Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
300D, Best Lens For Distance  
User currently offlineUnited4everDEN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4761 times:

Hello,

A great thing happened today, and I have been offered a lens for my 300D, but I have to ask, which is best? I am looking for one that has good zoom, but nothing like a 400mm fixed, infact, no fixed lenses at all. So what should it be? I want nothing either, that will "just work in most places", I want all places.

Thanks

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4747 times:

How much do you plan on spending? If cost isnt an issue go with the 100-400mm L IS.

User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4741 times:

Ryan, since cost is an issue, do what I did.

Go with the Canon 75-300mm USM. Cost me about $220 over at Mike's, and it works fine for me. The only thing is that between 200-300mm, I keep the aperture at no wider than 11, otherwise it gets soft.

But with that in mind, it's a good lens to go with IMO

Eric


User currently offlineUnited4everDEN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4732 times:

Nope, cost is not an issue

Is 100-400 the equivilent of a 4x zoom? I want better than that


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4725 times:

Here in Denver, the 100-400 will be all you will ever need. Remember the 300D has a crop ratio of 1.6, so do this: Multiply 400 by 1.6. That will be how much you get when in full zoom, for example: When I zoom to 300mm, It is actually 300x1.6, which equals something in the neighborhood of 485mm.

That is one of the many reasons why I like the 300D.

DLKAPA


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4727 times:

The 100-400 is Canon's longest zoom...so if you won't go for primes, forget it (at least from Canon). How about a 28-300 and a 400 DO?


MIA777
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 739 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

OK, I suspect you're still thinking in digicam terms. If you really mean the best, you need to think in SLR terms.

All zooms are a compromise on optical quality, the greater the zoom range, the more you sacridice in quality. So what do you want? If zoom range is a big issue for you get the Sigma 50-500.

If image quality is the important, the Canon 100-400 is probably the best long zoom you can buy.

If the ultimate in image quality is what you want, then forget zooms altogether and look at the Canon 500mm or 600mm f4LIS - if price really isn't the issue that is, as either of these lenses is the price of a car  Smile

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineMikec From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 247 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4722 times:

"Is 100-400 the equivilent of a 4x zoom? I want better than that"

No it isn't! To get an equivalent x zoom number you are looking at, you divide the total focal length (including crop factor) by 35 to get a conventional x times zoom number. In the case of the 100-400L it would be 400 x 1.6 = 640mm. Divide by 35, gives you 18.3x zoom - that's what it would be if it was on a normal digicam. Definitely not 4x!!!

I'm sure someone will correct me if that isn't right!

[Edited 2004-05-22 01:27:46]

User currently offlineRotor1 From Tajikistan, joined Mar 2003, 230 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4718 times:

I believe zoom refers to the amount of difference between wide angle and maximum telephoto. It's a deceptive word -- if you had a lens that had 20x zoom but its wide angle was 12mm, you'd only be looking at a 240mm lens on the long end. On the other hand, a 100-400L has a 4x zoom, but is 400mm at the long end.

Zoom is versatility, but focal length (mm) is magnification. The more zoom, USUALLY the more tradeoffs (IE maximum aperature, image quality, distortion, abberation, WEIGHT, etc).

Money not an option? Get a 400 F2.8 and go from there. Sharp and fast, but expencive... or you could get a 500 F4. E-mail me your address and the hours you're at work, as well.

-Mike



The best aviation photo I've ever taken was rejected by Airliners.net
User currently offlineMikec From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 247 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4712 times:

Thanks for the explanation Mike. I assumed United4everDEN was referring to digicam terminology when he said 4x zoom and "I want better than that", so my explanation was to give an equivalent digicam optical zoom figure based on the full focal length of the 100-400 for comparison.

User currently offlineUnited4everDEN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4712 times:

How good is the 35-350?
filler


User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4692 times:

It's known to be one of Canon's "weaker" (in terms of image quality) L lenses (still great though). It also lacks IS which is rough if you've become really used to it, but they new 28-300 does have IS but costs quite a bit.


MIA777
User currently offlineFightingdingo From United States of America, joined May 2004, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4672 times:

Does the amount of zoom you use effect the image quality?

User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4662 times:

Does the amount of zoom you use effect the image quality?

Depends. If you are using an Optical zoom lens, then it depends on the lens. If you are using Digital zoom, well, lets just say I feel sorry for you.



User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4657 times:

Well, the Sigma lenses are known to be good all around in the high mm ranges. I might suggest a 50-500 or a 170-500 depending on what gap you need to fill...

I believe the 170-500 is somewhere in the 500$ range and the 50-500 is in the 900$+ range.



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineJeffm From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4649 times:

You can pick up a 100-400 L IS locally for $1600 bucks. You can save about $200 bucks if you buy online.

and yes, a 100-400 is a 4X zoom.


User currently offlineFightingdingo From United States of America, joined May 2004, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4580 times:

Is the Canon 75-300mm a good zoom?

User currently offlineUnited4everDEN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4496 times:

How many times zoom is the 28-90? What about the 28-135 and 35-350?

Would it be 3.2 and 4.8 and 10 respectively?

Thanks


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Lens For This Kind Of Photography. posted Wed Jan 26 2005 06:49:06 by Daren3006
Best Spotting Lens For Maxxum 5 posted Fri Apr 22 2005 23:13:10 by Zone1
Best Accessory For 300D/rebel posted Sun Jul 18 2004 20:30:50 by JAT74L
Please Help: Under $600 Lens For The 300D posted Sun May 23 2004 17:19:39 by MNeo
Need Advice On WA Lens For 300D posted Tue Mar 9 2004 01:24:24 by 707CMF
Opinions Of This Lens For The 300D posted Sun Feb 15 2004 03:26:58 by Daren3006
Camera And Lens For A Novice Photographer... posted Sun Sep 17 2006 22:11:06 by Longhornmaniac
Good Lens For Nikon posted Tue Apr 18 2006 14:26:47 by LukasMako
Best Zoom For A Nikon D70s? posted Wed Mar 8 2006 11:00:57 by DFW13L
Quantaray 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Lens For Canon AF posted Tue Jan 10 2006 04:26:41 by Sokol