Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Schmejection  
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

In light of the recent post ranting on about frivolous uploads, and the such, I do feel a bit guilty.

A bit.  Wink/being sarcastic


Anywho, BadPeople for both. The first one, well, fine, my dad is kind of right up and taking up a lot of the frame. The second one though...

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=P9200042.1.jpg

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=P9200049_filtered_baf.jpg


What the FUTT?
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1511 times:

I like the second one, gives you an idea of how big the plane is. As well as getting in the tail..  Big thumbs up

Tom


User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1459 times:

They were both clearly rejected for BadFutt. Big grin

The first one, as you said, is a no-brainer...

The second one...well, I like it, but I can see why it would have been rejected too. You should know better than to try to upload something a little out of the "ordinary" to this site. Big grin


User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

Please, please, don't upload photos like the first one.

Luis


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

OK, so screw the first one.

For the tail/dad comparison, though, do you think It's worth an appeal? It was rejected (this time) only for BadPeople, but I have permission (duh) and my dad isn't obstructing any part of the plane...



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineBigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4076 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1406 times:

Why does he look like he's trying to flex? That's my job. lol

I jsut don't think any of those shots are visually pleasing. There's no artistic or aesthetically pleasing qualities to it.

BadBuckFutt for sure.  Big grin

-Phil



Phil Derner Jr.
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

Futt -

I think the second shot is not worth appealing. It's the kind of thing you can stick in a photo album and look back on in twenty years with your dad and say "Hey...Remember when we went to LGA and you stood under the Stupid-80?" However, I agree with Phil that it's probably not the kind of thing a.net will accept. But the appeal function exists for a reason, so use it if you want to. Who cares what other people think, anyways, right?

Or go to the competition if you really are gung-ho about displaying the photo...  Smile

Josh


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1351 times:

Yes I agree, motive doesn't work.. Plus you cut off the vertical stabilizer.

User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

I think the motivation is there 110% in the comparision shot. I know I never thought an MD80 was this big...it puts everything in perspective (blah blah).

And, EDDG...I KNOW the vertical stabilizer is cut off.  Laugh out loud



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1340 times:

"I think the motivation is there 110% in the comparision shot. "

Then appeal the rejection!


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1322 times:

I think the motivation is there 110% in the comparision shot. I

Once again, IN YOUR OPINION. Obviously, if you uploaded the shot you think it has some merit and that it should be accepted. However, these are the reasons why these shots got rejected, and if you keep uploading them you will keep getting rejections. The screeners obviously disagree and have thus rejected it. Johans site, not yours.


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

I, like many other people I'm sure, upload two kinds of photos. Those we are adament about, and feel deserve to be on the site, and those petty side-ons that if they're rejected, "oh well."

This is one of the former. It's out of the norm, and unfortunately, like Jakbar said, I "should know better than to try to upload something a little out of the "ordinary" to this site." Putting a person in the frame adds another element to the photo, something you can compare it to. Size...this perfectly displays it.

I appealed, and we shall see what happens. If it's BadPeople, tough...I can't fix it. BadMotive, maybe I can do something.


Johans site, not yours.

And it's my photo. I'll fight for an acceptance until I feel it's not worth it anymore.



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

Yes its your photo,

But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter whether you think its motive enough, or whether having someone in the frame adds another element to the photo, a comparison.

To me, as an unbiased viewer of the site, it means nothing to me. I wouldn't open the photo as there is nothing to bring to my attention in the photo. There are hundreds of photos on the site that offer a size comparison, without being an unmotivated closeup with the vertical stabilizer being chopped off ( Big grin), and thats most likely why it got rejected. As it doesn't show the whole of the aircraft, and there was no real motivation for the tail closeup, I don't think you'll have much luck with the appeal.

However, i'm sure Johan or the screener may now add the photo just to spite me  Big grin


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1300 times:

I think it looks good with the comparison. Futt, if you want this in the db, appeal. But don't make it hell on the screaners to have to open up that image every day when you go to re-upload.

Getting your point across is one thing, but don't tire it out.

DLKAPA


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1292 times:

EGGD: OK, you got me. You put up quite an argument, and I like that. You may become a respected user... Wink/being sarcastic On another note, it was not made clear to me that it was rejected for the cut off control surface, as BadPeople does not encompass aircraft parts (directly). Although I do agree that Johan will reject it for the 'chop' rather than my dad, if at all.

DLKAPA: Thanks. I appealed, but I don't intend on reuploading it unless I can make some sort of dramatic improvement. I'm going on and on and on about it in this thread, and I'm not going to take it out on the upload queue. But, I'm a firm believer that if I don't agree with the specified rejection reason (in this case, BadPeople, NOT BadMotive for the horizontal stabilizer), I'll appeal or make a thread about it. And here I am.


However, i'm sure Johan or the screener may now add the photo just to spite me  Big grin
I've probably given him a few ideas as well...

[Edited 2004-04-07 03:13:33]


What the FUTT?
User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1285 times:

Bah... I can't see the 2nd one. Deleted...  Sad


Yay Pudding!
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1280 times:

Hey futt! Clone him out!

*I cloned out a truck, and a plane and a sky and my dad out of the photo*

HAHA



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1272 times:

Go3Team: The link changed because It's now in the appeal queue. It can now be found here: http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=APPEAL_P9200049_filtered_baf.jpg&appealed=yes.

Vitaly: That prettymuch defeats the whole purpose. I was thinking about something more along the lines of cloning something INTO the shot, but you didn't hear that from me.  Acting devilish



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1269 times:

Is it possible to clone something 'into' a shot?

User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1266 times:

DLKAPA: Absolutely. You can take it from another photo, or even another part of the same photo. Just set the target where you want it (again, either the same or a different photo), and clone away! Easy as pie. PIE I CAN'T HAVE DURING PASSOVER!  Angry lol


What the FUTT?
User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1247 times:

A rushed clone, and I think Futterman knows the guy too...



Yay Pudding!
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1238 times:

I give up. Who is it  Confused



User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 44
Reply 22, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1238 times:

LOL

Hey, I didn't meet Josh Akbar for another 21 days!



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1226 times:

Whoa...I've been cloned. Cool!

User currently offlineAn-225 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 3950 posts, RR: 40
Reply 24, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1195 times:

Futterman,

I honestly don't think that it's exactly airliners.net material. It's not a BAD shot, but it's just not a.net material. I KNOW you can do better.  Big grin. Message me privately if you want to discuss it. Get my sn from Vafi88  Big grin

Alex.



Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"Dark" Rejection - What To Do? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 02:07:33 by Walter2222
Help With A Level Rejection posted Thu Dec 7 2006 22:35:45 by Lnglive1011yyz
Some Rejection Input, Please posted Wed Dec 6 2006 04:12:14 by Futterman
Rejection/Motiv Question posted Tue Dec 5 2006 23:56:10 by Vzlet
Looking For Help Concerning 'soft' Rejection posted Tue Dec 5 2006 19:23:01 by Maiznblu_757
Centring Rejection Feedback posted Tue Dec 5 2006 00:35:20 by Aussie18
Blurry Rejection Help Please posted Mon Dec 4 2006 18:19:13 by Kukkudrill
"Double" Rejection posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:47:14 by Ander
Motive Rejection..clarification Please? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 14:40:46 by BrianW999
Help On Cockpit Shot Rejection .. posted Tue Nov 28 2006 09:07:21 by Guido