Confused With Rejections — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Confused With Rejections

Mikedlayer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1037 times:

Hi all,

Bit confused with some of the rejections on the site I've had lately with some of my photos from LHR. Firstly when I look at the photos that I've had rejected, sometimes it's my photo with someone elses comments/details and vice versa so what's going on there I have no idea!

Firstly: BA Airbus A319:

MyAviation.net photo:

Photo © Mike Layer

Reason: "badscan", email said it was low quality, just can't see what part of the quality is low in this one. And plus it isn't a scan, it's a photo taken with a digital camera Smile

.

Secondly: Lufthansa Regional Jet 100LR:

MyAviation.net photo:

Photo © Mike Layer

Reason: "badscan", email also said it was low quality. Once again it isn't a scan...

Thirdly:
MyAviation.net photo:

Photo © Mike Layer

Reason: "badscan", email also said it was low quality. Lol once again, it isn't a scan!!!

Sorry I am pretty new at uploading photos to Airliners.net so I'm still trying to find my way around things. I can take rejection, just I can't see how these are low quality?

Bit confused with the rejection reasons too!!

5 replies: All unread, jump to last

A3204eva From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1060 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1011 times:

Happens to me too.

1st photo - Nice shot, can't really see anything wrong with it

2nd - Grainy and a bit blurred

3rd - Grainy and a bit blurred again

A320

"They have lady pilots......... they're not that good, but they have 'em"

Vir380 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2002, 616 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1004 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Mike this topic has been covered over and over , 1st of all how new are you to Airliners.net

"Badscan" as a rejection reason has been around for a while now and as a reason covered any image that was low quality , did you read the text that was with the reject reason , that does tell you where generally the image is flawed .

Having a look at the images you posted i agree with the "badscan" or as they now have been renamed "badquality" the images are ok but not AN standard just yet , they are soft with a bit more practice and perhaps some more work they will make it so dont loose faith youll get there.

regards Tony

[Edited 2004-05-03 17:14:40]

Portcolumbus From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1612 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 987 times:

The thumbnails look good, but when I go to the full-size picture, they're all pretty fuzzy.

Mhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 979 times:

Mike, nice pics.

the other problem is to get LHR shots accepted you do need to be totally assured of the quality - so many LHR shots are uploaded that screeners have to be very harsh, after all there are already plents of BA A319s at LHR in the db!

No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced

Mikedlayer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 972 times:

Thanks for the tips guys. Will try to make them a little better using the tips in the email and will reupload possibly. Thinking of buying a Canon 300D sometime soon so hopefully I won't be getting too many rejections because they're too grainy! Big grin

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: