Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Help, Original Available For Playing  
User currently offlineTxiki1uk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2815 times:

I need help, and lots of it. I am new to DSLRs and photographing aircraft. I recently purchased a 300D and started to take pictures at LHR. I have been inspired by the work I have seen on A.net, and I getting to grips with the camera and post processing. I have had a couple of photos accepted and about 10 rejects. The latest one is from yesterday of the latest BMI A319 which I took yesterday morning at LHR. Problem is I am spalshing around in the pool without making much progress. So, I'd appreciate some help sorting out a photo I spent a couple of hours on last night that was rejected this morning. The aim of this post is to improve my photos and processing.

Now, I have put the original RAW file and a TIFF version on a FTP site that I have so you guys can have a look at the source files and perhaps point me in the right direction.

It has been rejected for badquality and badsoft. OK, the bad soft is due to me not using the USM enough - still learning this one, however, it is a 7 megapix image taken in bright sunlight, although the original is a little underexposed. However, by using my PS book and a bit of adjusting of levels, burning etc, I thought I had turned out a pretty good image!?!?!?. Obviously not.

The photo as submitted

Here is the original

The original source file is at the link below and is 6.26MB

I would appreciate any help as to where I am going wrong. As I am a beginner in the world of DSLRs and I know I am having problems with the 300D as there is no spot metering on it that I can get to work, I'd appreciate advice on this as well. Kick me while I'm down, I can take it.  Crying



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2756 times:

I played around with your .RAW file and got this:

Using PS CS RAW editor, I changed your white balance to "daylight" and that made a nice improvment, nevertheless I use mine always on "auto". You must be more gentle with levels and a good application of "shadow/highlight" tool also benefits this image. Other that this I used also "Color Washer" and "Focal Blade" for color and sharpening adjustment.

But there is an initial "problem", this photo seems to be made in mid day with strong light from above, almost backlit, almost, these are not good light conditions to make photos.


User currently offlineTxiki1uk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2671 times:

Now I have a copy of PS CS, and I am wondering where I can find the "color wash" and "focal blade" filters are?

User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2666 times:

Badsoft and badscan can be tough. I don't think it's helped by the fact that it's a relatively common aircraft. I think the screeners are particularly stringent in cases like this. I caught the same aircraft from the other side and got badscan, so my advice would be to just keep working at it.

With most of these shots, I found that I had to be very careful to not be too trick with the levels on the underside of the aircraft. The temptation is to bring all that detail out, but it can look plain odd, and introduce alot of noise in the brightened areas.

Still, learning's the fun part, and I anticipate you'll have plenty of stuff in soon!

It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 813 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2649 times:

"Colorwash" and ""Focal Blade" are 3rd party plugins for Photoshop and must be purchased separately

Another thing to keep in mind is that you can give yourself a LOT more latitude for image adjustment if you work in 16bit mode instead of 8bit mode (ie. convert RAW to a 16bit tif, and only reduce to 8bit mode prior to saving)

In my opinion it is unfortunate that "colorwash" can only work on 8 bit images which greatly reduces its potential (FocalBalde works fine on 16 bit)



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Request For Rejection Help... posted Tue Mar 29 2005 02:57:04 by AirbusfanYYZ
Rejection Help For Bad Info posted Tue Oct 14 2003 05:43:09 by Paulinbna
Rejection Help posted Thu Nov 2 2006 21:19:55 by Nbseer
Rejection Help - Info And Category posted Thu Nov 2 2006 11:16:26 by UA935
Quality Rejection Help Requested posted Mon Oct 30 2006 00:52:36 by Ptrjong
Soft Rejection Help posted Fri Oct 27 2006 22:54:51 by D L X
Rejection Help: Colour & Dark posted Fri Oct 27 2006 03:35:17 by TransIsland
Motion Blur Rejection - Help Please! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 00:44:13 by QantasA332
Rejection Help posted Sun Oct 8 2006 15:23:26 by TransIsland
Motiv Rejection Help posted Wed Sep 27 2006 12:00:48 by Raptors