Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon RAW (.crw)  
User currently offlineUnited4everDEN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2122 times:

I need to know if it worth shotting in RAW format? I want the best quality, memory is not a concern.

Thanks
Ryan

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2095 times:

Yes.

But if you do not know what the advantages and differences of RAW vs. JPG/TIF is, you should look into that first.



Jet City Aviation Photography
User currently offlinePlanedoctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 286 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2079 times:

For high-volume shooting (sports) I shoot jpeg. No time to edit much. For landscapes, portraits, etc. I shoot RAW. The 16-bit (12-bit, really) of RAW gives you much smoother gradations when you mess around with curves a lot. For shooting planes I still shoot RAW most of the time. But like Bronko said, you should look at the advantages/ disadvantages before making your choice.

-Ken


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5576 posts, RR: 63
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2035 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Ryan

I am now shooting Canon RAW for everything.
A little longer in the processing but I am liking it. Now that I have portable storage it makes more sense to me.

I will be getting some Photobox prints done soon so I should be able to see a slight difference in larger prints.

Regards

Gary Watt


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 763 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2018 times:

OK. its a bit extreme, but I think about it as RAW="negative" JPG="print".
The prints may be stunning, but, if you haven't kept the negative, you can never go back and create a fresh print.

So why might you want to create a new print? Sometimes your initial thougts on the pic change - I've often gone back to an old image and decided it was better "printed" darker or lighter. Also every month we see new processing software appear - I like to be in the position to go back to older images and perhaps improve the sharpening or reduce noise a little more.

While you can of course re-edit a jpg, it is important to realise the jpg processing is destructive - every edit you make is throwing away irreplaceable data. Sort of like scanning a print to edit the image (OK, I'm exaggerating for effect  Smile)

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineVaman From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 328 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1993 times:

Im new to his digital business. I have been shooting in raw converting to tiffs then keeping the tiffs on a cd and deleting the raw files. Should i be keeping the raw files too?


L


User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

I have been shooting in raw converting to tiffs then keeping the tiffs on a cd and deleting the raw files.
Doesn't make much sense to me. To use Colin's comparison that would be like burning your slide after getting the pic printed. Plus, RAW files are much smaller than TIFs. I'm not yet in the situation of having dozens of gigabytes of files, but in the future I'll make a JPEG copy of every RAW file I want to keep. This way it's easier to archive the files than just having the RAWs.

Thomas


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 763 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1983 times:

I'd look on archiving .tifs as the least useful option - you have all the hassle of processing, extra storage requirements, but you still don't have an "original" for future work/experimentation.

For thos who feel that the need to process RAW files is too time consuming, note that the Canon RAW files (not sure about other makes) contain an "embedded" jpg image. If you don't want to process all your RAWs, you can simply extract all the embedded jpgs (a quick one click process with most RAW software) and use these jpgs for review, indexing etc.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Editing Canon RAW (CR2) Format posted Thu Feb 3 2005 20:57:09 by Janne
Canon RAW Question posted Tue May 25 2004 23:19:20 by Bronko
Canon RAW (.crw) posted Sun Mar 14 2004 04:45:40 by United4everDEN
Photoshop W/RAW From (Nikon D80 || Canon EOS 400D) posted Tue Oct 3 2006 07:55:50 by Domokun
Where Are My RAW Files On My Canon 20D? posted Tue Jul 5 2005 10:29:29 by Sfilipowicz
RAW Format = CRW? Help posted Sun Dec 26 2004 01:02:53 by Res
Raw Vs Jpeg - Canon D30 posted Fri May 16 2003 12:07:01 by FLYBHX
Canon D60: RAW And Jpeg posted Wed Aug 28 2002 16:09:54 by RWY-16
Canon EOS Mark IIN posted Fri Dec 15 2006 18:14:13 by Res
Canon 30D - Early Problems Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 16:53:40 by Sabena 690