Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lens Protection-UV Or Skylight Filter  
User currently offlineUa935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2934 times:

Hello,

I have just purchased a Canon EOS 300D and Sigma 70-200 F2.8 EX HSM.

Do any of you out there use either a UV or Skylight filter for lens protection?

Any assistance/advice would be appreciated.

Regards Simon.


Live every second like you mean it
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStefan From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2910 times:

i´m using a skylight for both my lenses (28-105, 200-400). good way to protect lenses, as you wrote.

regards stefan


User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2904 times:

For sure!

Your lens has 77mm filter size. That big filters may seem expensive (50-70 euros), but buying a new filter is always cheaper than buying a new lens (in case you hit the front part). I would also consider about getting a multi-coated filter (like Hoya HMC).

-Joge



Bula!
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2899 times:

aloha,

I am using UV- Filters on all my lenses for protection, I think does change less the picture, than skylight filter .....

robin



ABC
User currently offlineBowen0614 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2001, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 2841 times:

I am using HOYA UV[0] for the protection.
It seems that the UV filter does not change the picture much, just for protection.

Bowen


User currently offlineSkymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 2837 times:

Both do relatively little to affect the image and I view either/both as more critical to the protection of the front element of the lens than to what they do for the resulting pictures. Whilst I am sure that there are indeed differences that the likes of Colin Work could explain, I'd not turn my nose up at either one if the other were not available.

Andy


User currently offlineMELflyer From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 9 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2825 times:

I to use UV filters on my lenses. The protection offered while shooting through fences is invaluable, especially with all the knocks. Far cheaper to replace the filter than the lense, although i have noticed the prices of Hoya filters creeping up, so may have to be more careful.  Smile

Cheers


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 740 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2826 times:

I (and it seems from the photo sites) others have swung back and forth on the filter issue over the years. On the one hand, yes, they do offer some lens protection. On the other hand, its another piece of glass which may potentially reduce image quality - unless the filter is of the highest quality and multicoated it may result in slightly less contrast and increase the potential for flare.

My personal position at the moment is to go filter free (most of the time) - in all the years I have used filters I've not noticed any scratches or other damage which might have been inflicted on the lens. I do always use a lenshood though which I think provides more effective protection. Perhaps I have just been lucky, but having made a significant investment in high quality L glass, I am very reluctant to put anything else between the lens and the subject. One exception is that I try to remember to use one if shooting by the sea - I'm not keen on cleaning salt spray off the lens!

In terms of photographic benefit, technically the UV filter can help reduce
that bluish haze you see in distant landscapes, though the effect is subtle
and really only noticable under certain conditions (mid-day sun shots). Could help a bit with contrail shots.

The skylight adds a slight warming effect to your shots which partially counteracts the blue-ish shadows which occur in high sun situations.

This sort of very subtle filtration is important primarily for slide shooters. For print shooters, any effect will be negated by the processing lab (or more correctly, over-ridden by the machine exposure/colour compensation). For digital shooters, the effect of the filter is easily (and more precisely) replicated in Photoshop.

Cheers.

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Basic Filter Preference-UV Or Skylight? posted Sat Jan 27 2001 20:42:45 by Bodobodo
Lens Advice: Is Or Not? posted Thu May 11 2006 01:41:50 by AC773
UV Vs Skylight For L Lenses posted Thu Feb 23 2006 10:51:29 by PhotoLPPT
Changing My Canon L Lens...any Thoughts Or Help? posted Fri Jan 20 2006 18:53:49 by Danpio
Sigma Lens 28-300mm Or Nikkor 70-300mm? posted Sun Jul 31 2005 19:54:43 by Airline7322
Looking For A New Lens..28-300.. Or What? posted Wed Jun 8 2005 23:01:37 by GRZ-AIR
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan
UV- Or Skylightfilter? posted Sat Feb 24 2001 10:15:23 by Zander
UV Filter = Lens Flare? posted Sat May 29 2004 04:19:03 by Xenon
UV Filter posted Tue Oct 3 2006 22:34:22 by Singel09