Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Question  
User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 7 hours ago) and read 1674 times:

Today I had this photo rejected.


For two things.
badmotiv: I already was afraid for this kind of rejection, but I uploaded but you never know


badcentered: Maybe, If I had the full winglet I had more change? Or to much grass.

Just want to share it here with you, because I won't upload this anymore or it will rejected for the 2nd time for badmotiv.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

Great shot, looks like you solved your underexposure problem?

I think that if it were absolutely sharp and clear, it would be accepted. Although the winglet should be in completely.


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 hours ago) and read 1638 times:

If you had the gear more in the center of the picture and also maybe the winglet it might have had a higher chance. And it looks a bit soft too. As much as i like those shots i know very well from my own experience that they are hard to get into the database.

MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Peter Unmuth - VAP


User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 hours ago) and read 1627 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Karlok, it's well centered on the horizontal lines, you managed to capture a great smoker and cropped accordingly. However you chopped off too much of the fuselage. It would have looked better cropped like Peter's shot.

Also looks like the old heathaze played it's part here, the cheatline looks a bit wavy.

Anyway, I must say your work has been improving much lately, well done!


Alderman Exit
User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

Wietse, Yes underexposure problem is solved.
The solution was installing a New Custom Curve File to the camera.
And also increased the saturation settings on the camera from 0 to +6, it also helps.

Tim, Thanks.
I can't show you more fuselage because this is full frame shot. I was focusing on the wheels. Next time better.

[Edited 2004-04-18 21:35:45]

User currently offlineSfilipowicz From Netherlands, joined Jul 2002, 327 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

Hi Karlok,

Great shot, I love it!
I agree with Tim, a bit more fuselage would have been nice.

Keep up the good work!

User currently offlineA3204eva From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1060 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 hours ago) and read 1596 times:

Same with mine

MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Scott Keller

"They have lady pilots......... they're not that good, but they have 'em"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection Question posted Fri May 19 2006 06:28:21 by 777MechSys
Short Rejection Question posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:54:37 by Maartenw
Quick Rejection Question... posted Sat Jan 14 2006 04:39:27 by Mattbna
Rejection Question posted Fri Dec 9 2005 11:00:09 by Scbriml
A Rejection Question. posted Mon Nov 28 2005 14:57:45 by Chris78cpr
Rejection Question And Complaint posted Sun Jun 19 2005 20:29:26 by APFPilot1985
Another Rejection Question posted Fri May 13 2005 22:31:43 by BRAVO7E7
Rejection Question posted Mon Apr 11 2005 05:33:07 by APFPilot1985
Rejection Question posted Mon Mar 14 2005 20:11:55 by APFPilot1985
Badmotiv Rejection Question posted Wed Dec 8 2004 08:00:22 by QantasA332