Sulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2222 times:
The image actually sharpens very nicely, but I'm not skilled enough in PS to get the colours to balance. There are some artifacts around the titles (the ink looks like it has run a little) but these go with a bit of gentle USM and hand - editing.
It's a lovely little aircraft.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
MerC From Sweden, joined Dec 2003, 590 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2158 times:
Instead of starting a new topic I will take it here.
I just had another photo rejected. That photo has been rejected about three times now, but with different reasons. I am puzzled. The two first rejections were badcameraangle, that I agree with. Had a hard time getting this one straight. But now, the last time, it got rejected for badexposure.
In the previous rejections there were no mentioning about badexposure. The photos are practically identical IMO.
I get pretty confused with different rejection reasons for practically the same photo. Now I have no clue what do to with it. Could it have been cause of different screeners, that would be pretty logic?
Here they are, take a look if you want and toss some advice my way.