Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Opinions On Canon Is Lenses  
User currently offlineSouthpaw8669 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 141 posts, RR: 7
Posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3551 times:

Is it worth it to spend the money on IS 75-300 or spend half that and by a typical 75-300.


Thanks for your opinions


Eric


@southpawcapture
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3474 times:

Remember, the IS will only work for non-panning shots. It really depends on what exactly you plan on shooting...


MIA777
User currently offlineEmmett99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days ago) and read 3442 times:

Ryan,

I don't want to argue but I have my IS on all the time when I shoot at SEA with my 28-135. What's up with that?

Bill


User currently offlineAndrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 41
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3437 times:

Mia777-

I use the 75/300 IS USM, and I used Image Stabilization for the following shots:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg


YES You CAN use IS for panning shots! In fact, I think the results are pretty darned good. It does take a bit of practice, but it can definately be done.

I'm in the market for a new L lens, and I will NOT buy one without IS! It's amazing - especially in low light conditions. Absolutely the best lens in my bag.

DREW



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3431 times:

Eric,
Why not the 100-400 L IS? Then you will have the option...

Jeff


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3424 times:

Wow, dude with the same name as I. Go fig  Insane

I was looking at a nice Canon 300 IS lens the other day. Test shot it inside the store, and from what I have seen, I am impressed.

Btw anybody wanna contribute to the "Eric Smith Lens Fund?" This thing is gonna run me in the hole 1300 bucks and I'm going to college this fall.

hmmm

DLKAPA


User currently offlineFLYBHX From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3407 times:

The 100-400L IS needs a large mortgage. In the UK I think it works out at about £1300 or a little over $2000.

User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 64
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3398 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

Agree with some of you, I have the IS on quite a few of my departure/arrival shots and no problems for me.

Cheers

Gary Watt


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 3342 times:

HEHEHE.

IS doesnt work when panning? Peeshaw.

It works fine.

[Edited 2004-04-25 10:33:29]

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 3335 times:

Chad,

He meant the single IS version that is found on the 75-300 IS. The IS on your 100-400 is dual mode and it is great for both panning and/or static objects.

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 3328 times:

Canon says IS single mode does not work for panning. People above say it does, and have results to prove it. What's going on?

There are a few possibilities:

1 - IS doesn't work with panning, and the fact that panned shots with IS turned on exist is simply a credit to the photographer's skills - ie. the same results would have been achieved without IS turned on.

2 - Canon don't know what they're talking about

3 - A misunderstanding or misrepresentation of how IS works. I believe IS is achieved through the use of accelerometers - ie, the system detects changes in motion, not motion itself. If this is true, then the moment you begin to pan, the acceleration will be such that it causes the IS to stop working. However, once up to "panning speed", the motion becomes constant and any variations (shake) will fall back into the IS parameters, and hence a constant motion can indeed be stabilized. In short, provided you don't try and shoot at the start of your panning swing, you may be OK.

The difference between this and a mode 2 lens, is that in the later case either horizontal or vertical accelerations can be ignored altogether making the lens tolerant of variations in the panning speed - and avoiding a "danger zone" at the start of a pan.

I don't have a single mode lens to test this with, but perhaps someone else would like to experiment. I think it is highly unlikely that Canon are incorrect in their description of IS, but I do think it is possible for photographers to intentionally or accidentally develop techniques which allow equipment to be used outside the design parameters.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 14 hours ago) and read 3299 times:

IS is achieved by using rate gyros, not accelerometers. Different beasts all together.

Jeff


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 14 hours ago) and read 3288 times:

Thanks Jeff - but is it not the case that rate gyros also respond to changes in motion?

Cheers,

Colin




Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

I think Colin is more or less right with option 3. I don't however think that IS turns off when you start panning, but instead it tries to compensate for the acceleration in the horizontal plane at the beginning of the pan, which can foul up things for the photographer. Then, once you are panning with constant speed it should work fine and any variations in panning speed will be counteracted by the IS as long as they are small enough.

Staffan


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

All gyros respond to changes in motion. It is what and how they handle that change that makes them useful. An accelerometer is more or less a neutrally balanced mass that only measures a change in velocity. A gyro on the other hand, does not react to changes in velocity, but rather movement about it's sensitive axis.

Jeff


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 12 hours ago) and read 3268 times:

Hmm, got me thinking.. if it indeed is a gyro, it will most likely "max out" at one end of its moving range if you start panning with it activated. If that doesn't cause it to switch off it will probably give the same effect as having it switched off (since it can't move any further) with the only difference that it will still work in the vertical plane.

Staffan


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 12 hours ago) and read 3264 times:

Staffan,
A gyro can sense movement 360 degrees about it's axis. I have never heard of a gyro being "maxed" out. What good would that be? Don't forget there is probably mechanical and software limits imposed on the range of movement on the movable glass elements.


User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 12 hours ago) and read 3262 times:

Many gyros in Artificial Horizons can indeed "max out".
Limits has to be considered.
/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 12 hours ago) and read 3260 times:

I decided to play with the 70-200mm 2.8L IS + 2x yesterday.

I wanted to see how slow a shutterspeed I could go with this combo and still get consistent results.

These three were shot at 1/60th.







That was about as slow as I would want to go handheld. With a monopod or tripod I am sure I could go down to 1/45th.

The effects of IS in panning are still undecided to me. The lens I was using had the Dual Mode IS. I was in Mode 2 for all these shots. I also own the 28-135mm USM IS and I have learned to turn the IS off for panning. I can actually feel the gyros pegging when I pan. Results are relatively inconsistent. I still usually only get one or two usable frames out of a burst of 8. I think the Dual Mode IS in the L lenses is far better calibrated than the 28-135 though. The former lens, I believe, is designed for zoomed out camera shake only.

I think the best way to achieve good results is indeed all in your hands. Literally. I think IS helps, but having a steady hand and a smooth pan is the best "trick."

william


User currently offlineExitRow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 months 11 hours ago) and read 3250 times:

Oh and to answer the thread starter question:

Is it worth it to spend the money on IS 75-300 or spend half that and by a typical 75-300.

Buy the best lens you can afford. IS is always a plus in my book, especially at the farther end of the zoom. Though, I think IS is best suited to low-light, F2.8 work. That's why I am thinking of buying this lens. I do a lot of low-light photography in my commercial work and this lens is a MUST. Twice now I have wanted to rent it for jobs and it's been reserved already. I need it in my bag. Shots like this would be impossible without IS.



This lens will pay for itself in no more than two jobs.

As for aviation photography, well... again, if it's hi-key conditions, the advantages of IS are negligable. If you're shooting in darker conditions and want to maintain a high ISO, it's a must.

william


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 months 11 hours ago) and read 3245 times:

Jeff, since there is no use in having a group of lens elements rotating 360 degrees, I don't see why the gyro should either.
I would imagine, that when IS is activated the gyros will be centered in planes parallell to the direction the lens is pointing, with the moving lenses also centered. When the lens is moved in another direction (ie shake), the gyros will move the IS lens group to counteract it. Since there is a limit to how much that lensgroup can move before you'll get a distorted image and I'd assume the lenses are mechanichally blocked from moving beyond that limit.
So, when they hit that position what happens? Do the gyros disconnect from the lens group or does the blocked lens group prevent the gyro from moving any further? My guess is the latter. All speculations, but it would make sense.

Staffan


User currently offlineEmmett99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 months 9 hours ago) and read 3227 times:

Since I am one who said panning with IS does work, I would definately have to go with Ckw's post number 10, #1 as the reason.  Big thumbs up

"...is simply a credit to the photographer's skills....."

Bill


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 22, posted (10 years 3 months 7 hours ago) and read 3215 times:

I have heard a rumor, when using the 100-400mm L IS on a tripod, the IS 'gets squirrely'. Anyone have any experience using this lens on a tripod?

[Edited 2004-04-25 23:34:10]

User currently offlinePaulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (10 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 3199 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

In the Manuel that comes with all IS lenses it says to turn off the IS when on a Tripod. I forgot to this one time and my shots of the Atlanta skyline all came out looking like I had moved the camera.

Oh and I don't usually plug my pictures but this is subject driven.

I have shot down to 1/25 th with the IS on my 100-400 L IS.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Robbins
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Robbins



and this one is 1/20 th


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Robbins




Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 24, posted (10 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 3189 times:

Just because it is IS doesnt mean you can totally rely on the IS feature to bail you out so to speak, in certain situations. As Colin stated, you have to develop your skills. We all probably have minor differences in our technique using the IS feature. Image Stabilization is an excellent technology and when used correctly, will allow you to push the limits of the aviation photography envelope.

After shooting fast movers for a day, I am drained from concetrating so much on my panning speed etc. Sounds easy, it is not. Panning to slowly or to quickly will effect the photo. A perfect pan will most often yield a perfect result. This lens sucks as much as any long focal length lens when it is windy, although, you have a bit of a chance with the IS feature, it will not completely save you.



User currently offlineSouthpaw8669 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 141 posts, RR: 7
Reply 25, posted (10 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

thanks guys for all your help, I have purchased the Canon IS 75 300.

Eric



@southpawcapture
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Opinions On Canon 75-300 Is USM posted Tue May 11 2004 15:23:18 by Danny
Autofocus On Canon EOS Lenses... posted Sun Sep 22 2002 01:45:31 by EGGD
Canon Is Lenses posted Thu Nov 29 2001 10:37:32 by Mikey
Opinions On The Canon 28-300 L Is Lens posted Fri Jun 25 2004 11:46:36 by Paulianer
Some Comments On Canon 24-105L Is F/4 posted Wed Jun 21 2006 16:48:12 by LHRman
Opinions Wanted On Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III posted Tue Mar 8 2005 13:57:46 by PhotoLPPT
Advice Needed On Wide Angle Lenses For Canon Dslr posted Mon Sep 29 2003 18:21:17 by FL350
Info On Image Stabilizer On Canon Lenses posted Sun Aug 10 2003 23:44:39 by Paulinbna
Canon EOD D60 Image Quality W/ Canon USM Is Lenses posted Tue Sep 10 2002 19:10:54 by Marco_Polo
Opinions On These Photos posted Sun Nov 26 2006 07:31:45 by Longhornmaniac