Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Again, Rejections...  
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

But at least this time it wasn't from that shitty film camera. It's a good camera, just not for aviation photography. This one got BADSCAN and BADCOLOR.

Any way to fix or just bag it?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=APA1.jpg

I'm thinking if I play with the RGB values a little on this one, that might help, and/or Adobe USM.

Any thoughts?

(hey, you have to admit, this WAS better than the US 319  Smile/happy/getting dizzy )

DLKAPA







12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN737MC From Canada, joined Oct 2000, 678 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1446 times:

Well here are my findings.

Bad Color
Bad Dark
Blurry
Bad Motive!

Bag it!


Aaron Mandolesi
Denver, Colorado


User currently offlineConcord977 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1261 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1436 times:


Eric,

A.net is very tough on artistic or "mood" shots. They are in a mode of approving striking aircraft profiles with vibrant colors, and only those photos that have been post-processed to the max.

I thought your shot was interesting, and a nice change from one more obscure 737 on approach.

In any case, I took a few minutes to adjust your photo a bit. If nothing else, I removed the haze and eliminated the blue tint that was washing over the image. (note the difference in grass color).


Curt / concord977
Washington, DC



BEFORE


AFTER




No info
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

Aaron, what the kid needs is encouragement.

First off, what you need to do is get CLOSE, no use in getting something you DON'T need in the shot (that's why there's bad motive), the Colors are off because it looks like you pressed the White Balance mode option (just corrects the white during night time photography).

It's also looks like it was taken with the sun somewhat in front of you, I presume, and also the shutter speed was inappropriate or something was done to blur the pic.

Better try again.



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1430 times:

Still,
its not worth the time to mess with.

NEXT!

PS

It's a good camera, just not for aviation photography

I thought you were a 300D user?

Dont blame the camera. Its user error here, unless you got a bad specimen. Plenty of excellent photos taken with that camera in the DB.

[Edited 2004-04-19 05:37:00]

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1431 times:

Eric,
I know you only have a wide angle zoom at the moment, so do this...

GET CLOSER! Using the lens you have you should be damn near standing in the parking lot to get a decent picture of that tower. And....why did you decide to shoot into the sun? Take it to the other side and shoot, but not at mid-day, bad contrast. Read the book on color space, and white balance too while your reading. After that, read all you can about exposure modes and adjustments as well.

I know you don't have a lot of control over the exposure mode with the 300d, but what happened is the camera exposed for the bright sky making everthing else way too dark.

Jeff


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1421 times:

It's a good camera, just not for aviation photography

I thought you were a 300D user?


This pic was taken with the 300D. The camera that I was referring to that wasn't good for aviation photography was my film camera that took that pic of the USAir 319.

I am truly amazed at what the 300D has provided me. On wensday I will probably start looking for longer lenses.

GET CLOSER! Using the lens you have you should be damn near standing in the parking lot to get a decent picture of that tower. And....why did you decide to shoot into the sun? Take it to the other side and shoot, but not at mid-day, bad contrast. Read the book on color space, and white balance too while your reading. After that, read all you can about exposure modes and adjustments as well.

I was driving around Inverness for the better part of an hour looking for a place to shoot with the sun at my back. As it seems the airport is on a hill, I had no luck finding a good spot to take a photo.

Concord, what did you do to edit the shot?

Thanks for your help

DLKAPA


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

As it seems the airport is on a hill, I had no luck finding a good spot to take a photo.

Eric,
I know that area like the back of my hand, don't tell me you could not find a decent place. All you have to do is look at a shadow.... That lens is an 18-50? or something like that? Using that lens and standing across the road you could have got the whole tower in the frame.

Jeff


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1409 times:

Sorry,
I misunderstood you. Keep shooting, try to get closer.


User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 41
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1409 times:

OK here are my ideas-

First of all, it appears that this image is straight out of the camera. You MUST do some post-processing before you upload. In this case (sigh) there is quite a bit of work to be done to salvage a marginal image at best.

First of all, you say the tower is the subject of the photo, yet it's the size of a dime in the middle of this huge panoramic shot that shows us a bunch of trees, buildings, cars and trucks blocking the view.

IF you really wanted to upload this photo, the very first thing you should do is crop ALL of that stuff out of the picture. Show us the tower. Only. If the view is a panoramic view, it must be at least mildly interesting.

Ironically, I have a tower shot that I uploaded recently. Take a look at it.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg


You can see this is really not the greatest photo in the database, but it's got good color, the focus is good, and there's even an aircraft on final behind it. All of these elements got this photo accepted, despite the fact that it is a bit on the grainy side (the weather sucked that day).

Shoot your photos in Large JPG mode, and that gives you the capability to crop extremely small, and not lose quality. If you want help on selecting settings and post-processing for the 300D, look at this post:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/aviation_photography/read.main/124182/

Then there's post-processing. My God, your photo's got a buttload of blue in it. Were you using any filters? I use UV ONLY on my 300D. You really need to install that PhotoShop Elements CD that came with your camera - it really will help you improve your acceptance stats.

Eric, don't think that I'm bashing you here - I'm not. If you could see the rubbish I uploaded after I bough MY 300D - you'd laugh your a$$ off. Looking back, I have no clue what I was thinking. My first batch of 10 uploads got rejected - every single one of them. I got irritated, but kept trying. When I look at those images, I can CLEARLY see why they were rejected.

Lastly, regarding your comment that "It's a good camera, just not for aviation photography" - take a look on this site, and see how many thousands of photos come from that camera. The 300D, if used correctly, can yield AMAZING results. I now have 144 photos on this site, and had 15 uploaded just today. I'm averaging around 90% acceptance, and it's because I learned how to use my 300D and how to post-process effectively.

This shot came out of my Digital Rebel (same as 300D), and was cropped, and resized. That's it. This image is pure, un-retouched data, straight out of the camera:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg



If you have any questions, or ever need any help, drop me an e-mail, I'd be glad to help you out. Good folks like Tim Samples, Chad Thomas, and a few others helped ME out, and that's how I know my camera so well. I have them to thank for it!

DREW



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1405 times:

My goal was really more to get as much of the airport as I could into the frame, that's why I found myself driving around inverness so much, but in light of recent suggestions, I'll head closer for a shot of the tower.

Thanks guys.

DLKAPA


User currently offlineConcord977 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1261 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1394 times:

Eric,

I used Neat Image, followed by Photoshop 8.01.

Curt / concord977



No info
User currently offlineRsmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1359 times:



For some reason that image could be a dead ringer for the David Koresh Branch Davidian compound in Waco that burnned a few years ago....

Just a observation Smile



Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Again The Rejections Rise posted Mon Jan 10 2005 02:19:48 by CYEGsTankers
Need Help With Rejections.. Again. *rolls Eyes* posted Sun Aug 3 2003 08:01:08 by Delta777-XXX
Centered Rejections posted Tue Dec 12 2006 19:44:30 by Paulinbna
A Little Tired Of Those Rejections. posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:38:14 by B076
Need Help With Two Rejections posted Fri Nov 24 2006 19:14:35 by B076
Blemishes, Blemishes And Again Blemishes posted Wed Nov 22 2006 19:20:45 by Aero145
Spotting At YSSY....again posted Fri Nov 17 2006 23:25:58 by Brett
Help With These Two Rejections posted Thu Nov 16 2006 21:11:41 by JoeIro
4 (harsh?) Rejections - Screener Comment Please posted Sun Nov 12 2006 08:23:56 by D L X
Rejected... Again... posted Thu Nov 9 2006 00:29:29 by D L X