Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejected...any Ideas?  
User currently offlineAtomother From United States of America, joined May 1999, 440 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2425 times:

I haven't had this happen in a good while, a reject!

747 shot from the tower at sunset... Any suggestions?

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=N177UAfrontrange.JPG

and the rejection reason follows:
These photos appear to have been either overexposed (too bright) or
underexposed (too dark). This could be a scanning problem or a
problem with the original photos. Check your original photo, if
it appears to be correctly exposed then please change the settings
on your scanner or use a photo manipulating tool to adjust the brightness
of the photos. If the photo is a digital shot then you will probably be
unable to improve the shot to an acceptable standard.
If you think you have been able to improve the quality of the photos, please

re-upload them. Note that we are still very interested in having these
photos in our database, we only ask that you try to improve the quality
of the digital version of your photos.

Tim Samples

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2390 times:

I like it Tim, it just may be a bit too "vast" for them. I personally can't see any exposure issues, but then I'm just a mere mortal.

By the way, you are one of the major reasons I bought a Canon Digital Rebel - I saw what you do with yours at DEN (and all over the world, for that matter), and decided it was time to put away my 4.1 megapixel point-and-shoot, and go hang with the BIG dogs! Your shots are amazing, keep up the great work. Thanks for inspiring us Tim!

DREW



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2373 times:

Tim,

Nice shot. I think if you can lighten the fuselage a little it will make it in. How do I get a vistor's pass to come visit you?

v/r
Jeff


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2363 times:

Tim

If it's any comfort, that photo now resides on my computer, as my desktop background. As Andrew said above, you are also one of the main reasons I am looking into the Digital Rebel. Also, thanks for giving me the dirt on shooting at Denver back in January. Your e-mail helped me out alot.

DLKAPA


User currently offlineAtomother From United States of America, joined May 1999, 440 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Thanks for the replies and generous comments guys...

Jeff, if you can get out here tonight and into the A-concourse somehow, I can get you up for a tour of the tower tonight. I am actually here at work till 03:30 tonight. From about midnight on I could use someone to keep me awake!

Also, how do I make the aircraft brighter without changing the rest of the photo? I will play around with it a bit more tomorrow, I just thought the rejection reason was a bit vague as to being "too bright or too dark" which is it?

Thanks again, Tim Samples


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2344 times:

Tim,
nice shot. Also, thanks for all the tips you have given me.

 Big thumbs up


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2329 times:

Thanks for the tour offer, but I can't get to concourse A legally..  Big grin

Try "dodging" the midtones of the fuselage to lighten it some.


User currently offlineAn-225 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 3950 posts, RR: 40
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2316 times:

Whoa, Tim is taking visitors to that tower? Tim, name the beer of your choice Big grin.

I like the shot, but like Jeff said, lighten up the fuselage, and try again. I've had a few shots I care about rejected, and I am thinking about reworking them. Hope to see you out there again,

Alex.



Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
User currently offlineConcord977 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1261 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2303 times:

Tim,

I like the shot. It looks "moody", which is a good thing.

But to conform to what the reviewers are looking for, I took a couple of minutes to edit the photo myself.

I have no way to host it here - but if you'll send me your email address I will send the photo to you.

- Curt




No info
User currently offlineHisham From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

Tim,
Time to move to Av mode and use exposure compensation! I rarely let the camera decide on exposure for United aircraft; especially when the aircraft is so small in the frame.

Hisham.


User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2276 times:

I've helped you in the past Tim but this time I'll be playing devil's advocate from a screener viewpoint so expect the worst....

-----

If I were to screen 500 shots of the current stuff coming through, then look at your shot, I would ask myself one question before even starting on rejecting for quality related reasons:

"What is the point of interest Tim is trying to capture in this shot?"

I see 100's of Airport Overviews in the queue every week. If quality is perfect, it will tend to come down to content to sway my decision.
* Are there any airport overviews of this airport?
* Does this airport overview contain enough of the airport?
* Are there any features of interest - skyline, large number of aircraft?
* Is there any unusual lighting?

Either something jumps out at you while screening it, or...
* Not enough of the airport - only taxiways
* Only a couple of aircraft (e.g. 4 or 5 - even worse, same airline)
* No skyline - even worse, no buildings at all

To be honest Tim... your airport overview (and I didn't screen it), would have not compared well with the other 100's I screen weekly.

I wouldn't have hestiated in rejecting bad motiv.
--
But before rejecting bad motiv, most of the time, I would have give your shot a once over, to make sure that I covered all problems
(If you don't know the problem - you can't fix it right?)

1. Given this was probably better not being an airport overview, and you submitted information about the aircraft, this leads to "bad distance"
(HINT: Airport overviews are generally not focused on aircraft and hence should be uploaded with airline, aircraft type being "-" and no reg info)

2. Angle - not a rejection commonly used anymore unless it's clear. And on this shot, it's clear

3. Colour - not convinced about colour here. Probably not something I would have rejected for, but given I am playing devil's advocate - I'll mention it

4. Exposure - Hisham made a good point. I would have tried altering levels to increase brightness/contrast on the aircraft.


Certainly not your best shot, and personally one that I wouldn't have expected you to be surprised about.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

What you have there is a beautiful, emotive photograph. It's very 'quiet' - I can just imagine the crisp air, and how the turbines would sound oddly dulled. It may not be what a-net likes in it's aircraft pictures, but that's definitely no reason to be anything other than proud of it.


It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineAtomother From United States of America, joined May 1999, 440 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2239 times:

Jeff, Alex, well its a bit after 3AM here and I am still here in the tower. Tonight would have really been the last night I could have done a tour as it is my last night watching over the hub. No more late nights for me from now on.

As for the photo, Glenn brought up a few points. I suppose it is a "tweener" as not quite an A.net type shot of the aircraft and not really an overview. I probably will not bother uploading it again. I thought it was a good photograph and even though it may have been, it is not a good photograph of the airplane. I never was or will be a "spotter" anyway, I'm more into the aviation photography aspect of it. No big deal, I was just confused by the reason for rejection and was wondering what others thought.

Thanks for all the input guys and I will keep shooting. I think I may have some good stuff from tonight which might be more fun to upload.

Thanks again, Tim Samples


User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

Well Tim, for not being a spotter, you still take some great shots.
You certainly had the idea behind airport overviews when taking these shots:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples



Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Ideas On This? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 08:28:07 by OD720
Any Ideas How I Can Fix This One? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 16:32:34 by N62NA
I Have To Try To Save This One...any Ideas? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 00:21:07 by AIRBUSRIDER
Beaten By Badmotiv Again: Any Ideas? posted Thu Sep 29 2005 02:54:35 by Philthy
Buy 20D + 28-300L In New York, Any Ideas? posted Fri Apr 22 2005 10:10:45 by Liskatze
Canon 75-300 USM Is Problem, Any Ideas? posted Sun Mar 21 2004 14:04:28 by Jkw777
Upgrading My DigiCam- Any Ideas? posted Tue Jul 22 2003 21:31:15 by JBLUA320
Delta Airlines DC-8-71 Rejected...any Help Please? posted Wed Dec 25 2002 08:30:48 by Blackbird1
Latest Rejections- Any Ideas? posted Tue Sep 25 2001 00:30:10 by Airplanenut
Any Opinions On This Rejected Photos posted Sun Sep 3 2006 09:32:37 by AirMalta