Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Digital Camera  
User currently offlineAgostinhoMSS From Portugal, joined Mar 2001, 22 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

Hello everybody, this is my first post in this forum.
I have a Nikon F90X with Sigma 70-300DL Macro, Voigtlander 19-35 and Nikkor 50-1.8, and I´m thinking about a digital camera(35-90~) to keep always with me
I would like to see photos taken with digital cameras.
Please send your links.
I also colect 10cm X 15cm aviation photos. Can I get a good 10 X 15 print (or 15 X20) from digital cameras?
My English isn´t 100% but I think its understandable.
Thanks for your time, and good photos.

Agostinho Santos
LPPR


24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCmogens1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1290 times:

Agostinho,
These are some shots I recently took with the Nikon 880. There are some better Digital Cams but for the money it was a pretty good deal. I got mine for $539 US.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Christian Mogensen



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Christian Mogensen



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Christian Mogensen



Christian Mogensen


User currently offlineEDIpic From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

Hi.

I got a Sony DSC-P1 (3.3 Mega Pix) a few weeks ago.
It is very small.
Must admit, haven't had much time to get
used to it yet. I snapped this Airbus on a dull day
at the local airport. I'm happy with it.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Gerry Hill



More to come I hope.

Cheers

Gerry/EDI




User currently offlineGulfstreambrat From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1251 times:

Hey,

I took this one with my Canon G1, 3.34 MP. It's about $900 US


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ed Saldana



User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1244 times:

Hi!
All of mine are digital. I have a Nikon Coolpix 990 and the teleconverters.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Peter Unmuth


Peter



-
User currently offlineAndyhunt From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1306 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1225 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I have just switched to digital (Fuji Finepix S1 Pro.) I'm having A LOT of fun. Some samples:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



Adds a whole new dimension to the hobby.

Andrew



Full frame always beats post processing
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1214 times:

Andy,

Take it back their rubbish!!

So not only do you have excellant weather, excellant shooting positions and an excellant array of aircraft your now going to spoil us with even more great shots, its not fair move to the England where It rains every day!

My last S1 shot:
Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Paul Dopson


How are you finding the S1?

Regards

Paul


User currently offlineAndyhunt From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1306 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1203 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Paul,

Strange, your shot has more hits than mine!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

I am having a ball playing around with the S1. I kept going into the local pro camera shot and staring at the body (should have been arrested for stalking the camera body) until one of the sales reps spotted me, grabbed the S1, put in some batteries and let me "play". I bought the darn thing in about 5 minutes!!!

Also want to say a big public thank you to you for giving me all that advice on the camera and taking the time to let me know your experiences. Although I may rescind that Thank You once I get my VisaCard Bill!

You are right, the 1:1.5 aspect does take some getting used to, especially if like me you are shooting still SLR. But once you do get used to it, bang, let the fun begin.

I like it because I can burn shots of anything without worrying, if it is no good, then just delete and shoot again. I"m now shooting angles and positions I never would have bothered with in the past. Example:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



The only little problem I have noticed is that the CCD is very senstive to dust and little minute particles. You have to constantly clean the CCD with a blast from compressed air. One shoot I had a big black dot in the left hand side of each and every shot, which had to be airbrshed out of the final scan.

How are you finding it?

Andrew



Full frame always beats post processing
User currently offlineAgostinhoMSS From Portugal, joined Mar 2001, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

Hi,

thanks for all the wonderfull digital photos.
One of the things I like about digital, is that you don´t have to worry about dust in the negatives and slides.

The other question I post yestarday, was about prints.
Did you ever print one of this photos (postcard size) ?
Does it look like a normal print from SLR´s ?
Once again thank you.

Agostinho Santos


User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 851 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

I'm REALLY picky about digital imaging, so it takes alot to impress me. So, as an experiment, I took some images from my 3mp camera and uploded them to ezprints.com.

Those prints I got back looked (and felt) like real, honest to god 35mm prints. I was really impressed. However, go any bigger than that with your 3mp camera, and I've heard that you can start to tell that it's a digital print. I haven't tried this though.

If my little pro-sumer 3mp digcam makes me happy, I'll bet my head would explode after 10 minutes of playing with a D1x...  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



User currently offlineBrownphoto From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 151 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1174 times:

i recently purchased a D1, and here are the first three A-net shots i got with it.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Joe Brown


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Joe Brown


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Joe Brown



I have printed these out to 8x10, and you cannot thell the differnece between them and traditional film prints!

Hope this helps.

Joe Brown



User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1153 times:

Andy,

Im glad I was of help to you and yes I know exactly how you feel with the credit card bill!!

Your right about the CCD liking dust and crap, so far thats the only negative thing I have to say about the camera. Your also right about not having to worry about how many shots you take and that if you dont like one you can just delete it, I dont think I have ever taken so many shots in one vist to an airport as I do now.

I cant wait to see what you come up with next.

Regards

Paul


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Hi!
I did some prints on the size of 25 * 37 cm and they came out very well from the lab. I coulnd't tell the difference to analog prints, and nobody else could until now.
Peter



-
User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1133 times:

I just picked up a Fuji S1 have played around with it a bit and the results are beyond excellent, except for a small problem at 1600ISO in low light conditions.

Apart from that, no problems. I know somebody that printed a 16x20 inch print from it and it was as comparable to a print from an analog 6x7 cm Negative.

Obviously this was at it's best resolution.

cheers

Glenn Alderton


User currently offlineUsairways@clt From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 209 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1121 times:

$4000???...are there any digital cameras maybe 1 grand or less that have image quality like the S1? I must say, I am very impressed with the pics here!

Zach


User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 47
Reply 15, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1124 times:

You can buy the S1 for USD 2800.00 at B&H.

http://www02.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph/FrameWork.class?FNC=ProductActivator__Aproductlist_html___220434___FUFPS1K___REG___CatID=1082___SID=E5F1FABBC20

Vasco

If I had a little too much of it, I would buy the S1, a 1.4 teleconverter and the Sigma 500 f4.5



User currently offlineUsairways@clt From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 209 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1114 times:

Thanks Vasco, I also just found it on ebay for $1500.

Does anyone know how the S1 compares to the D1?

Thanks,
Zach


User currently offlineAndyhunt From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1306 posts, RR: 52
Reply 17, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1125 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Glenn,

You mean you joined the club and got an S1? Well done, fantastic pieice of machinery, isn't it?

Vasco: You wouldn't need the 1.4X converter as the conversion to digital would give you a 1:1.5 aspect ratio, and leave you looking at 750mm!

Andrew



Full frame always beats post processing
User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 47
Reply 18, posted (13 years 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1118 times:

Andrew,

I know but I want to go further than the 750mm, after
I kind of missed that moon shot (500mm are still not good enough, 1000mm would have given me a more satisfying result.

We'll see what the future brings.

Vasco


User currently offlineBrownphoto From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 151 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (13 years 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1096 times:

Hello All - Great thread!

As far as the D1 vs S1 part of this discussion goes, I can only say, go to your local camera store and try them both out.

The D1, is a heavy pro camera based on the Nikon F5 body. It has every setting and adjustment and a wide range of ISO settings. It also has it's share of problems - dark channel noise at higher ISO's etc... but this can be worked around.

The S1, is based on the Nikon 6006, which, is not being made anymore. I therefore question how long the support from Nikon to Fuji will be. Will parts be available in the future? I cannot answer that.

I do feel, IMHO, that the S1 is a decent camera for the money, and is worthy of consideration, but I do question it as a "pro" camera.

I have handled both camera's and in the end I went with the D1, because I previously had a lot of Nikon equipment, and felt it was the best choice for me.

And ultimately, no matter how much information you have, the choice will be yours and no one elses.

Joe Brown


User currently offlineMilt From Netherlands, joined Jul 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (13 years 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1088 times:

The D1 is in another league as the Fuji S1. They are aimed at different markets and that's clear from the features.

I own a D1 because I need it's speed, features and build quality. But purely based on image quality, I would prefer the Fuji S1. Unforntunately, it's build around a Nikon F60 which is too slow and doesn't support AF-S lenses.

I think the Fuji S1 compares well with the Canon D30 although the latter has a little more features. If you don't need superior build quality, high speed operation and AF-S support, go the for Fuji S1.

Grtz,
Marco


User currently offlineCabbott From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 497 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (13 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

Guys

All my shots bar around 30 are Digital Taken on Airliners.net.

Digital Is Great. 2 Types of Digital Camera around just now. Those under a grand and those above a grand in price.

I think I have a great set-up.

I use the Sony DSC-S70 3.3mp Digital Camera. I also have the Olympus B-300 1X7 Teleconvertor and the camera fills all my needs. Been to LAX, Vegas etc etc and the lens size fine.The picture quality is Superb full screen.

Anyway, Digital is cheap in the longrun if you find the combination that works well for you.

Do you think the quality match those professional 2 thousand + cameras then?


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin Abbott



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin Abbott



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin abbott



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin Abbott




User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (13 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

Following this up I have to agree with Joe, Marco and Colin!

The S1 is probably not a digital SLR that a true professional would choose. I would position it between the normal digital cameras and the top end professional cameras. For me its perfect I dont have ramp access like Colin does (I think) or can get close enough to the action unless its when im at Lasham. But if you can get cloes enough to the actiion then a normal digital cam will give you just as good shots.

So for me a normal digital camera wouldnt have been able to do it for me. The S1 gives me much more flexibility and with the 170-500 Sigma bolted on, gives some stunning take off shots from Gatwick when I stand in my tree!! Shot some yesterday which are in the queue, nice Delta MD-11 shots  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Regards

Paul


User currently offlineDsmav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 23, posted (13 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1082 times:

Having used both the D1 and the S1, I found that they both VERY good cameras. The D1 was a breeze for me to adapt to, since it is based on the Nikon F5 body. Everything about the camera impressed me, except one thing, image quality. I did not find the image quality as good as the S1, which somewhat surprised me. There seemed to be a lot of magenta casting in most photos, especially in white objects such as clouds. It also does a horrible job on portraits.

The S1 was a very pleasant surprise. Aside from its questionable build quality and being based on a pretty mediocre camera body such as the N60, the results I got were fantastic. The photos were as good if not better than most Provia and Velvia scans I have seen. I was not impressed with the AF speed, but I still had no trouble getting action shots with it. I have very few gripes for this camera, maybe the low price has something to do with it.  Smile

Overall, I do not see a reason to (unless you are really rough on your equipment) to choose a D1 over an S1... You get better image quality at a lower price, seems like an obvious choice to me. However, things may change once the D1X hits the market, but even then, at $5000, can this camera really be considered a bargain?

Aric Thalman
Omaha, NE



To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineAndyhunt From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1306 posts, RR: 52
Reply 24, posted (13 years 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1077 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I had a look at both and found the D1 and S1 to be both excellent machines. I went for the S1 because:

1) Cost
2) Cost!
3) Cost!!

The image quality on both were excellent. As Paul has mentioned, it is perfect for an enthusiast / semi pro who does not have ramp access. Get's you close to the action. For example:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



and


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt



Andrew



Full frame always beats post processing
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Choosing The Right Ultrazoom Digital Camera... posted Sun Feb 11 2007 14:16:28 by Thom@s
Digital Camera Help! posted Mon Jan 30 2006 17:02:58 by Pipo777
Need Expert Advice On 5MP Digital Camera posted Wed Nov 2 2005 17:39:57 by YV136C
Canon Rebel XT 8MP Digital Camera $660 posted Sun Sep 4 2005 06:32:34 by Clickhappy
A Very Unhappy Bo: My Digital Camera Is Broken. :( posted Thu Jul 14 2005 08:58:11 by BO__einG
For Dutch People That Want A Cheap Digital Camera! posted Fri Jun 10 2005 21:23:57 by Sfilipowicz
Using A Small Digital Camera? Is It Good Enough? posted Sun Jun 5 2005 20:59:06 by An225
Advice/Help: What Digital Camera Should I Buy? posted Mon Apr 18 2005 21:02:08 by SignalOne
"soft" Photos With Digital Camera posted Tue Mar 15 2005 04:27:16 by ZKEOJ
The FujiFilm FinePix S5500 Zoom Digital Camera. posted Fri Feb 18 2005 21:26:07 by AirbusA346