Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Screening Hapiness:-)  
User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
Posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2042 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

All

After the recent "long queue" thread (with all its negativity), I want to start a new positive thread where we can all share in some screening successes and enjoy airliners.net. I beg that nobody turns this around into a negative mood!

My example is this one. Simon Curtis recently got his first photo accepted, and it's already very popular and a photo he can be extremely proud of. When Simon first submitted the shot, it was rejected for "badgrainy". Simon reworked the shot and resubmitted it and has a brilliant result. As a screener, it makes me very happy because we are all winners:

  • Simon's respect is higher because his accepted photo is much higher quality;

  • The screeners are happy because their screening advice was taken seriously;

  • airliners.net is a winner because they get a fantastic shot in their database;

  • Our visitors are happy because they get to see a wonderful photo.


  • Please compare the rejected image:
    http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=SQ-747-400-9VSPL-31032004-SJC.jpg
    with the (re-worked) accepted image:

    View Large View Medium

    Photo © Simon Curtis


    Fot your information, Simon and I discussed this post, and he is happy to share the rejected image to illustrate the positive side of screening.

    I'd love to see some other examples of where you think the screening process has helped you, or the site, to be better.

    Now, keep it positive!

    Tamsin

    [Edited 2004-04-06 13:31:49]


    TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
    32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
     
    User currently offlineBigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 54
    Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2012 times:

    Simon completely dominated on that shot. Good work and nice to see the screening process working well.  Smile

    Good job all around!

    -Phil



    Phil Derner Jr.
    User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 48
    Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1993 times:

    The following shot was rejected before... But on the rejection, the screener (I don't who) encouraged me to work on it a bit more, as (s)he said it could be very popular shot in the database. I reworked it and yes, it came out much better.

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Eduard Brantjes



    Of course I was a bit bummed with the rejection at first, but of course, the screeners managed to see more potential for improvement. Thank you screeners!
     Big thumbs up
    Eduard


    User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5576 posts, RR: 63
    Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1977 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Hi all

    Nice thread starter by fellow screener Tamsin.

    With the hundreds of rejections per week, it would be great to comment on them all rather than send the standard rejection message. This will not happen and probably never will.

    Personally, if I feel an image is really nice but needs a tiny amount of re-work, I will comment to the photographer. As Tasmin says, if those comments are taken on board by the photographer, he/she re-works the image for the better, everyone is happy.

    Cheers

    Gary


    User currently offlineAPT From Germany, joined Feb 2004, 65 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1968 times:

    Hello,
    well there's this one photo which I posted quite often but just fits this topic so well that I'm going to post it again:

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Alex Peter


    It was first rejected for badcameraangle. I reworked it because I thought this is one photo that has to be shared and the reworked version got accepted. Plus it is the first and only photo I have sold so far.  Laugh out loud

    Cheers
    Alex


    User currently offlineMerC From Sweden, joined Dec 2003, 590 posts, RR: 2
    Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1964 times:

    Hi !

    I edited some photos a couple of days ago, and I uploaded this one:

    http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=040402_GOT_D-ABIY.jpg

    It got rejected for badscan.

    A little later I gave it another shot and reworked the whole photo. I worked a lot with the USM tool. Which payed me off.


    View Large View Medium

    Photo © Marcus Johnson



    I can clearly see the difference between the two of them.

    Last night I worked with another photo, it got rejected for baddark. Gave that one also another shot, this time working more with "Curves". When I woke up this morning it had been accepted. Great surprise for me.  Smile


    Regards,

    MerC


    PS. the link above screwed up when I used these, "<" ">".

    [Edited 2004-04-06 14:05:09]

    [Edited 2004-04-06 14:05:24]


    It's Scandinavian
    User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
    Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1954 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Tip: You sometimes need to go in and edit your post (after posting) to make the "<" ">" links work to the rejected images.

    Tamsin



    TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
    User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
    Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1934 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Yes it's always nice to see people are actually paying attention to why their photo was rejected. If everyone was like that the queue would go much much faster.

    I also had a rejection a while ago
    http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=IMG365phbfp.jpg

    Was rejected for badcolor and the screener was 100% correct. I reworked and voila
    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Tim de Groot



    Clearly the system works. Of course some shots can't be salvaged, but instead of moaning about it or constantly reuploading them, invest your time in improving your photo skills, or work more hours and buy a better camera Big grin

    Tim



    Alderman Exit
    User currently offline747 4-ever From Sweden, joined Feb 2001, 604 posts, RR: 18
    Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

    I got this photo rejected for badmotiv, then I cloned away some of the distracting snowflakes in the foreground. Then it got accepted and is now my most popular photo Big grin
    http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=SAS_A330_SE-REF_3.jpg

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Daniel & Robert Fall



    Regards,
    Robert


    User currently offlineEGBB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

    Very interesting thread but I do wonder how much comes down to either the photographers or screeners personal eye/preferences in what looks correct? Many of my recent uploads were rejected for badsoft saying they needed an extra kick which I have done on the example below but to me it is way over sharpened - but if this is what is required and deemed correct I will have no choice but to sharpen at this level in future - it would be interesting to hear the screeners views on this before I submit my next batch

    Many thanks

    Derek

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Derek Pedley - AirTeamImages



    User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
    Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1775 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Derek

    I tend to agree that areas of that shot look oversharpened to me (but I haven't seen the rejected one so I can't comment on your rejection). I think one thing which catches out a lot of people is the requirement for "selective" sharpening. Often an image will be perfect in places, but soft in other places. As a screener, I see this time and time again on titles - often the titles are jaggy whilst the fuselage, windows, etc are soft. If this is the case, then the shot will often get a "badsoft" reject. When I'm having a good day, I try to add a "badpersonal" to point out which bits need sharpening more. Although having said that, I would expect that photographer should be able to tell that for themselves. Personally, I never apply the same sharpening settings to the entire image - usually apply a conservative sharpening to everything, then start to select areas and sharpen a little at a time. Low-contrast areas need more sharpening than high-contrast areas. That works for me, I rarely get "badsoft" or "badjaggy" rejections since I started doing it in this selective way.

    Good question Derek, but I hope we don't go off too far on this "sharpening" tangent, and can keep hearing people's sucess stories.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

    Tamsin



    TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
    User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
    Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1755 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Derek, I could be wrong but your shot looks a little blurry to begin with.

    Tim



    Alderman Exit
    User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5576 posts, RR: 63
    Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1736 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Hi all

    Derek, sorry, but have to agree with Tim on the Aer Lingus shot.

    Blurry to begin with and having my screeners hat on, would have rejected for this reason.

    Regards

    Gary


    User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1717 times:

    The EI 737 shot almost appears to have been heavily cropped (?)

    Derek will kill me if it hasnt Big grin but thats how it appears to me looking at its quality and particulaly the sky in comparison with Dereks other silky smooth images.

    Cheers

    Ben Pritchard


    User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
    Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1690 times:

    I like your attitude Tamsin. Keep up the good work.


    Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
    User currently offlineUTA_flyingHIGH From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 50
    Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1654 times:

    Hello all,
    As you probably have observed lately, I have had some differences in opinion with some screeners.
    But as Tamsin rightly points out, it's time to move ahead, forget past mistakes and concentrate on positive aspects.
    The new screeners have been very good in my opinion in the sense that they regularly take the time to use the "badpersonal" message to help fellow photographers and making them better.
    Not being on my computer right now, I can't show you the rejection, but I reworked the shot and here it is (amongst other accepted reworks) :

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © William Ronciere


    I am currently working on my LHR W/E shots and I will take into account what has been said on these forums and the personal rejection messages I got.
    With positive thinking on both sides everyone will be a winner in the end.

    UTA






    Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
    User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

    "it's time to move ahead, forget past mistakes and concentrate on positive aspects"

    Very 'New' Labour

    Ben Pritchard


    User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
    Reply 17, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1630 times:

    I'd like to join in and say thanks to all of the screeners. While rejections can get discouraging at times, each rejected photo shows us a glimpse of what NOT to do. There is always a reason, and if we learn from it, our acceptance stats will go WAY up (too bad we can't track it, but anyway).

    I must admit, when I dropped $2,000 on a Canon Digital Rebel, lenses and everything to go with it, I was VERY disgusted to have my first batch of uploads rejected. Not even one made it into the database. That was two months ago.

    As the screener's standards went up - so did mine. Looking back at the rubbish I uploaded just makes me laugh - I feel I owe the screeners an apology for wasting their time by making them screen grainy, dark, soft photos. But again - I learned from it. Have a look at one of my disasters:
    http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=AUBERN752ATATL1.jpg
    UGH. What the HELL was I thinking. Insane

    Anyway, times have changed. I've figured out my camera. I've learned post processing. And most importantly - I am starting to learn what the screeners want to see. Last week I uploaded a batch of 24 shots, and 23 were accepted. The one that was rejected had a corner of a tug in the frame, I knew I should have removed it!!! I was thrilled to see 23 photos added.

    Thanks to everyone who has helped me out over the past year or so... Johan, the screeners, Maizinblu757, Tim Samples... the list goes on and on. Without the help of the Photography Forum and the good folks on this site, I'd still have no photos in the d/b.  Smokin cool


    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Freight-Dawg




    I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
    User currently offlineEGBB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 18, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

    I have had major problems with my PC this last 24 hours (excuse excuses) so maybe it was me yesterday but I know looking at the EI 737 image I am not happy with it, so I intend to do it again and re upload and see if I can get it to look how I know it should

    All the best

    Derek





    User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
    Reply 19, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

    This one was rejected badsoft at first:


    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Wietse de Graaf - AirTeamImages



    http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=184_8444.jpg

    And this one was badangle:


    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Wietse de Graaf - AirTeamImages



    http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=190_9053.jpg

    Thanks to the screeners they were corrected and accepted.



    Wietse de Graaf
    User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
    Reply 20, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

    Wietse - AWESOME photos!!!


    I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
    User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
    Reply 21, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1594 times:

    Thanks F-D  Smile

    W



    Wietse de Graaf
    User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5066 posts, RR: 15
    Reply 22, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

    A little editing goes a long way..........

    all i can say is that my rate for acceptance went up when i learned good editing techniques including color adjustment. I even got an older photo accepted which was not digital.

    The new photographers can definitely get frustrated trying to get their first shot(s) on the database though.

    bruce



    Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
    User currently offlineTristar501 From Austria, joined Feb 2004, 92 posts, RR: 1
    Reply 23, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

    I got this one rejected twice for badscan, but after some work it got accepted. It's really one of my favourite shoots!


    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Andreas Müller



    Andreas  Smile



    I don't re-upload ...
    User currently offlineStefan From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 40 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 24, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1352 times:

    this thread encouraged me to look through my rejections and to fix some of the pics which seemd basicly ok, but had "badangle", "badsize", etc.. - things, that could be fixed fairly easy.

    just reuploaded them and hopefully they will meet the standards of a.net  Smile

    regards

    stefan


    25 Benyhone : Just out of curiosity, how often do you screeners write a message back to the photog telling them how to fix it? I've never received such a reply. Whe
    26 Post contains images TZ : It is quite rare for screeners to enter comments, simply due to the pressures of time. We have so many pictures to screen, if we added personal commen
    27 Skymonster : Just to add to what Tamsin said, we really do not have time to add personal comments to all rejections - in fact, out of several hundred pictures I sc
    28 Post contains images Granite : Hi all Screening happiness is...........pulling up a new screening page WITHOUT any BA A319's Only kidding, I have some to process........just think,
    29 Post contains images Sukhoi : Screening hapiness is not having 100 or so shots by the same photog from the same location with the same style of shot.............. Screening hapines
    30 Granite : Hi all Screening happiness is.........not getting any of Paul's stuff in a batch. I really hate having to reject his stuff......but a man's gotta do w
    31 Sukhoi : Or not getting another BA 757 from one of those tiny airports across the border! Cheers Paul
    32 Post contains images Granite : Hi Paul I know you love 'em. Cheers Gary
    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    MP 744 Freighter Priority Screening? posted Sun Nov 26 2006 09:29:43 by AirKas1
    Pre-screen Screening Help posted Thu Nov 23 2006 13:36:03 by Brett
    Pre Screening Help posted Tue Nov 21 2006 02:48:17 by JetJock22
    Question About Priority Screening posted Sun Nov 19 2006 06:37:48 by XAAPB
    Pre-screening Opinions Please (Airport Overview) posted Sun Nov 12 2006 04:06:04 by AviatorG
    Why Have A First Screening? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 19:09:29 by PilotNTrng
    Pre-Screening Advice posted Fri Nov 10 2006 05:12:08 by ANITIX87
    Screening Queue Is Rising Again.... posted Wed Oct 18 2006 17:16:18 by LIPH
    Another Pre-screening Thread.. posted Sun Oct 15 2006 20:28:43 by SA006
    Pre-screening Advice posted Sun Oct 15 2006 00:04:45 by Avro85