Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon RAW Question  
User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2928 times:

Will changing the exposure compensation in the RAW software have the same effect as changing it in camera at the time of the photograph? Of course, this assumes there are no blown highlights.

For example, you take a photo and the exposure compensation is set to -1. If you took the same photo at EV 0, and changed it afterwards with the RAW software to -1, would it be the exact same as if you took it originally with the exposure compensation set to -1?

Am I making sense?  Smile

Does this also apply to WB as well?


Jet City Aviation Photography
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2791 times:

You can adjust the WB afterwards without any loss of quality, but not the exposure. It works up to a certain degree, but there are limits. One half up or down shouldn't be a problem though.

Thomas


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 769 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2788 times:

No its not exactly the same - there will be a small loss of quality if you try and increase the exposure (ie fix an underexposed photo). This is because the more light hitting the sensor, the better the signal to noise ratio.

For instance, a patch of neutral grey underexposed by one stop and corrected in conversion will show slightly more noise than the same grey patch correctly exposed. By the same logic, the extra noise will be most noticeable in the shadow areas.

In practice, working with a full size image, I would say up to one stop compensation is probably unnoticeable in a final print - beyond that, the noise will become evident in the shadows.

Conversly reducing exposure should show no loss in quality (though, as you correctly state, youcan't recover detail that was never recorded).

White balance can be adjusted with absolutely no loss of quality as the RAW image is actually B&W - colour is only applied when the image is processed - either in camera for .jpg or in software for RAW.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2707 times:

Thank you both for the replies, very much appreciated!


Jet City Aviation Photography
User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2695 times:

Colin, as always a very informative answer to a specific technical question.

APPLAUSE!!!!

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon RAW In Photoshop CS2 posted Tue Jan 17 2006 20:05:54 by Nirmalmakadia
Canon 10D Question posted Sun Sep 11 2005 10:03:11 by PipoA380
Canon Lenses Question posted Sun Feb 27 2005 09:53:51 by Bruce
Editing Canon RAW (CR2) Format posted Thu Feb 3 2005 20:57:09 by Janne
Canon L Lens Question posted Sun Jun 13 2004 14:58:50 by BA777
Canon RAW (.crw) posted Sun Mar 14 2004 04:45:40 by United4everDEN
Canon Warranty Question posted Thu Feb 5 2004 08:30:46 by UTA_FLYingHIGH
Canon D... Battery Question posted Sun Nov 2 2003 08:57:05 by Bruce
Canon Camera Question posted Mon Apr 29 2002 23:45:37 by Jer32382
Canon 30D - Early Problems Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 16:53:40 by Sabena 690