Sulman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1893 times:
The image actually sharpens very nicely, but I'm not skilled enough in PS to get the colours to balance. There are some artifacts around the titles (the ink looks like it has run a little) but these go with a bit of gentle USM and hand - editing.
MerC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1829 times:
Instead of starting a new topic I will take it here.
I just had another photo rejected. That photo has been rejected about three times now, but with different reasons. I am puzzled. The two first rejections were badcameraangle, that I agree with. Had a hard time getting this one straight. But now, the last time, it got rejected for badexposure.
In the previous rejections there were no mentioning about badexposure. The photos are practically identical IMO.
I get pretty confused with different rejection reasons for practically the same photo. Now I have no clue what do to with it. Could it have been cause of different screeners, that would be pretty logic?
Here they are, take a look if you want and toss some advice my way.