has been re-written (ie if you edit a file in Photoshop and then save the file). I am not sure which versions of Photoshop discard the EXIF, but I know the Photoshop CS does not (although it can have troubles of its own where it adds some of its own data). It is amazing to see how much data is actually encoded in the EXIF when you get a program that can read it all out. I discovered (via a post at dpreview.com) that there is a way to see exactly how many times my 1D/1Ds cameras have written to the memory card- (as opposed to just looking at file names, which are only accurate up to 10,000 shots, and change if you use a different memory card or if you reset the counter). EXIF can be a great asset to the digital photographer if you know what to look for. EXIF read is a neat free little program that spits out all your EXIF info on files, and if you know what you are looking for, there is coded information for just about everything you can think of. The link is http://www.takenet.or.jp/~ryuuji/minisoft/exifread/english/

If anyone has a 1D or 1Ds and you want to know how to use this info on the number of shots you've taken, I can point you to the source of how I found this out!  Smile

-Ken


User currently offlineCathay112 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3546 times:

I agree with Glenn, the number of people with digital cameras that don't complete the proper date details is growing. I can understand for flight crew taking in flight cockpit shots because they may choose not to reveal who they are. But for general, run of the mill aircraft shots I firmly believe the shot should be rejected for "badlazy". Please note I am only refering to digital users as I wouldn't expect Johan, Frank, Joe, the De Groot's etc etc to remember the exact date of a slide taken in 1932 of a Tiger Moth taxiing at Unapalomablanca.......



User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

Dammit!  Angry  Angry

I've got that wretched song going around in my head now!  Wink/being sarcastic

Rez
 Big thumbs up



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineCicadajet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3536 times:

There are a number of reasons (that may not be obvious) why people may not wish to include an exact date on the images they upload here.

We should not assume it always a matter of being lazy.

Tom


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3522 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Tom is exactly right. It doesn't have anything to do with being lazy.

User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

A quick note from me regarding locations & categories.

Please use the drop down lists! I found 3 photos earlier at SXM where the photographer hadn't used the drop down lists and made up his own name for the location field, which meant it wasn't included in searches for photos at SXM. If the location you want isn't in the list, go to the Photo Index and see what other people ae using, remember to copy the name exactly, just a space missed out means that it's a different entry:
http://www.airliners.net/search/indexsearch.main

Categories - One of those SXM photos was an airport overview, yet wasn't included in the airport category. If you want those hits, please try to put it under the correct categories, it will help visitors find your photo.  Big thumbs up

Josh


User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3490 times:

I agree with Tom and Royal regarding the date issue.


Jet City Aviation Photography
User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3491 times:

I second Josh about using the drop down lists. They are made for the photographers, why not use them.

Exactly the same for aircraft types: I'm going through all ARJ's of Sabena/SN Brussels/..., and it is often amazing to see what some people invent!

The majority of the photographers does a good research, but the others can be irritating sometimes...

Frederic


User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 16, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3432 times:

Hi All,

Above the template for the file rename in ACDSee didn't turn out due to the code being surrounded by less than and greater than characters.
Anyway... point was that I really find this feature handy.

It will change

DSC_1234.JPG
DSC_1235.JPG
DSC_1236.JPG

into

2003-03-12 15-46-23_1.jpg
2003-03-12 15-46-23_2.jpg
2003-03-12 15-46-23_3.jpg

(Yes, even handy for those people who hold down the shutter to capture three shots during the same second).

See: http://www.acdsystems.com/English/Products/ACDSee/index.htm

--

Regards to dates:

Unless you have to hide a specific date (e.g. cockpit shots or ramp access where staff/crew may be held liable for whatever reason), then sure - provide the month and year.
Other than this, I don't think digital shooters have an excuse. EXIF's don't lie (unless you don't set the time or forget to change when going through time zones)

I agree with Craig with regards to slide shooters. Then again, the number of slide shooters who are also very precise when it comes to recording registrations when they're shot, are usually good at knowing excactly which date and which roll they used.
Slide shooters out there... if you can only provide your best estimate, then that's fine. But the closer you can get to the date, the better.

I was screening some shots the other night and went back into the database for that reg to compare. It was obvious to me at the time, that the JAL I as looking at must have been dated incorrectly. It pictured an old livery JAL shot January 2004 that had clearly (from other shots) been painted into new livery since late last year. Either the date was out, or the reg was.
Simple checking like this should be down to the photographer.

Glenn





Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineDB777 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 885 posts, RR: 43
Reply 17, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3392 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey Glenn, where did you come up with your World's oldest International Airport thing on the bottom of your posts? According to a Sydney airport history site, it was declared to be an international airport in 1935 but doesn't mention actual international service being there at the time. Do you have better information on this?

If it was indeed 1935 then it was 8 years (October 28, 1927) after Pan Am started the first scheduled international service by a US airline with flights from Key West to Havana, Cuba. Wouldn't this make Key West and Havana the first international airports or not?

Don



Photographing aircraft since the Earth was flat and on Airliners.net since #338
User currently offline9A-CRO From Croatia, joined Jun 2000, 1574 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3362 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Also try to use Auto Complete and choose green entries, and most specific if there are multiple etc.

747-4..
747-436
you choose 436

Also to mention
http://www.eucomairlines.de
A great resource on Tristars




When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward...
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 19, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3354 times:

A great resource on Tristars and a website who likes to use photos without proper authorization from the photographers. I suggest to check it, maybe someone gets a surprise.

BTW, can someone translate this text please:

"Bei dieser Homepage handelt es sich um eine rein private Homepage, mit der ich keinerlei kommerzielle Interessen verfolge. Sämtliche hier zusammengestellten Informationen sind nach bestem Wissen zusammengetragen, erheben jedoch keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Für die betreffenden Informationen übernehme ich keine Gewähr hinsichtlich ihrer Aktualität, Korrektheit, Vollständigkeit sowie Qualität. Soweit nicht besonders gekennzeichnet stammen die Texte, Fotos sowie Grafiken von mir und unterliegen damit meinem Copyright."

thanks
Luis

[Edited 2004-03-13 22:04:23]

User currently offline9A-CRO From Croatia, joined Jun 2000, 1574 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3339 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Are you sure they didn't ask.

BTW.
You can check EXIF date info when you upload in Open file dialog if you hold mouse over thumbnail for a few seconds.



When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward...
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 21, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

Yes, I'm sure, they had one of mine here:

http://www.eucomairlines.de/prodlist/msn241.html

now it's removed, but the webmaster doesn't know that he must ask permission first before using photos that doesn't belong to him.

Luis


User currently offlineEmbraer145 From Netherlands, joined Feb 2001, 311 posts, RR: 11
Reply 22, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

For info about constructionnumbers and types of aircraft? Look at http://www.airlinerlist.com and you will find the constructionnumber, the linenumber and the type addition in one view. You can also see the history of the aircraft you have on your photo.

Hope it helps

Aart



DAI - Dutch Aviation Images.
User currently offlineEmmett99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3266 times:

Don't know about the others, but if you are skipping out on work and your taking shots at the local airport, you really don't want someone who might fire you having proof that you were there, when you should have been at work. The same thing probably works with wives also.  Innocent

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Oops! Forgot To Select Right Boxes When Uploading. posted Sat Jul 26 2003 18:57:44 by EGGD
Use Of Autofill When Uploading Compulsory Or Not? posted Mon Sep 4 2006 00:35:48 by Irish251
Error When Uploading Picture! posted Wed Sep 29 2004 21:26:27 by YULtoPEI
Problem When Uploading. posted Mon Sep 27 2004 21:09:00 by MADtoCAE
New Feature When Uploading posted Sat May 1 2004 13:21:26 by Codeshare
Screener Request: Please Enter Cn When Uploading posted Sat Apr 24 2004 14:06:20 by TZ
Getting The Quality Settings Right posted Tue Apr 4 2006 08:54:09 by AirbusA346
How To Do When Registered Info Is Bad Info? posted Wed Jan 25 2006 21:20:43 by Frippe
Ticket The Right Box While Uploading DC-2 Pic. posted Mon Jul 18 2005 17:18:11 by Embraer145
Getting The Colourbalance Right posted Sun Sep 7 2003 12:51:03 by Staffan