Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fast Lenses  
User currently offlineDullesguy From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 247 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

Hey you all i was just wondering b/c the topic keeps on coming up about these fast lenses. What is the real advantage in aviation photography for having those 2.8 70-200 "fast" lenses? does that 2.8 f-stop allow you to use wide apertures in cloudy days while at do able shutter speeds like 1/500 or 1/250? i never really did any photography at the airprots when the wx was bad mainly because i couldnt afford to take trips out to the field w/o taking pics so I havnt really messed around with my 75-300mm f4-5.6 lense in the real cloudy situations to often. i keep hearing that this lense is soft at 5.6 aperture and longer focal lengths like 200mm. It seems that you can still get some real nice shots with these settings in cloudy weather if you keep a steady hand?? maybee im wrong? Is it the sharpness thats another big issue with those L lenses? Maybee I'm just a newbie when it comes to the upper lenses but it seems to me especially with good lighting behind you, and a steady hand you can get some real nice sharp images with a non L lense that will look pretty darn close to those pro lenses. Now that I have a Digi i will make it out to the fields and do more shooting in the cloudy situations to really test it out, but i wanted to just get everyone elses thoughts as well.

well just some thoughts running through my mind



Stephen


"..the joy of the Lord is your strength" Nehemiah 8:10
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

Advantages with fast lenses are that the AF gets a lot of light to work with combined with a short depth of focus, resulting in fast and accurate focusing. You also get more acceptable shutter speeds to work with in bad light.

Staffan


User currently offlineHodges From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 138 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

With more light the lens will be able to autofocus with an extender attached as opposed to lenses like Canon's 70-200mm f/4L which can't autofocus with an extender.

Regards,

Erik



Beer, helping ugly people have sex since 1862.
User currently offlinePilothighflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1595 times:

Where 2.8 comes in handy:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Robert Friedlander


I happen to own one of those "2.8 70-200 "fast" lenses" which is the Nikon 70-200 VR. While I would advise against it you could photograph planes with the lens stepped down to 2.8 to get the higher shutter speeds, but your quality will suffer for it.
I only shoot at 2.8 when conditions prohibit any higher F-stop. For Example when I shot my High School's State final Basketball Game at a local College in their Gym which had poor lighting and I was shooting with out a flash.
You are correct in that you don't need fast $$$ glass to get good pictures, it just makes it easier. Alot of a picture's quality comes from the person behind the camera, not the camera it's self, although these D-SLR help  Big grin

Robert



User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1584 times:

Username: Hodges
From United States, joined Mar 2004, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply: 2
Posted Thu Mar 18 2004 01:18:46 UTC+1 and read 13 times:
With more light the lens will be able to autofocus with an extender attached as opposed to lenses like Canon's 70-200mm f/4L which can't autofocus with an extender.

Regards,

Erik


Wrong there fella. The Canon 70-200mm F/4L still has autofocus with the 1.4x extender.




User currently offlineHodges From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 138 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1567 times:

Sorry, my bad about the whole extender. I'm not really that familiar with Canon glass. Guess I'm more of a Sigma guy. Thanks for the clarification though.

Regards,

Erik



Beer, helping ugly people have sex since 1862.
User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

Couldn't have make these without a fast lens (in this case, a nikon AF 85 f/1.8):

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gordon Ho



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gordon Ho



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gordon Ho




User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1491 times:

As you can see from the remark. And no tripod or monopod used (photo taken handheld).


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jorgos Tsambikakis



-Joge



Bula!
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

And of course the optical quality is usually quite a bit better too than that of slower lenses...

Funds now being accepted towards a 400mm f/2.8 AF-S Nikkor  Laugh out loud



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 744 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1470 times:

And of course the optical quality is usually quite a bit better

Yes, and this is the real difference for me ... the larger diameter lenses required to produce fast glass, and the fact that they are intended for use in situations where the lighting can be difficult (eg. stage lighting), means that the glass and coatings need to be of a very high standard (otherwise that f2.8 aperture is useless).

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 744 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1476 times:

Oh, should also add that fast glass can make a significant difference to AF performance. AF capability is in part determined by the maximum aperture of the lens. For example, my old EOS 3 had 45 AF sensors. Of these, the central 7 operated as cross-type (ie. could look for horizontal or vertical lines) when using lenses f2.8 and faster, but at f4 all except a single central point degrade to hroizontal line sensors, while finally at f8 only the centre point works at all, and that in horizontal mode.

In short, AF systems are likely to be faster and more accurate with fast glass.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tamron VC Lenses - Recommended? posted Thu Oct 9 2008 17:11:12 by 2H4
Prime Lenses posted Mon Sep 29 2008 09:03:02 by Sovietjet
Lenses For D40x posted Mon Aug 25 2008 08:15:40 by FastEddie07
Any Site Suggestions For Buying Used Lenses? posted Wed Jul 30 2008 21:08:02 by Phoenix9
Recommendations: Wide Angle/Fisheye Lenses posted Sun Jul 20 2008 03:59:53 by Flynavy
Fast Screeners! posted Sun Mar 9 2008 03:30:58 by Jetfreak
Soft Lenses? posted Tue Mar 4 2008 12:35:32 by Whappeh
Renting Lenses... posted Sat Mar 1 2008 09:47:57 by Rsmith6621a
Lenses Cheaper In Asia/US posted Sun Feb 17 2008 13:55:15 by EMA747
New Sigma Telephoto Zoom Lenses With OS posted Wed Jan 30 2008 21:20:43 by F14